Home
July 04, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
A Right Madam

The publication of details from an alleged brothel-keeper’s phone book has left Washington DC’s Republican politicians trembling. The scandal has already claimed its first scalp. By Andrew Purcell

FOR 12 years, Deborah Jeane Palfrey kept a record of every phone number dialled by her business. She claims that Pamela Martin & Associates was a "high-end adult fantasy firm which offered legal sexual and erotic services" to wealthy Washington DC patrons. This week, having secured the permission of the judge in her trial for running a £150-an-hour brothel, her lawyers released those phone lists to anyone who wanted them. It has been a nervous few days for the capital's most libidinous politicians.

"Once more analysis is done, more names will come out," promised her lawyer, Montgomery Blair Sibley.

The "DC Madam" scandal has been a staple of congressional gossip for months but on Monday it claimed its first senator. David Vitter is an old-fashioned, God-fearing, family-values conservative from Louisiana who has built his platform on opposition to abortion in any circumstances, including cases of rape and incest.

Tipped off that Hustler magazine was about to link him to the alleged prostitution ring, Vitter released a classic sackcloth and ashes statement: "This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible," it began.

"Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counselling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there - with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way."

Shortly after this show of penitence, Hustler publisher Larry Flynt claimed the scalp for himself, in a press release which boasted that "within hours of obtaining the phone records, Flynt's team found what ABC News has so far been unable to ferret out".

ABC will be ruing a missed opportunity. The network's star investigative reporter, Brian Ross, was handed the last four years of Palfrey's phone records in March but decided the high-ranking army officers, federal investigators and World Bank officials he found "weren't newsworthy enough" to name.

Randall Tobias, a deputy secretary of state, resigned the day after being confronted, before Ross could out him.

The revelation that Tobias was an escort service regular set the tone for a story that the Republican Party, in particular, is finding difficult to shake. It is not about the act of paying for sex, but the stunning hypocrisy of the men who were doing so.

In his role as the head of the Bush administration's Agency for International Development, Tobias was responsible for allocating overseas aid, including payments to organisations attempting to stop the spread of the HIV virus. Under his direction, the agency withheld money from NGOs until they introduced strict anti-prostitution policies. He promoted the ABC approach to sexual health: A for Abstinence, B for Be faithful to your partner and C for Condoms as a last resort.

"This was a guy leading a crackdown on prostitution worldwide," Ross said. "The fact that he was a repeat customer of this and other services, the hypocrisy made that important."

This has been the abiding principle of Larry Flynt's campaign, which began in June with a full-page advert in the Washington Post, offering up to $1 million for "documented evidence of illicit sexual or intimate relations with a congressperson, senator or other prominent officeholder".

The pornographer is making no claim to the moral high ground when it comes to sex but, as he observed at a press conference on Wednesday: "When someone is living a lie contrary to the way they are advocating in their public lives, they become fair game."

Vitter, he continued, "is to the right of Attila the Hun every step of the way. Unfortunately, there are too many of these guys in Congress, and I am going to do my part in getting them out of there. I don't want a man like that legislating for me, especially in areas of morality. This is payback time."

Vitter is particularly vulnerable to the charge of hypocrisy because the sanctity of marriage is such a fundamental component of his political agenda. "Marriage is a core institution of societies throughout the world and throughout history," he said recently.

"It's something that has provided permanence and stability for our very social structure."

Vitter co-authored a proposed amendment to the constitution that would have made civil unions illegal nationwide. When he was asked to list his primary concerns after Hurricane Katrina had levelled huge swathes of his Louisiana constituency, he replied without hesitation that gay marriage was the greatest threat facing America.

He was also one of Bill Clinton's most outspoken critics during the Monica Lewinsky affair, arguing that if Congress failed to impeach the president on moral grounds, "his leadership will only further drain any sense of values left to our political culture".

