Gaels force the issue Scotland’s first Gaelic movie may still be up for a top award … despite a Bafta snub CHRIS YOUNG, producer of Scotland's first everGaelicfeaturefilm,isdriving through anonymous suburbia just north of where the London tube lines run out. We are on the way to the set of Baggy Trousers, a new project for E4 that promises to be to sitcoms what Skins was to teenage drama. But for both of us this feels like the middle of nowhere.
It would have been better to have met on the Isle of Skye, at a point where the mountains run down to the sea, the natural, dramatic backdrop for Young's film, Seachd: The Inaccessible Pinnacle.
The irony of the title is that the Bafta committee has decided that Seachd - a film with an incredible sense of place, released in Scotland this weekend - was something from the edge of nowhere and not worthy of nomination for the best foreign language film category in next year's Oscars.
"If another film had been selected, I would understand. But they're not putting any film forward," says Young who, with Seachd, manages to conjure 90 magical minutes of feature film out of a budget more appropriate to an average children's drama.
"Bafta were not being asked to say good, bad or indifferent - they're just the mechanism by which films are submitted to the Academy," Young says. "What I think happened is that six people got a copy of the film and very lazily half-watched it, flexed their muscles and decided they were the arbiters of taste. It's a very colonial attitude and very anti-Gaelic."
Shot on Skye, the film tells of the relationship between a young boy (Padruig Moreasdan) whose parents died on the mountains and his grandfather (Aonghas Padruig Caimbeul), who spins mythical yarns for the boy but hides the truth of his parents' death. Whirling between water horses and Spanish sailors from the armada, there aren't quite seven stories in there (Seachd is Gaelic for the magical numberseven)butthefilmisanincredible achievement and a milestone in Gaelic film-making. It's also a source of some pride and inspiration for its main funders, the Gaelic Media Service, which will launch a new television channel for the language early next year.
With its snub, Bafta may have done Young and Seachd a huge favour. The controversy over its omission from the Oscars, skilfully stoked by Young, has generatedcolumninchesinpublicationsasdiverseasTheGuardianandHollywoodentertainment bible Variety. It even helped persuade the Barbican to give the film a screening in London.
Young, who lives in Skye and has learned to speak Gaelic, has a long track record as a producer. His previous successes include Festival and Venus Peter and he has certainly managed to gather the talents for Seachd. Morag Stewart, the Gaelic-speaking associate producer, acted as casting director and conduit for director Simon Millar, while Angus MacKay, another Gael, finessed the editing in a suite in Stornoway rather than Soho.
Revenge could soon be Young's, however: Seachd has been invited to compete in the prestigious Rome Film Festival and word on the street is that Bafta Scotland, an associated but separate entity from Bafta, could nominate Seachd in its best film category.
Seachd is out now
|
|

Posted by: Neilus, Dublin on 9:07pm Sat 6 Oct 07
Particularly annoying when "Kings" the Irish Gaelic film is being tipped to be nominated as best foreign language film from Ireland. It has had a major amount of publicity, and is considered something to be proud of. I wonder if that would be the case if Ireland was still part of the British Isles, and therefore the decision was made by BAFTA (LONDON).
Particularly annoying when "Kings" the Irish Gaelic film is being tipped to be nominated as best foreign language film from Ireland. It has had a major amount of publicity, and is considered something to be proud of. I wonder if that would be the case if Ireland was still part of the British Isles, and therefore the decision was made by BAFTA (LONDON).
Posted by: George on 11:07pm Sat 6 Oct 07
Mr. Young is understandably disappointed that this film, made with over £600,000 of taxpayers money, has been rejected for an Oscar nomination.
I imagine that all of the organisations who contributed our money towards its production, as well as taxpayers, will feel the same way.
Sadly, the film failed to make the grade. "Variety" states that Bafta jurors were unanimous in their view that the film was not strong enough to go forward.
I understand, however, that the film contained some strong acting performances, including one by Mr. Young’s daughter.
