Home
August 20, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
"An armed America is a polite America"
Welcome to Bullitt County, Kentucky, where a country at war celebrates the deadliest firearms civilians can buy. By Andrew Marshall

RICHARD PARKER has a problem with his 50-calibre sniper's rifle, but firepower isn't it. Made by Hampshire-based company Accuracy International, the rifle's cigar-sized bullet reputedly slams into distant targets with more force than Dirty Harry's famous .44 Magnum at point-blank range.

"With the right ammunition," muses Parker, an amiable 57-year-old marketing executive from Indiana, "you can take out a tank." Accuracy isn't the problem either: Parker can hit a skull-sized target at 2000 yards.

No, his problem is this: where do you fire a weapon of such heart-stopping power and range that American gun-control advocates believe it poses a serious threat to post-9/11 national security? Answer: Knob Creek Range in Kentucky, home to world's largest machine-gun show, a three-day blast-fest which is - outside of actual combat - an unrivalled display of the deadliest firearms ever made.

Knob Creek is in a place called - appropriately enough - Bullitt County. A former munitions test-site tucked into a cleft in the hills, its main range is about 300 metres long and is littered with old cars, boats, refrigerators, cookers, washing machines and gas cylinders. None of these targets last long under the withering gunfire unleashed by dozens of shooters in 30-minute bursts. "Ready on the left?" announces the shoot director over the PA system. "Ready on the right? Okay, let's rock and roll!"

For the uninitiated, what you hear next is a crashing wall of noise, unendurable without ear-protection. Only an expert can isolate and savour the snap and crackle of specific weapons: Gatling, Thompson, Browning, Heckler & Koch, Sten, Uzi, M16, AK47. Then there's the mini-gun, with its six whirring barrels firing up to 6000 rounds a minute. It vomits out bullet-casings, and is painfully loud: imagine someone slowly cutting your ears off with an unmuffled chainsaw.

Stacked high on tables behind the shooters are boxes and clips of live ammunition, including tracer and armour-piercing rounds. On Friday, during a break in the shooting, spectators are allowed into the range to stroll dumbstruck amid colandered fridges and cookers. Some form a reverential huddle around a burnt-out, bullet-peppered Ford Lexington. Many spectators will try out the weapons themselves. An M249 light machine gun - known as an Iraqi Street Sweeper' by American soldiers - costs more than a buck a bullet to fire. The mini-gun is $650 for 1200 rounds, the most expensive 12 seconds of your life.

For American gun-lovers, Knob Creek is a high-decibel declaration of their constitutional right to bear arms, including modern military weapons with a killing potential unimagined by the Second Amendment's 18th-century authors. While only a tiny percentage of gun-owners have such high-powered firearms, the entire community tends to support them, fearful that any legislation passed to outlaw machine guns might eventually be used against hand-guns and hunting rifles. Gun-control is another divisive issue in a nation already deeply polarised by Bush's Iraq misadventure and ultra-conservative policies.

Richard Parker is here with his brother Bill, 54, a big guy in a grubby white T-shirt. They call themselves the Boom Brothers.

The Boom Brothers' private arsenal is entirely legal and includes: three belt-fed Browning machine guns; a Colt M4 carbine used by US Special Forces for close-quarters combat; two Colt AR15s assault rifles, cousins of the ubiquitous M16; four large-calibre sniper's rifles, one fitted with a silencer; and a Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine gun, often featured in action movies and video games. Back in the trailer they've also left a futuristic-looking Bushmaster rifle, a Browning Automatic Rifle, a fully automatic Uzi, and some AK47s.

"We've got a bunch of pistols, too," remembers Richard, "but I won't get into that." All told, the weapons are worth more than half a million dollars. But Richard vows, "We'll never trade or get rid of any of them."

"They're like our little children," says Bill.

Bill is a private investigator who lives on a Caribbean island. While Knob Creek attracts both serving and retired soldiers, plus its fair share of freaks, video-game geeks, rednecks and militiamen, this is an expensive hobby and many shooters are doctors, lawyers and other highly paid professionals. It usually takes Bill Parker hours to get his machine guns checked through US airports, but only because they fascinate the security staff, who are often former cops or soldiers. "Americans have a love affair with guns," he explains.

And what about the ammunition - how does he transport that? "I ship it by UPS," says Bill. Over the three-day shoot, the Boom Brothers will fire tens of thousands of rounds, worth thousands of dollars. "Our record is about 40,000 rounds," grins Richard.

