Home
October 12, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Life without God

Nietzsche may have declared God dead in the 19th century, but He refused to go quietly. Today, fundamentalist religion is on the rise and God is staging a comeback: in the media and the classroom, as well as in church. But now, sceptical philosophers have regrouped and are fighting the faithful under the banner of The New Atheists

ELIGION HAS coursed through this young century like a rip-tidethroughanotherwisecalmwaterway.Adecadeor two ago, when atheism was the popular default setting, it would have seemed unbelievable that thestrongestculturalcurrentofthethirdmillenniumwouldbemonotheism.Yet everywhere we look today, in almost every aspect of publiclife,religionisstagingacomeback.

In Turkey, the defiantly secular state established by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk in 1920 is facing pressure from Islamist parties. In America, Creationists want their theory of how life developed to feature alongside Darwinism in science class. In France, there is anongoingrowoverthe wearing of the veil. In the UK, there are worries about the roleofevangelicalreligionincity academies and anawarenessthatreligiousinterestgroupsfeelemboldenedandempowered.Andsowehavehad Christians trying to force an opera off the schedulesofournationalbroadcaster, Sikhs storming a Birmingham theatreand,justthismonth,aturbulentScottish cardinal proposing a ban on communion for Catholic politicians who back abortion.

Whyallthisnow?TheeventsofSeptember11,2001,theriseoftheneoconsinAmericaandthe so-called war on terror are the short-term reasons. But there are many who look further back and see the seeds of this religious renewal in thevictoryofthemujahidinin Afghanistan, in the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, in the fall of the USSR.

As religion rises to its feet, however, so too does its shadow - atheism. From across Europe and America has come a slew of humanists and philosophers eager to reassert their position and argue against a faith-based system of ethics. In place of pulpits and soap-boxes they have publishers and chat shows and they have been dubbed The New Atheists.

TheNewAtheistsareledinthiscountrybythe philosopher Anthony Grayling, author of Against All Gods (published in March), and the scientist and arch-Darwinist Richard Dawkins, who last year published The God Delusion, a New York Times bestseller and his most controversial book to date.

In America there is Daniel C Dennett, who wrote BreakingTheSpell:ReligionAsANatural Phenomenon, and Sam Harris, whohaswrittennotonebuttwobestsellersonthesubject, The End Of Faith and Letter To A Christian Nation. Both Harris and Dennett are American and, unsurprisingly, it's in the Land Of The Freethatdebatehasragedmostfiercely.Dennett,oddly,referstoatheistsas "brights".

Thenthereisthearchpolemicist Christopher Hitchens. His tome God Is Not Great: The Case Against Religion hits the bookshops here next week.

Finally,inFrance,thehomeofsecular republicanism, the philosopher Michel Onfray has joined the battle.

Onfray's In Defence Of Atheism: The Case Against Christianity,JudaismAndIslam has already sold more than 300,000 copies in Franceandhasjustbeenpublishedin English.

ItisAnthonyGrayling,Christopher Hitchens and Michel Onfray I have setouttotalkto,inaseriesof encounters aimed at teasing out what they believe - and perhaps resolving a few questions of my own.

WhatIhearmostclearlyisthis:thebattlelineshavebeendrawn.

So which side are you on?