I think the publicity arising from this snub will help increase audience figures for the film. I also think it would be unfortunate if the English director, Simon Miller, chose not to come north of the border again for any future endeavour in Gaelic.
Mr. Young is understandably disappointed that this film, made with over £600,000 of taxpayers money, has been rejected for an Oscar nomination.
I imagine that all of the organisations who contributed our money towards its production, as well as taxpayers, will feel the same way.
Sadly, the film failed to make the grade. "Variety" states that Bafta jurors were unanimous in their view that the film was not strong enough to go forward.
I understand, however, that the film contained some strong acting performances, including one by Mr. Young’s daughter.
I think the publicity arising from this snub will help increase audience figures for the film. I also think it would be unfortunate if the English director, Simon Miller, chose not to come north of the border again for any future endeavour in Gaelic.
Posted by: Exile, London on 12:05pm Sun 7 Oct 07
It appears that to most people no native language other than English exists in the UK. Any attempts of languages far older and more original to this country than English to make themselves heard are being stifled.
I am wondering if this film will be on show here in the the South of England or whether I will have to await its release on DVD to be able to watch it?
It appears that to most people no native language other than English exists in the UK. Any attempts of languages far older and more original to this country than English to make themselves heard are being stifled.
I am wondering if this film will be on show here in the the South of England or whether I will have to await its release on DVD to be able to watch it?
Posted by: Brian, Glasgow on 8:54pm Sun 7 Oct 07
I have yet to catch this film, but I am interested to see it. I find this debate a little strange though; to object to the film's exclusion from the "foreign language" category, as gaelic is not a Foreign language. Surely putting it in the foreign language category would be an example of colonial arrogance against what is a native Scottish/British language.
I have yet to catch this film, but I am interested to see it. I find this debate a little strange though; to object to the film's exclusion from the "foreign language" category, as gaelic is not a Foreign language. Surely putting it in the foreign language category would be an example of colonial arrogance against what is a native Scottish/British language.
Posted by: Valerie Smith, Sydney Australia on 6:34am Mon 8 Oct 07
If there is no other Foreign language film to be entered by BAFTA then it is difficult to see why “Seachd” has been denied entry…
I take Exiles point re Gaidhlig hardly being a Foreign language, but that’s hardly the worse that has been said of it…. to many of us, it was the language spoken by our Scottish Ancestors when they were ‘encouraged’ to leave Lochaber for Australia in the early 1800’s “read and writes but speaks little English” was the derogatory remark copied by the English clerk onto the Shipping list that brought him here.
Many of us out here in the Scottish Diaspora want this film to be viewed, it does not need to win, it just needs to be shown to the world, to prove that the language (though not us) still lives back there in the West Highland and Islands
If there is no other Foreign language film to be entered by BAFTA then it is difficult to see why “Seachd” has been denied entry…
I take Exiles point re Gaidhlig hardly being a Foreign language, but that’s hardly the worse that has been said of it…. to many of us, it was the language spoken by our Scottish Ancestors when they were ‘encouraged’ to leave Lochaber for Australia in the early 1800’s “read and writes but speaks little English” was the derogatory remark copied by the English clerk onto the Shipping list that brought him here.
Many of us out here in the Scottish Diaspora want this film to be viewed, it does not need to win, it just needs to be shown to the world, to prove that the language (though not us) still lives back there in the West Highland and Islands
Posted by: Iain, Glasgow on 1:17pm Mon 8 Oct 07
First Scottish Gaelic feature? What about As an Eilean (Mike Alexander, 1993)?
First Scottish Gaelic feature? What about As an Eilean (Mike Alexander, 1993)?
Posted by: Murdo, Glasgow on 2:45pm Mon 8 Oct 07
DO NOT LISTEN TO GEORGE! (he left a comment a few days back)
I believe he is either a Bafta employee, or a disgruntled actor who was turned down a part in the film, as i have seen him leave this comment on other pages, almost to the word, and it seems that he has a problem not with the film but the people behind it!
The film is spectaculor, i'm a gaelic speaker, and went into the cinema with very low expectations, but came out the other side absolutely won over!
Bafta are disgusting.