So how does your average, law-abiding American get his hands on a machine gun? The hardest part is a three to six-month raft of background checks, finger-printing and paperwork involving local police, the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

Actually finding a licensed machine gun to buy is easy. Their production for civilian use was stopped in 1986, but semi-automatic versions of the same machine guns were still manufactured until 1994, when Bill Clinton signed a 10-year federal ban on certain assault weapons.

The ban didn't amount to much. Civilians were still allowed to possess or transfer millions of assault weapons which were legally manufactured or owned before the law was passed. Also, slightly adapted versions of banned firearms could still be legally manufactured, and millions were. Despite the Columbine High School massacre in 1999, Congress allowed the ban to expire. The anti-gun lobby will argue that the Bush administration has put assault weapons back on the streets. The truth is, they never really left them.

Richard Parker seems unmoved by the debate. "Guns are politically incorrect," he admits. "The people I hang around with in business circles think this is crazy, awful." So why do it? "Because big, powerful guns are a lot of fun to shoot," shrugs Richard.

A sign at Knob Creek's gate declares, "We Support Our President And Our Troops". This is a country at war, as the T-shirts people wear also remind you. One shooter's shirt has a cartoon of an Arab wearing a head bandage and the legend, "I Support Iraqi Prisoner Abuse".

A shooter called Doug Ferguson is selling T-shirts which are "a little" politically incorrect, he admits. "I made them for some friends serving overseas." The front of the T-shirt reads "Baghdad Tobacco Company" and the back - beneath a sketch of a bullet-riddled Iraqi - "Any time's a good time to smoke a raghead. Fire one up today".

Ferguson is a trim, muscular Virginian with ultra-alert eyes - Special Forces, possibly, although he won't reveal his profession. "I do different things," he fudges. "Whatever pays the bills."

"Are you military?" I ask.

"Ex-military," he says.

"Can you be more specific?"

"No."

There is more military paraphernalia for sale at Knob Creek's busy market - and plenty of firearms. A 1918 Maxim gun, made by MAN Nürnberg costs $12,000; a rare Uzi, $99,000. You can also buy a Latvian military-issue nuclear, biological and chemical protection mask; coffee mugs bearing portraits of Hitler, Himmler and Eva Braun; guides to making bombs in your basement and napalm in your bath-tub; and a camouflage bra-and-panties set for the wife.

Another stall sells bumper stickers. "The easiest way to a woman's heart is through the ribcage," says one. "If it weren't for the flashbacks," reads another, "I'd have no memory at all."

"I'm looking for one that says, Register Commies, Not Firearms,'" says Ralph Passonno, an auctioneer from New York state. Passonno grew up with guns. "My daddy gave me my first gun when I was four years old," he recalls proudly. Now the owner of a Colt AR15 semi-automatic, Passonno is a plump, jovial man with a white beard. He's like Santa Claus, but better armed.

"Guns prevent crime," he believes, even though his business partner was shot dead by an armed assailant back in 1981, and Passonno himself badly injured.

Passonno is candid and likable, and worried that his opinions might sound "a bit crazy." In truth, they do, yet they are doubtless shared by many Americans at Knob Creek and beyond. He believes liberalism is a "mental disorder", that tiny computer chips are being inserted into our shoes to track our movements, and that the United Nations and European Union are part of a "One World Government" bent on enslaving Americans and other freedom-loving peoples. He believes the US Patriot Act is an outrage. "You know," he whispers, "that in this country federal agents can now go into our homes without a warrant, take items, and not even tell us they were in there and took them?"

Passonno hates the feds. But he loathes the French. "We've done a lot for them," he says. "They've done nothing for us. They hate us." (A fellow Knob Creeker wears a T-shirt showing a French soldier "saluting" - that is, raising both hands above his head.) But Passonno likes Germans, because he believes they only opposed the Iraq war due to brainwashing by a socialist government and a liberal media. Also, Germans make nice guns. "High-precision, very reliable, top quality," he says. Also, his wife is Bavarian.

At night, like most Knob Creekers, I camp in a nearby field. My neighbour is clad in combat fatigues and called Jim. "An armed America is a polite America," says Jim, who is very polite indeed: he owns a bunch of firearms. "If they ever tried to take 'em away," he vows, almost inaudibly, "there'd be a lot of dead people, and I'd be one of 'em." Jim is the tall, quiet, psychotic type, and when he invites you to share a beer around his campfire, you say yes.

Day two, Saturday, and thousands of people are arriving. They arrive in gas-guzzling SUVs and hell-yeah Humvees bearing American flags and Bush-Cheney stickers; they arrive on Harleys and quads-bikes and great lumbering motorhomes. Absolutely nobody arrives in a Citröen.

