Home
May 12, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
America ‘poised to strike at Iran’s nuclear sites’ from bases in Bulgaria and Romania
Report suggest that ‘US defensive ring’ may be new front in war on terror. By Gabriel Ronay

PRESIDENT BUSH is preparing to attackIran'snuclearfacilities before the end of April and the US Air Force's new bases in Bulgaria and Romania would be used as back-up in the onslaught, according to an official report from Sofia.

"American forces could be using their two USAF bases in Bulgaria and one at Romania's Black Sea coast to launch an attack on Iran in April," the Bulgarian news agency Novinite said.

TheAmericanbuild-upalongthe BlackSea,coupledwiththerecent positioningoftwoUSaircraftcarrier battle groups off the Straits of Hormuz, appears to indicate president Bush has run out of patience with Tehran's nuclear misrepresentation and non-compliance with the UN Security Council's resolution. President Ahmeninejad of Iran has further ratcheted up tension in the region by putting on show his newly purchased state of the art Russian TOR-Ml anti-missile defence system.

Whether the Bulgarian news report is a tactical feint or a strategic event is hard to gauge at this stage. But, in conjunctionwiththebeefingupofAmerica'sItalian bases and the acquisition of anti-missiledefencebasesintheCzech RepublicandPoland,theBalkan developments seem toindicateanewphase in Bush's global war on terror.

Sofia'snewsofadvancedwar preparationsalongtheBlackSeais backed up by some chilling details. One isthesettingupofnewrefuellingplaces for US Stealth bombers, which would spearhead an attack on Iran. "The USAF's positioning of vital refuelling facilities for its B-2 bombers in unusual places, includingBulgaria,fallswithinthe perspective of such an attack." NovinitenamedcolonelSam Gardiner, "a US secret service officer stationed in Bulgaria", as the source of this revelation.

Curiously,thereportnotedthat although Tony Blair, Bush's main ally in the global war on terror, would be leaving office, the president had opted to press on with his attack on Iran in April.

BeforetheendofMarch,3000US militarypersonnelarescheduledto arrive "on a rotating basis" at America's Bulgarian bases. Under the US-Bulgarian military co-operation accord, signed in April,2006,anairbaseatBezmer, a second airfield at Graf Ignitievo and a shooting range at Novo Selo were leased toAmerica.Significantly,lastyear'sbases negotiations had at one point run into difficulties due to Sofia's demand "for advance warning if Washington intends to use Bulgarian soil for attacks against other nations, particularly Iran".

Romania, the other Black Sea host to theUSmilitary,isenjoyingadollarbonanzaasitsMihailKogalniceanu base at Constanta is being transformed into an American "place d'arme". It is alsovitaltotheIranscenario.

Lastweek,theBucharestdaily Evenimentual Zilei revealed the USAF is to site several flights of F-l5, F-l6 and Al0 aircraftattheKogalniceanubase.AdmiralGheorgheMarin,Romania's chief of staff, confirmed "up to 2000 Americanmilitarypersonnelwillbe temporarily stationed in Romania".

InCentralEurope,theCzech Republic and Poland have also found themselves in the Pentagon's strategic focus. Last week, Mirek Topolanek, the Czech prime minister, and the country's national security council agreed to the siting of a US anti-missile radar defence system at Nepolisy. Poland has also agreed to having a US anti-missile missilebase and interceptoraircraft stationedinthecountry.

Russia, however, does not see the chain of new US bases on its doorstep as a "defensive ring". Russia's defence chief has branded the planned US anti-missile missile sites on Czech and Polish soil as "an open threat to Russia".

SergeyIvanov,Russia'sdefence minister,spokemorecircumspectly while emphasising Moscow's concern. Hesaid:"Russiaisnotworried.Itsstrategicnuclearforcescanassureinanycircumstanceitssafety.Since neither Tehran,norPyongyangpossess intercontinentalmissilescapableof threatening the USA, from whom is this new missile shield supposed to protect the West? All it actually amounts to is that Prague and Warsaw want to demonstrate their loyalty to Washington."

Bush's Iran attack plan has brought into sharp focus the possible costs to Central and Eastern Europe of being "pillars of Pax Americana".

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: U.S. Artist General on 5:13pm Mon 29 Jan 07
A WEAPONS-GRADE QUESTION? STARTING A PRE-EMPTIVE-WAR-STOPPING FIRESTORM ON THE EVE OF ATTACKING IRAN--i.e., imagine 'Vice Precedent' Cheney responding: "it's out of line...I'm a Public Servant in a Free-Market Economy"...

Re: Empowering the People

"You're either with us or against us"...

from THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY GUARDIAN

An independent, locally owned and edited newspaper

"IT IS A NEWSPAPER'S DUTY TO PRINT THE NEWS AND RAISE ****."

--Wilbur Storey, Statement of the aims of the Chicago Times, 1861.

Trail Mix

~Steven T. Jones

Sept 29--Oct 5 2004

" Artist General's Warning: Recu$al question could be bad for Bush's political health...

...The question is this:

Will you agree never to accept
any personal profits flowing from any military action you authorize or promote?

Masley has been harassing journalists all over the country, trying to get them to ask it of Bush and the rest of his war cabinet...

...After all,

Vice President Dick Cheney has profited

handsomely

from actions he took as Poppy Bush's secretary of defense, most notably deciding to outsource many military functions and then becoming CEO of Halliburton, which then got the no-bid contracts to do that work.