Vitter can be thankful that relatively few of his supporters have reached the same conclusions about his own fitness to govern. Vincent Bruno, of Kenner, a former New Orleans police chief, said the senator should resign "for his own good, the good of the party and the good of his family", but generally Louisiana's Republicans are prepared to forgive, and inclined to forget his indiscretions as quickly as possible.

"I'm very disappointed, but I think this is a family matter and I'm praying for him," said state representative Kay Katz, adding: "I support things that Senator Vitter has advocated and will continue to support those things."

The Reverend Mark Foster told his local paper, the News Star, that "if God has forgiven him so surely can I."

The Reverend Billy McCormack, leader of the Louisiana Christian Coalition, concluded that "Senator Vitter may well be much more able as a senator now than before because people tend to learn from their mistakes when they are responsible. I will continue to support him fervently."

Vitter has been in hiding all week, holed up with his family as new claims emerged that he paid weekly visits to prostitutes in New Orleans over a period of several years.

Jeanette Maier told Associated Press that in the mid-1990s Vitter was a regular at the Canal Street brothel she ran with her mother and her daughter.

"I'm not out to ruin a marriage," she said. "I want his wife to see what a wonderful man he is.

"He is a decent guy. He's not a freak. He's not using drugs. I know he's not a person that would down-talk a woman. I know that he's respectful. I want his kids to know he's a good father. Just because he had sex out of wedlock - so what? At least he stayed with his kids."

Larry Flynt claims to be in contact with five women who will testify that they had sex with the senator for a share of Hustler's $1 million reward but, even if they can all prove the truth of the allegation, it might not be enough to derail Vitter's political career.

Three key factors count in his favour. First, he is not up for re-election until 2010, and three years is a long time in politics. Second, the Democrats don't have a credible challenger in Louisiana. Third, the state has such an inglorious history of corruption and sleaze that voters have come to expect, and tolerate, bad behaviour from congressmen.

Vitter was elected to the House Of Representatives in 1999, after an adultery scandal led to the resignation of his predecessor, Bob Livingston. In the mid-term elections of 2006, Democrat William Jefferson won re-election to Congress, six months after FBI officers allegedly taped him soliciting a bribe and found $90,000 of cash hidden in his freezer.

Edwin Edwards, the only man to serve four terms as Louisiana governor, was dogged by accusations of corruption throughout his time in office. He was caught paying gambling debts with suitcases full of money and stood trial for mail fraud, obstruction of justice and bribery. He once boasted that the only way he could lose an election was to be "caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy". In 1991, he was elected for the final time, after supporters produced a bumper sticker reading "Vote For The Crook. It's Important." He is currently serving 10 years for fraud and extortion.

Even if he does survive in the Senate, Vitter still has reason to worry. Seven years ago, when his wife Wendy was asked by the Times-Picayune newspaper if she could forgive infidelity should her husband stray, she replied: "I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary Clinton. If he does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not alimony, trust me." For now, she is standing by her man.

Vitter's fall is a blow to Rudy Giuliani's presidential bid, because he is the former New York Mayor's southern campaign chairman. Giuliani has been married three times, twice too many for the Republican base, and he can ill-afford to lose more heartland votes. The wider political significance of the scandal depends on who else appears on the phone records of Pamela Martin & Associates.

Ever since they were released, teams of volunteers from anti-George Bush activist group Citizens For Legitimate Government have been calling every number on the list and posting the results online.

Spokeswoman Lori Price said: "I believe it will make a difference politically because of the pattern, the cumulative effect of so many people that are espousing conservatism and family values being caught lying.

"A crime is a crime, but it's so much more egregious if you're preaching against it beforehand. There's a burgeoning anger in the United States at the hypocrisy and double-standards of this government. The Libby pardon is part of the same illness. The Foley page scandal is part of the same illness."

In September 2006, Republican congressman Mark Foley, a prominent campaigner against child pornography, resigned after sexually explicit messages that he sent to a teenage office assistant were made public. In November, leading evangelical pastor Ted Haggard admitted to being "a deceiver and a liar" after a gay prostitute revealed that Haggard had paid him for sex and crystal methamphetamine.