The happiest man at Knob Creek is Jeff Gilland. He is the local recruiter for the National Rifle Association (NRA), and this weekend will sign up dozens of new members. "I do well," admits Gilland, 49, a former US Airforce guard who now works at a Jim Beam whiskey factory. "I'm not a high-pressure salesman by any means. I just give them a few facts to think about."

Like the NRA's oft-heard but unproven claim that crime decreases in states where carrying concealed weapons is legal. Or that new gun legislation only serves to distract from the state's miserable record in catching real law-breakers. "Criminals don't obey gun laws," insists Gilland. "If you pass them, you only affect honest people."

Joining the NRA is not just sensible, he continues, but downright patriotic. "The NRA does similar things on the homefront that our military does all around the world: protect freedom," says Gilland. "I hated to see fox-hunting banned in England. That's just as much a tradition for a lot of you folks as the right to carry arms is in this country."

Gilland's arguments are faithfully echoed by other Knob Creekers. "Carrying a camera doesn't necessarily make you a pornographer," Gene Seissiger, an instructor visiting from a Florida shooting school, tells our photographer Philip Blenkinsop. (Nor - as people around here like to say - did a spoon make Rosie O'Donnell fat.) Seissiger's favourite weapon is a Sterling 9mm: British-made, ultra-reliable, deadly accurate over 100 meters.

"It also performs well in deserts," he continues, "which is why a lot of them are now used in Iraq."

"By the Americans?" I ask.

"No," says Seissiger, "by the Iraqis."

Dusk approaches. Thousands of spectators have gathered for the night shoot, Knob Creek's spectacular central event. First, however, the shooters lay down their smoking weapons while a preacher delivers a long, fiery sermon over the public address system.

America's freedoms have been secured by "generations of spilled blood, soaked on battlefields worldwide," the preacher reminds the silent crowd. "You, and you alone, Lord, offer us eternal salvation and freedom through the cost of your spilled blood, soaked on that cross at Calvary." He prays that all George W Bush's decisions are influenced by "God-fearing men," then finally, hoarsely, exhorts everyone to "lock and load for Judgement Day, to be secure about the long time we will all spend on that famous range called ETERNITY." Amen and yee-haa.

The sun sets. I have now worn plastic ear-muffs for two days, and the skin behind my right ear swells and peels: muff-rash.

The night shoot is about to start. Down-range, in the darkness, sit half a dozen 50-gallon drums of fuel strapped with dynamite. When the shooters let rip, the barrels will explode and the night sky will light up with billowing flames and black clouds cross-hatched with multicoloured tracer fire. "Stand at the left-hand side of the range," an old-timer advises me. "That way you get the best concussion."

But Ralph Passonno insists I borrow his shooter's pass and weapon, so I end up on the firing line itself, squeezed between Browning and Thompson machine guns. I'm handed a fully-loaded Colt 223 M16 by Passonno's buddy Pete, a taciturn guy who seems appalled by my lack of firearms experience. As we wait for the order to fire, I say to Pete, "There should be a bumper sticker that says, Never give an Englishman a loaded machine gun.'"

Pete looks at me and laughs without smiling.

www.knobcreekrange.com

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Bruce Thompson, Michigan on 11:31pm Sat 10 Feb 07
You mean to say those gun lovers "arrive in gas-guzzling SUVs", like Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and Nancy Pelosi? The nerve of those common, gun-loving Americans exercising freedom of choice in automobiles.
Actually, it has been proven that crime decreases in states which do not interfere in a citizens right to self defense. Just read Dr. John Lotts research, published in his book "More Guns, Less Crime", which includes statistics from every county in the USA.
Posted by: Henry Bowman, Arizona on 12:36am Mon 12 Feb 07
Actually finding a licensed machine gun to buy is easy. Their
production for civilian use was stopped in 1986, but semi-automatic
versions of the same machine guns were still manufactured until 1994, when Bill Clinton signed a 10-year federal ban on certain assault weapons.


What a bizarre and entirely irrelevant observation.

You might as well write:

"Actually purchasing a gold ingot is easy. Though the original Fort-Knox-style bars now cost over a quarter million dollars each, other versions made of gilded lead, plaster, or hardwood are widely available."

The problem is, a chunk of wood isn't a bar of gold. And a semi-automatic gun isn't a "machine gun."

As we wait for the order to fire, I say to Pete, "There should be a bumper sticker that says, Never give an Englishman a loaded machine gun.'"