Who knows, maybe mainstream journalists might even begin questioning why a war cabinet of Texas oilmen lied their way into occupying some of the most oil-rich regions of the world. Or maybe that's asking too much. "

http://www.sfbg.com/38/53/x_trail_mix.html

WHOA! Takin' us to WAR?

~You ForGOT to "ReCU$E" Yourselves!

AND NOW
TO A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION
OF RIGHT & WRONG
WAITING

LIKE AN ELEPHANT IN THE BUSH-ESTATE
FORTUNE$-O'-WAR ROOM

MORAL ARGUMENT(S)
AGAINST ASKING IT?

~NONE.

WATCHIN' 'EM SQUIRM?
PRICELESS.

"ANYBODY-WANT-SOME-WOOD?"

--W, "nervously", in debate with Kerry
Re: Presidential Portfolia,
Conflict of interest question...

CRAMP THEIR GUILE

Imperfect but Plausibly-"Effective" Compliance
to be "Increasingly" Monitored by the Blogosphere:


WE THE VAST MAJORITY APPROVE THIS 'QUESTION'

Don't Believe it, Media?

Poll the Nation & See for Yourselves...

FROM PATRIOTS FOR A FAIR
CONTRACT WITH AMERICA:

AN "OATH" OF MARTIAL OFFICE

FOR A DEMOCRACY: A MODEST PROPOSAL INDEED

To Strike or Not-to-Strike?
~A Potentially National
Moral Funnybone

In Requesting of Public Servants Exercising Fatal Authority In Our Name A Formal

"DECLARATION OF DISOWNERSHIP"

--A For-the-Record Concession That
NO ENTITLEMENT EXISTS

to Present or Future Personal Profit 'Demonstrably Connected' to Any War (or Bloodshed) Authorized, Promoted, Advanced or Otherwise "Engaged on Their Watch":

We the People Hold Ourselves
Deserving of "An Explanation"

Should the Answer to This "Recu$al-for-Life" Question be "No".

If the Answer is "Yes",
Then Be It Understood:

Martial Planner Agrees to Surrender-on-Demand
Said Profit--
(Deliberate or "Unintentional", Exposed or "Discovered")
to Veteran Benefit Groups, College Funds For Children of the Fallen, etc...

TRUTH TO POWER:

Healthy for the Media,
Good for Democracy--

Bad for "Our Due" Mind$et
Public Servants

MORAL MULTI-TASKING:

~A Question of Courage
in a Measure of Character~~For the Asking!

Reposted July '06 @:

http://www.kyndmusic.com/2006/07/01/artist-general-warning-recusal-question-bad-for-bush/

Posted by: James Waugh on 8:05pm Mon 29 Jan 07
No doubt Blair will be wetting himself in anticipation.
Posted by: Gabriela Oates on 5:31am Tue 30 Jan 07
The actual source of the news is the Kuwait-based daily Arab Times, see the link:
http://www.arabtimesonline.com/arabtimes/kuwait/Viewdet.asp?ID=9548&cat=a.

I'd love to see the "official report from Sofia" cited by the author. All I could find in the Bulgarian-language press is a news report aptly titled "Scottish Paper Involves Us in Military Action against Iran"...
Posted by: Richard z., South Dakota on 8:17pm Wed 14 Feb 07
Jesus Christ is ordering Bush to attack Iran in April. Jesus the so called Prince of Peace. I hate God.
Posted by: John Wayne, Dallas, TEXAS on 1:11am Tue 20 Feb 07
While it brings me no joy, I mist say that there is no point in delaying the INEVITABLE clash with Iran.

Iran is a belligerent theocracy **** that supplies weapons to terrorists inside Iraq battling American forces...these are ACTS OF WAR!

Iran is a state sponsor of terror as indicated by their support of Hezbollahs.

The sooner this CANCER upon our planet, called Iran, is excised, the better for all humanity!

I only hope that this time we use REAL shock and awe!!!

LETS GET IT ON!!!
Posted by: helios, Cincinnati. OH on 11:06pm Sun 25 Feb 07
This "news report" is a complete hoax. First of all, like Gabriela said, there is NO Bulgarian news report about this. All I read was that the Sunday Herald wrote this and it was quoted. I'm sure it's some crazy person trying to see how the international community is going to react to this b.s. And you should all know by now that the B-2 bombers NEVER land anywhere outside the USA, they take off from either Florida, Nevada or Missouri and refill their tanks in the air. The US is never going to allow a 2 billion dollar plane to land outside its territory. So it's a complete lie. Also, Congress will never fund such an operation. So rest assured. The USA is not attacking Iran, let alone by using its newest allies.
Posted by: Wildframe, Magnetic ISland on 8:06am Sat 31 Mar 07
Actually, this story stems from the Russian news and Information Agency English edition website in a story titled: "U.S. ready to strike Iran in early April - intelligence source -1"

http://en.rian.ru/world/20070330/62861432.html
Posted by: Katrina, United Kingdom on 3:22pm Wed 4 Apr 07
Iran must not have nuclear weapons, countrys like Iran are run by dictitorial, evil religious extreamists who want the U.S. and the U.K. destroyed. The capture of Royal Navy sailors by Iranian forces last week just shows how far Iran will go and sooner or later War will come.
The full name for Iran is the Islamic Republic of Iran, its laws are based on that of their religion, when politics and religion mix you get war and terrorism.
An all out invasion of Iran wouldn't help anyone but Air and Naval strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and military bases is needed. It is obvious that the Iranians are supplying Iraqi malitia that are killing British and American soldiers so i believe we must bomb Iran off the face of the planet.
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login