There is a clear parallel to be drawn with John Major's ill-fated "back to basics" initiative. The indiscretions of David Mellor, Tim Yeo, Neil Hamilton, and Jonathan Aitken contributed to a pervasive sense that Major's government could not be trusted, thus creating the conditions for Tony Blair's sweeping election victory in 1997.

With Larry Flynt playing the role of Max Clifford, the Democrats will be hoping for further scandals before the United States goes to the polls next year.

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: john smith, http://jairusotieno. blogspot.com on 2:01am Sun 15 Jul 07
One reason this story is yet to blow up is the mainstream media's refusal to write about the kinky nature of Senators Vitter's relationship with the Canal Street hookers.
It has been reported on the Net and by blogs that the hookers say he liked to be dressed in diapers. There is also a story about an illegitimate child with another woman.
If the values voters would read this too and not just the hooker angle, maybe more people would realize just how hypocritical this senator has been.Its all over the net yet not one mention in this story which is why he'll get away with it just like he did the illegitimate child story in 2004. Read all about it here http://jairusotieno.
blogspot.com
Posted by: Alan, UK on 7:15am Sun 15 Jul 07
"Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counselling."

The Reverend Mark Foster told his local paper, the News Star, that "if God has forgiven him so surely can I."

Re. the above. I wonder what form these communications from God came in. Divine revelation, e-mail or fax. If the senator and the reverend have in fact established a "hotline" to God perhaps they could establish a few details about the afterlife, the nature of existence etc.
Posted by: Los Angeles, Edinburgh on 11:58am Sun 15 Jul 07
"Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife
Good grief. Don't tell me they were having an illicit affair!
Posted by: jock, Florida on 3:13pm Sun 15 Jul 07
Why does the headline say,"Republican politicians are trembling," Is he implying that Democratic politicians aren't involved also?
Posted by: Catharine, Winnipeg, Canada on 4:28pm Sun 15 Jul 07
OF course there were probably Democrats using this service, but they haven't been running around for 6.5 years claiming to have direct access to a god who tells them how evil women, gays, muslims and anyone who doesn't tow the line in their particular brand of cosmic mumbojumbo. The Democrats haven't been espousing so-called "family values" or withholding aid money to starving people because they aren't the right sort of "christian." Very few people would care that the senator was getting his rocks off with a hooker - although the diaper angle is just plain weird! -but they do care about the hypocrisy and blatant lies spewing forth from the GOP.
Posted by: Alex McG on 5:08pm Sun 15 Jul 07
Is this the Great American Way of Life that we are all supposed to envy? These are the same people who, guided by God, would force their Religious Beliefs and Morality on the rest of us under the law. Tell me where that differs from Islam and Shari Law these same people constantly attack. The great US of A is run by a bunch of hypocritical religious bigots and the people refuse to throw them out. Says a lot about the American People.

What about the views of us sane Agnostics who share this planet with people of all faiths and beliefs We do not interfere with your chosen way of life nor do we send missionaries to convert you to our beliefs. We prefer to let the truth stand up for itself.

It is my belief the US of A is terminally ill with an incurable dose of religion of the Christian variety and is hell-bent on a cataclysmic collision with a more than willing Islam.
Posted by: Gerald Oleson, Maine on 8:41pm Sun 15 Jul 07
jock wrote:
Why does the headline say,"Republican politicians are trembling," Is he implying that Democratic politicians aren't involved also?
Dimocrats are no better than the Repugs, but I think his point was that the Repugs are the ones going around espousing family values, the glory of John Hagee, etc...It's the hypocrisy that he is addressing...
Posted by: Sean on 7:40pm Mon 16 Jul 07
http://www.mapbuilde
r.net/users/sfinn/47
305