Or apparently a pen, to write about them.
Posted by: Longhorn on 1:49pm Mon 12 Feb 07
Bruce Thompson wrote:
You mean to say those gun lovers "arrive in gas-guzzling SUVs", like Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and Nancy Pelosi? The nerve of those common, gun-loving Americans exercising freedom of choice in automobiles.
Actually, it has been proven that crime decreases in states which do not interfere in a citizens right to self defense. Just read Dr. John Lotts research, published in his book "More Guns, Less Crime", which includes statistics from every county in the USA.
Is that the same John Lott who "lost" his research data? And the same John Lott who impersonates a woman so he can write glowing reviews of his own books? The same one who keeps leaving his "research" jobs in disgrace, and now is suing the guys who wrote "Freakonomics" for daring to suggest that there is no data to support his conclusions?
Posted by: Kurt Brant, Texas on 2:51am Tue 13 Feb 07
He arrived at Knob Creek with preconcieved notions, was determined to portray law-abiding firearm owners in a condescending and mocking light, and concluded his mission by selectively describing several 'offensive' T-shirts, obviously done to elicit smug guffaws and knowledgeable head-knods from the more enlightened (and disarmed) society at large.

The depth of the research, the semantics, the selective wording, and above all the inaccuracy, was disappointing, although certainly not unexpected.

Since 1934, there has been one crime committed with a legally registered machine gun in the United States, and that was done by a police officer. Machine gun owners are among the most law-abiding citizens in the United States... your attempt at portraying them as rightist militia nut-jobs is as transparent as it is ineffective.
Posted by: Ralph Passonno, New York State on 4:45am Tue 13 Feb 07
Lots of mis-quotes which is why I don't talk to reporters but, these guys cornered me. Dad gave me my first gun when I was 12 years old not 4. Never said I hated the Feds and didn't tell the reporter from England what guns I owned, if any. I attended the shoot to enjoy the people and the shooting. Didn't bring a gun but, I Auctioned off helicopter rides for the saturday night shoot.

Great experience and education to attend a shoot at Knob Creek. Although the reporter's quotes were not accurate, I hope he got a better understanding of how important the 2nd. Amendment is to Americans.
Posted by: Ralph Passonno on 12:26pm Tue 13 Feb 07
IMPORTANT FACTS LEFT OUT!!
The reporter and I had a long conversation about how the crime rates had risen dramatically in England, Australia and New Zeland following the mandatory surrender of firearms to the Governments. I suggested tto the reporter that he step over to the NRA table and view the video of men from his country (England) crying as they surrendered their family airelooms. Mysteriously, this was left out when he printed the interview.

With respect to the Europe Union and the UN, I only pointed out that the UN wants all citizens, in every country around the world, to be disarmed.

I told the reporter I'd like to own an AR-15 and he shoould try to shoot one while he was at Knob Creek.

Also, I never WHISPERED anything about Homeland Security and warrentless searches. I spoke loud and clear about my understanding of the law.

After getting the reporter on the front line on the opening of the main shoot on Saturday, night (about a 15 year wait for that priviledge) I thought he's be more complimentary about the men and women he met at the event. He came off the line wityh a big smile, found me in the crowd and said "Ralph, I want to thank you, you. You have no idea what you have done for me.

I later emailed him photos of himself on the fireing line. He emailed back a thank yuo and told me that if it weren't for those photos, his friends in England would never have believed him about his experience at Knob Creek. HOPE HIS NEXT ARTICLE IS A BIT MORE ACCURATE MATES.

Ralph Passonno
Posted by: paul, USA on 1:28pm Tue 13 Feb 07
What the reporter does not understand is we as americans have a gun culture and the RIGHT to have such granted in the constitution. His views are skewed by the perceptions his gov't has given his country for a long time. You also don't see that for the most part those same SUV's and men and women at that event are generally first responders to events and situations where others are paralized in fear. Like anything else in life we all tend to be afraid of what we don't understand. I believe this reporter shows that with his bias.
Posted by: billy, NY IN THE GREAT U.S.A on 4:02am Wed 14 Feb 07
This is just a nother crackpot reporter changing what people say that is why i would not talk to him yet his list of lies took 4 months to make up its people like him that force us to have to fight for our right to bare arms
Posted by: Lee McGee, Jeanerette, LA on 12:38pm Fri 16 Feb 07
"Foolish liberals who want to read the 2nd Amendment out of the Consttution by claiming it's not an individual right or that it's too much of a public safety hazard don't see the danger in the big picture. They're courting disaster by encouraging others to use the same means to eliminate portions of the Constitution they don't like." -- Alan Dershowitz (Certainly no right-wing gun wacko)
Posted by: Rick, Jacksonville, Florida on 7:02pm Fri 16 Feb 07
The author, with his little comments, sounds a bit anti-gun to me.
Posted by: Guy, Woodford County, Kentucky on 10:41pm Fri 16 Feb 07
Yee Haw! Next time better send 'im to cover the cricket matches, huh?
Posted by: Story, USA on 1:01am Fri 23 Feb 07
How's the crime-free, gun-free culture working out in good old England?
Posted by: John, USA on 10:19pm Sat 3 Mar 07
Man, what a slanted and mean-spirited article. So Americans are all a bunch of blood-thirsty, war-mongering bumkins running around in dirty T-shirts? And what a bunch of erroneous "facts," with respect to U.S. firearms laws and the capabilities of the guns. A fifty caliber rifle taking out a tank? And hitting a "skull-sized target" at 2000 yards -- except out of blind luck -- what a joke.
Posted by: Jurgen Stemmler on 6:31pm Sun 4 Mar 07