DO NOT LISTEN TO GEORGE! (he left a comment a few days back)
I believe he is either a Bafta employee, or a disgruntled actor who was turned down a part in the film, as i have seen him leave this comment on other pages, almost to the word, and it seems that he has a problem not with the film but the people behind it!
The film is spectaculor, i'm a gaelic speaker, and went into the cinema with very low expectations, but came out the other side absolutely won over!
Bafta are disgusting.
Posted by: TECWYN EVANS, ENGLAND on 2:11pm Wed 10 Oct 07
The award is for the best non English film. After all some people in America might consider England a forign country.
It is said that the film "Cariad Creulon was the contender for a nomination from Wales. The reviwers have not been too kind to this film. Personally they might have been too harsh and probably would do well in American.
Seachd on the other hand has an original story line and has been well received.
I too think that BAFTA has behaved in a disgusting way, probably because Seachd is much better than the English language film they have put foward.
The award is for the best non English film. After all some people in America might consider England a forign country.
It is said that the film "Cariad Creulon was the contender for a nomination from Wales. The reviwers have not been too kind to this film. Personally they might have been too harsh and probably would do well in American.
Seachd on the other hand has an original story line and has been well received.
I too think that BAFTA has behaved in a disgusting way, probably because Seachd is much better than the English language film they have put foward.
Posted by: Calum on 10:27am Thu 11 Oct 07
" I wonder if that would be the case if Ireland was still part of the British Isles"
Err Ireland is still a part of the British Isls. The British Isles is a geographical, not political, entity and independence from the UK has no bearing upon Irelands place within the archipelago.
" I wonder if that would be the case if Ireland was still part of the British Isles"
Err Ireland is still a part of the British Isls. The British Isles is a geographical, not political, entity and independence from the UK has no bearing upon Irelands place within the archipelago.
Posted by: Calum on 10:36am Thu 11 Oct 07
"DO NOT LISTEN TO GEORGE!"
Indeed, the guy is speaking nonsense. There has yet to appear a single negative review of the film. Variety, Times, Herald, Scotsman, The List, Daily Telegraph, The Guardian, BBC etc etc have all given extremely positive reviews of the film and the decision by BAFTA to actively work against British cinema (that is British cinema not in the English language) is absolutely disgraceful.
"DO NOT LISTEN TO GEORGE!"
Indeed, the guy is speaking nonsense. There has yet to appear a single negative review of the film. Variety, Times, Herald, Scotsman, The List, Daily Telegraph, The Guardian, BBC etc etc have all given extremely positive reviews of the film and the decision by BAFTA to actively work against British cinema (that is British cinema not in the English language) is absolutely disgraceful.
Posted by: JohnH, Glasgow on 1:10pm Fri 12 Oct 07
The reviews were Ok but generally said the film was lack lustre. Use the IMDB entry to find them. Of course everyone is now interested in the film for more I suspect than if it had have been nominated!
The reviews were Ok but generally said the film was lack lustre. Use the IMDB entry to find them. Of course everyone is now interested in the film for more I suspect than if it had have been nominated!
Posted by: Sasanach, Coventry on 2:00am Sat 13 Oct 07
I agree with Exile on the stifling issue. It makes me sad that some people are so blinkered.
I want to see Seachd too, but I can't see any cinemas in Coventry showing it. I keep asking at the Warwick University Arts Centre. Maybe if I try hard enough?
Wish me luck!
I agree with Exile on the stifling issue. It makes me sad that some people are so blinkered.
I want to see Seachd too, but I can't see any cinemas in Coventry showing it. I keep asking at the Warwick University Arts Centre. Maybe if I try hard enough?
Wish me luck!
Posted by: sam on 7:09pm Sat 27 Oct 07
hi i am on the tv drama at school.they came to my school and i am in a few episodes. itson in january on E4. hope u like it .
hi i am on the tv drama at school.they came to my school and i am in a few episodes. itson in january on E4. hope u like it .
Posted by: eadar-lion, alba on 3:57pm Fri 16 Nov 07
direach craicte eh