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: SPorter, Spain on 12:53am Sun 10 Jun 07
When is the SH ever going to get round to fixing the settings or whatever which make its online articles virtually unreadable? Thought this article could beinterestingbutface
dwith words with about 50 letters I couldn't be bothered reading it.
Posted by: Joe, Glasgow on 2:27am Sun 10 Jun 07
Totally agree. Couldn't be bothered after the 1st paragraph.
Posted by: Doug on 9:30am Sun 10 Jun 07
Agreed, this is almost unreadble, what does "rip-tidethroughanot
herwisecalmwaterway" or
"anawarenessthatreli
giousinterestgroupsf
eelemboldenedandempo
wered" mean ?
Posted by: redleb on 10:04am Sun 10 Jun 07
In our new post-theist world, simple articles of Faith, likespacesbetwwenwor
ds will have to be discarded.
Posted by: S.Beaton, St Cyrus on 11:08am Sun 10 Jun 07
Read Richard Dawkins "The God Delusion" for enlightenment.
Posted by: Alexander MacAllister, Oslo on 12:05pm Sun 10 Jun 07
Maybe it's time to establish a clear agenda for a society based Spiritual Secularism, where there is room for people to practise their religions in peace and freedom, and the religious can otherwise leave the rest of us in peace?
Posted by: MInted Stereo, GLasgow on 1:03pm Sun 10 Jun 07
So what happened to the christian/islamic/re
ligious point of view in this article? Why are only the representatives of 'aithiesm' afforded pages on my SH?
Posted by: Famouslastwords on 7:32pm Sun 10 Jun 07
William Hychyns AKA William TYNDALE: 'Oh Lord, open the King of England's eyes'. Strangled, but regained cnsciousness, then burned alive in Vilvoorde, Belgium (15 mins from Brussels by train)
Degree: Master of Arts .
Translated the scripturen into English. Let there be light and Scapegoat are his translated words among others. Studied under Dutch humanist and theologian ERASMUS. Famous last words: 'Dear God'
Posted by: Hugh Hill, Ayr on 7:35pm Sun 10 Jun 07
God is just another superstitious belief. A belief in a god, any kind of god, is no more harmful than a belief in fairies at the bottom of the garden, it is what such an infantile belief spawns - religion.
Religion is a bad thing as most people will readily agree. Religions are quite simply power systems as Roman catholicism and Islam clearly show. If we can rid our world of the curse of religion then we can get on with creating a sensible society based on reality and common sense. While we still put up with these power systems we will never be able to make the kind of social and scientific progress mankind is capable of.
Religion is a curse and we should tackle it with the same vigour and endeavour as we are tackling that other current curse, climate change.
Posted by: Martin, Glasgow on 2:53pm Mon 11 Jun 07
Hugh, you are obviously from the fundamentalist wing of the atheist party and will not tolerate anyone who disagress with you. Personally, I don't want to live in your glorious religion-free world - it sounds a bit fascist.

I suspect you're forgetting (and you're not alone in this) that many of the human rights we now hold to be universal are derived from Christ's teachings.

Christians were at the forefront in the abolision of salvery, votes for women, the formation of the trade union, Labour movement, CND ... I could go on.

Posted by: Mary Treherne, London, England on 7:56pm Mon 11 Jun 07
If religious faith as we know it from history and tradition is inconsistent with reason than it must simple mean that religion is false and faith misguided. No problem. Religion is a fraud.

But why not ask or imagine what a 'faith' would look like that IS consistent with reason as we have come to understand it in the modern world?

How about this: 'It is the first ever viable religious conception leading faith to observable consequences which can be tested and judged; a teaching able to demonstrate its own efficacy; the first ever religious claim of knowledge that meets the criteria of verifiable, evidence based truth embodied in action. As such this teaching enters the public domain as a 'religious' reality entirely new to human history.'

That was taken from a review of the first new interpretation of the teachings of Christ for 2000 years that is spreading on the web. And expect it to cause real big difficulties for religious, secular and athiest alike.

Check these links for further information and commentary:
http://www.dunwander
inpress.org
http://www.ovimagazi
ne.com/art/1676
http://www.ovimagazi
ne.com/art/1726
Posted by: Rob, Glasgow on 2:32am Tue 12 Jun 07
As an Atheist i find the views of these people completely stupid. I've stopped describing myself as an Atheist due to the stigma these people are spreading.
Alot of them seem to hold to the belief that Religion will eventually fade away. This is such total stupidity that it actually makes my head hurt. I'd honestly more likely believe in faries or santa claus than the idea that humanity will ever adopt reason and common sense. That's like asking fish to fly or birds to swim. It's sadly not in our nature.
People are consumed by the needs of the moment and are averse to talk of reason and logic as much as children are.
Posted by: ardaga, bahia, brazil on 7:50pm Tue 12 Jun 07
Imagine us (in Brazil, Russia, Senegal, Vietnam..) if even native English speakers run into trouble trying to read this...
Posted by: Veritas on 11:37am Wed 13 Jun 07
Hey Martin,

Just maybe the MAJORITY in this country who aren't religious are sick to the back teeth of MINORITY zealots like you DICTATING to us about what is right and what is wrong.


Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login