Map of DC Hotels and calls for the 'Madam'
Posted by: J Williams, Baton Rouge , La. USA on 11:38pm Mon 16 Jul 07
Vitter's relationship with hookers continued up until the 2004 elections or so the story goes from the staff of another Louisiana Congressman at the time. Rodney Alexander's staff that quit when he changed parties came home to Monroe, La. and Alexandria telling stories of a hooker named Wendy and the then Rep. David Vitter...in fact it is said that Vitter was rather over joyed that this hooker's name was Wendy so he would not have to worry about calling out her name when he was with his wife.
Posted by: Los Angeles, Edinburgh on 5:45pm Tue 17 Jul 07
Catharine points out the glaring hypocracy of Christain soldiers, and a few Jews, Republicans and NeoCons alike:
Democrats used this service, but they have not run around for years claiming to have direct access to a god who tells them how evil women, gays, muslims and anyone who doesn't tow the line in their particular brand of cosmic mumbojumbo.
Posted by: lawgrace.org on 1:43am Fri 10 Aug 07
What part don’t I understand?! How come I don’t share the view, and what reason do I think that the people who repeatedly assert that Vitter’s ‘apology’ to his wife, his God, and his family translates into ‘end of story’? How come I think such a perspective is STUPID; and how come I think Vitter’s apparent DEMAND that the public regard (according to him, HIS PAST)– Vitter’s affairs with prostitutes as something involving only his family and his religion? How come the more I hear his demand that the public go about its business and forget about what Vitter says is now “behind” him, the more infuriated I become to the point of needing to speak mind, WELL LET ME COUNT THE WAYS:

#1 Although I don’t think Vitter merits any of my valuable time, his INSULT upon common sense ask people to ignore the obvious: When a public official –including a Judge on the bench, has an illicit or any lifestyle which requires or required sneaking around, other people know about it; and buying people off -HUSH MONEY, trading favors, quid pro quo is usually factored into maintaining such SLIPPINGS & SLIDINGS. And even if Vitter only used his personal finances to pay for his illicit past time, favors, special job positions, and perks at the public’s expense are GIFTS THAT KEEP ON GIVING. It is anyone’s guess how much PORK BARREL was traded.

#2 Even now, despite he says his prostitution stints are in the past, the DC Madam exposure caused him to go out of public view prior to his press conference. His remaining out of sight, caused him to miss votes on Louisiana’s behalf in Washington on significant bills. And Vitter’s personal gratification takes precedence over the duty owed to his elected office.

#3 It is beyond ironic that, despite New Orleans’ (and the entire State of Louisiana) status of poverty and health care deficits, the majority of people voicing their “support” for Vitter are wealthy, and not likely to be affected by social-economics. It is further ironic that Hurricanes Rita and Katrina caused Louisiana’s social conditions to become exposed, while regard for addressing poverty conditions was literally never heard from Vitter’s platform.

#4 In light of the dismaying manner that Attorney General Charles Foti (also sometimes referred to as one of the 3 Stooges) has allowed Louisiana to function in manifest economic oppression with utter lack of concern for enforcing Consumer Protection Laws, and in light of civil judicial corruption, which mostly MINORITIES are afflicted, if Vitter paid attention to poverty, perhaps conditions would not have resulted in the well-recognized New Orleans labels: HAVES and HAVE NOTS. Vitter’s Christian values seem to omit the precept from Proverbs 30:8-9, which says: “Give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with food convenient for me: Lest I be full, and deny thee, and say, Who is the LORD? or lest I be poor, and steal.”

#5 I feel certain that whether or not Representative William J. Jefferson is guilty of wrongdoing, he also has apologized to his loved ones and his God for any reproach or heartache resultant from intentional or unintentional deeds. But Jefferson is being made to face consequences and answer changes. Why should it be any different for Vitter? Prostitution does not cease to be a crime because of an apology. And it is absurd to IGNORE that some racketeering was REQUIRED in order to maintain Vitter’s activities. Vitter’s offices should be searched like Jefferson’s. Wendy Vitter’s acceptance and admiration for her husband shows she was not adversely affected by any infractions. But the people of Louisiana were and still are affected by Vitter’s peccadillos!
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login