The next time you disarmed rooineks have a problem with the Germans, count us out.

We won't give or lend you any of our evil guns. And in short order you will start celebrating Oktoberfest.

Posted by: Rick Randall, Washington, DC USA on 6:19pm Thu 8 Mar 07
Longhorn wrote:
Bruce Thompson wrote: You mean to say those gun lovers \"arrive in gas-guzzling SUVs\", like Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and Nancy Pelosi? The nerve of those common, gun-loving Americans exercising freedom of choice in automobiles. Actually, it has been proven that crime decreases in states which do not interfere in a citizens right to self defense. Just read Dr. John Lotts research, published in his book \"More Guns, Less Crime\", which includes statistics from every county in the USA.
Is that the same John Lott who \"lost\" his research data? And the same John Lott who impersonates a woman so he can write glowing reviews of his own books? The same one who keeps leaving his \"research\" jobs in disgrace, and now is suing the guys who wrote \"Freakonomics\" for daring to suggest that there is no data to support his conclusions?
Dr. Lott lost data from ONE telephone survey. Considering he has conducted hundreds of surveys (using different methods), losing one merely invalidates (doesn't "discredit" it -- it merely removes the basis for any conclusion RELIANT on that single survey). And it certainly doesn't discredit the work ("More Guns, Less Crimes") you are thinking of -- considering that study was NOT based (in whole, or even in part) on any telephone survey, but rather was based on government collated crime statistics, on a county by county basis.

Dr. Lott (who BEGAN the study as an anti-gunner convinced ready access to guns caused crimes) then removed the various factors that could account for differences in crime rates -- urbanization, economic health, individual jobless rates, individual economic health, school performance, race, etc.

The conclusion was quite startling to him -- once you eliminate ALL factors except ease of "right to carry", the crime rates are lower in teh areas that have looser gun restrictions, and teh NATURE of the crimes are less violent -- more non-confrontational burgleries than violent robberies. (I don't know about you, but I'd rather some guy stole my car stereo when I wasn;t around than stuck a gun in my face and took my wallet. Insurance can replace my stereo, but not my face. . . )

The "Freakanomics" guys made public statements claiming that their analysis of the data flatly disproved Dr. Lott's conclusions, and in fact Dr. Lott made up his answers because they couldn't replicate his findings. Problem. . . They didn't look at the same data and analayze it in the same fashion.

That makes their statements "defamatory" -- the basis of the lawsuit.

Now the "Freakanomics" authors, on the other hand, came to the conclusion that legal abortion reduced crime rates -- by aborting those who would have grown up to be criminals (read as minorities). But then, "Freakanomics" is a "pop" piece that has been REPEATEDLY ripped apart for it's misuse of statistics and use of the wrong statistical tools (for example, using total numbers of crimes to compare crime "rates" in different areas and periods -- rather than the VALID method to calculate rates which would be look at numbers of crimes per capita), while "More Guns, Less Crimes" is a peer-reviewed work that HAS been academically validated by other researchers who come to teh table with either no gun bias (and no interest either way) or an anti-gun bias.

Michael Bellesiles is the researcher who lost his job, other positions, and had his awards revoked for faulty research about guns. You see, Bellesiles is the guy who claimed that almost no body in America owned guns until the 1860's. He "concluded" from this "research" that, therefor, gun bans would be constitutional, since if no one in America really owned guns in the 1780's, the writers of teh Bill of rights couldn't have meant the 2nd Amendment to apply to private citizens. He was found to have invented his "facts" (including making up statistics for records that were destroyed in their entirty in 1906 with no back ups), he "lost" all of his research notes and original source notes (when asked for sources), and outright contradicted his original sources (when he cliamed sources that actually existed) -- even in quotations! (Claiming, for example, that a probate listing from 1780 listed NO firearms, when in fact it listed over a dozen -- this error repeated with almost EVERY quotation he made.)

But, hey, why let actual facts get in the way of your politically motivated fantasies?
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login