Home
October 16, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Tide of sentiment begins to turn for HBOS shares
Analysts admit Scottish banking giant’s low market valuation is ‘getting silly’
By Ian Fraser

OVERWHELMING BACKING LAST WEEK FOR HBOS'S £4 BILLION rights issue is being seen by analysts this weekend as a turning point in the Scottish bank's fortunes. Thursday's vote, in which 98% of shareholders supported the initiative, may mark the beginning of the end of the credit crunch troubles that have turned the Edinburgh-based institution into Britain's most beleaguered large bank.

The green light came even though the bank's share price has plunged below the price at which shareholders are expected to buy "discounted" shares.

At 275p each, the discounted shares probably looked attractive on April 29 when the two-for-five rights issue process was announced. At that time HBOS's share price was 495.75p. This meant that shareholders would have been able to buy their new shares at a 45% discount. Now it looks increasingly likely that underwriters Morgan Stanley and Dresdner Kleinwort will end up having to buy £4bn worth of new shares for a price higher than their actual value.

But research into analyst sentiment by the Sunday Herald found a marked turning of the tide in HBOS's favour. Many are now prepared to agree with Lord Stevenson, HBOS's chairman, that a "disconnect" has emerged between HBOS's share price and its likely financial performance in both 2008 and 2009.

HBOS's shares have collapsed by 76% since February 2007. Having peaked at 1153p on February 23, 2007, they closed on Friday at 275p.

The valuation of the shares by the market suggests investors believe the UK is about to enter a long and painful recession as bad as, if not worse than, that seen in 1990 to 1992.

If such an Armageddon scenario, which would include a 20% to 30% fall in UK house prices and a surge in unemployment, were to transpire, HBOS would be in serious trouble. Both retail and corporate borrowers could be expected to default in droves.

However, James Eden, an analyst at Exane BNP Paribas, argued that such a scenario was very unlikely. "With the HBOS share price languishing at 275p, I would agree that there is a disconnect between economic reality and the share price. I hope I'm right, because the sort of economic scenario implied by the current share price looks pretty ugly."

Alex Potter, an analyst at Collins Stewart, said HBOS's current share price reflects an assumption that there would be a 1990s-style recession in the UK, further writedowns from HBOS and that the private-equity industry will endure massive losses. But he does not believe these things will happen.

Potter said: "The current share price implies HBOS will never again generate a return above its cost-of-capital, a situation that we feel that regulators and/or consolidators would be unlikely to allow to persist. It also implies a further £6.1bn of net losses in the bank and zero growth generation."

While Potter attacked the apparent inability of the HBOS board to provide greater visibility about its future earnings, he said the bank was not unique in this. "There are a lot of things I dislike about this bank, but every asset has its price, and the price at which HBOS is currently trading is getting silly."

Potter does not believe the Edinburgh bank will make a loss either in the current year or in 2009. In fact, he estimates it will make profits of £3.3bn in 2008, £4.9bn in 2009 and £5.2bn in 2010. The 2008 figure represents a fall of almost 40% from the £5.4bn actual profit made by HBOS in the year to December 2007.

Richard Barnes, analyst at Standard & Poor's, said: "HBOS's profitability should remain reasonably robust due to better pricing on new lending, tight cost management and stable performances from the insurance businesses.

"The benefit of wider asset spreads will be offset in 2008 by higher funding costs, but should drive a stable or increasing net interest margin in 2009-2010 as more loans re-price. This is an important mitigant to the higher impairment losses that we expect in those years."

On Thursday, Lord Stevenson lashed out at UK regulators for failing to deal with white-collar crime, including stock market manipulation followed by short selling, which is believed to be one reason that HBOS shares have sunk.

However, Colin McLean, chief executive of SVM Asset Management, said Lord Stevenson was wrong to blame hedge funds for what are more intrinsic problems at the bank.  He said: "That's a smokescreen. It's up to the bank to reassure investors about its prospects and strategy."

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: John Riley, London on 9:24pm Sat 28 Jun 08
Lord Stevenson complains that the regulatory authorities have failed to stamp out 'white collar' crime, yet in the summer of 2007 HBOS's CO Andy Hornby was trumpeting the claim that his bank's shares were "a steal" to buy.

Had anyone taken his advice and bought the bank's stock on the bet that they would rise in value, they would be now be nursing heavy losses.

The bank's hypocrisy knows no bounds: it thinks nothing of trumpeting the claim that the bank's shares are the best thing since sliced haggis, but berates the stock seller for selling short in the belief that the value of the shares will fall!

Which white collar crime is greater?







Posted by: Between The Lines, Scotland on 9:14am Sun 29 Jun 08
The whole sentiment of this article smacks of desperation, as any savvy investor will realise. The article is attempting, and failing, to talk-up a rights issue that is effectively dead in the water. A valuation of £1.50 for these "junk-rated" shares looks more likely in the short term. Buy them at your peril!
Posted by: BRYAN SWEENEY, AYR on 10:53am Sun 29 Jun 08
Article seems to be sober assessment of HBOS share price.
Already the rights marker is 15P higher than HBOS share price.
The recovery could be very rapid causing massive hit to shorting hedge funds.
Posted by: John Perry, Hampshire on 2:57pm Sun 29 Jun 08
Do not forget that the directors of HBOS prevented many investors from participating in the demutualisation process. I personally am pleased that the directors are now suffering heavy losses in the value of their share holding.
Posted by: Sheila Gibb, Canada on 8:49pm Sun 29 Jun 08
More persons not getting to participate in "demutualisation" just like millions of us Scots living in exile.
This "financial services plan" dreamt up by "industry experts" colluding with the Eu bureaucrats needs INVESTIGATING. The widespread corruption it has caused globally on the markets is not funny!
Strangley enough every one of these so-called Wise Men had links on the boards / executive teams of clearing houses / stock echanges, institutional investment banks and or companies / industries that were being listed on the stock exchanges (including power. water, energy and investment firms)
WHEN is this CORRUPTION going to be investigated, including the embezzlenent of billions of endowment policyholders assets for the benefit of a few greedy grubby b-st-rds with d-cks in the finance industry!
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login