Home
October 12, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Fighting rough

Donald Trump's bid to build a massive golf resort on the Aberdeenshire coast has turned into an epic drama. From New York to Balmedie, we meet the cast of a real-life Local Hero
Part one: Trump talks, by Andrew Purcell in New York

TRUMP TOWER is a cliff of glass and steel, 58 floors high, on the most expensive stretch of Fifth Avenue, New York. It is open to the public to show us the money: "Gucci, coming soon!" When Donald Trump sweeps in, flanked by two impeccably suited heavies, it causes a stir. "Look at all these people taking your picture," he tells his companion, with a winning charm that would sound rehearsed coming from anyone but the most famous businessman in America. Trump is his own best customer, a brilliant method actor, so immersed in his role that man and myth are inseparable.

The security men wave me into a different elevator. Trump will see me when he is good and ready, once I have had a moment to look at Central Park through the glass wall of his office, time to flick through the high-roller publications carrying his profile, the programme for his Miss Universe contest and Trump Magazine itself. The big story inside is the launch of Trump Vodka, an ostentatious gold bottle full of "success distilled".

Trump's image is everywhere, floor to ceiling, in frames too many to count. They cover every inch of wall space, in the waiting room, along the corridors, surrounding his secretary in her alcove. He is on the cover of Esquire, Vanity Fair and GQ, here grinning as he cuts the red ribbon on a new building, there picking up an award or shaking hands with a celebrity. His hair never changes. There is a box of books on the floor, waiting to be signed - Think Big And Kick Ass In Business And Life.

After about a quarter of an hour, I am summoned into his personal space. There are signed basketballs, American football helmets, a shelf littered with trophies and yet more photos of the man sitting behind the desk. His handshake is firm, his gaze direct: "Tell me about this newspaper. How big is it?"

Before I can even sit down, he hands me a sheaf of glossy paper and cardboard: a New York Times printout, a rich list and a portfolio of properties from "the biggest name in real estate by far!" The architecture column approving of Trump World Tower (not to be confused with Trump Tower, Trump Palace, Trump Plaza, the Trump Building or Trump Place) was written in 2002. The ranking sheet of New York's privately owned companies that shows him ahead of Bloomberg, Hearst Corp and Warner Music Group was drawn up in 2004.

"I'll give you a little information so it's easy for you," he says. "This is a recent review of one of my buildings, this shows that we're the number one private company in New York." He has several copies of each and I get the impression that he hands them to his guests as a matter of course.

For the first minute, Trump asks all the questions: "This is not about the guy with the land, I guess, is it? Is that a big story? Not particularly, right? You know he's not in our way; do people understand that?" And like that, we're off, into the Michael Forbes as Local Hero story that fairly or unfairly casts Trump as Burt Lancaster playing Felix Happer, the unscrupulous American businessman trying to buy a chunk of Scotland.

For the fictional fishing village of Ferness, read Menie Links. For oil, read golf. Trump plans to build a resort by the North Sea, but as he only trades in superlatives it will be "the greatest golf course in the world. We have more frontage on the ocean, better links, bigger dunes."

He says: "Somehow there's the misconception that I need that land - absolutely false. But what we would like Forbes to do is clean up his land. He should be ashamed of himself, it's a terrible representation of Scotland. My mother was from Scotland and she would not be terribly happy to see what he's doing with that land.

"It's in total disrepair. It's not taken care of. It's got rusting oil cans, tractors that haven't been used in years. It has nothing to do with our golf course, other than that it looks bad for the country of Scotland. If I had a choice between buying his land and him fixing it up, I would rather have him fix it up." He repeats this last sentence four times. Having failed to buy Michael Forbes, so far, he is trying his hardest to ignore him.

The two golf courses, the hotel and the holiday homes that Trump hopes to build are presented as a personal project, the closing of a circle that opened in the 1930s when his mother left the village of Tong, on the Isle of Lewis, and boarded a ship to New York. "Because of the relationship of this project to my mother, this is my most important job," Trump says. "From the standpoint of legacy I would rate this at the top.

"I make money doing a lot of different things. I don't need this project. If my mother wasn't born in Scotland, I wouldn't do it. It is an amazing story if you think about it. My mother came from Stornoway and here I am the biggest developer in New York, one of the biggest in the world. That tells you about the Scottish people."

Trump has the practised ease of a politician, forever ready with a soothing remark, generous with his blandishments. He talks airily of having "a great feeling for Scotland", praises Scots for their drive and namedrops Sean Connery, "the first official member of my club".

He calls Alex Salmond "a brilliant man", but won't reveal whether the first minister supports the development, perhaps mindful of the trouble that Salmond's predecessor Jack McConnell stepped into when he offered his enthusiastic backing last year.

TRUMP has never worn the McLeod tartan, his birthright, but claims to own "a lot of McLeod things", with a vague wave of his hand. It is evidently his sister, a senior US judge, who keeps the family connection alive by visiting Lewis every year. Trump has promised to stop in his ancestral home soon, but can't say if he will invest there too.

The phone rings. Would I mind if he takes it? His daughter in California is worried about forest fires. "Well how far away is the smoke? I'll buy you another house if it burns down, honey, OK?"

Trump hasn't seen Local Hero, but he knows enough to reject the comparison. "From what I understand, it wouldn't apply to me," he says, "because everybody in Aberdeen, 10 to one, is in favour of this job. This is a very popular job, and that's the difference between this and the film, as I understand it. People would be extremely disappointed if it didn't get approved."

This is Trump world, a relentlessly positive place where no weakness is acknowledged, no opposition allowed for. To hear him talk about the development, one would think that his bulldozers will be greeted with garlands of heather.

He says: "I'm going to spend $1.5 billion building something that will be the talk of the world. Everybody wants this to happen. It will be great for the economy, will be great for tourism, will create a lot of jobs. It's 134 letters against, over 2000 letters in favour. They want it very badly in Aberdeen."

He has hired Martin Hawtree to design the course, as much for his connections within the Royal & Ancient as for his design pedigree, which includes notable alterations to the links at Carnoustie and Royal Birkdale.

Trump is a good golfer himself, with a four handicap he is struggling to maintain as he gets older. So, Michael Forbes refusing to sell is like an unlucky kick into the gorse bushes, I suggest. "No, this is very easy," he replies. "It's not much of a problem."

What about the locals taking to the dunes with signs that say: "Dump Trump"? Might we compare them to a tricky pot bunker that he has strayed into with his approach shot? He shrugs off the analogy: "It's literally a few people, but they get all the press."

At this point the conversation is interrupted by the arrival of a party of Trump's friends. "This is Phil Rosen, the biggest lawyer in New York," he tells me. Rosen is here to shoot a short video for his son's Bar Mitzvah. The script is a pastiche of Trump's hit television show, The Apprentice. It ends on an uncharacteristically upbeat note: "Isaac, you're hired."

Once he has mugged his way through the scene, coaxing his adolescent co-star along like a true pro, Trump offers to show us the set. The Apprentice is in its seventh season, now with celebrities competing for his approval, a twist that undermines the programme's aspirational appeal. The mocked-up conference chamber and meeting rooms occupy a whole floor of Trump Tower, complete with ceiling-mounted cameras, two-way mirrors and microphones in the walls.

Trump's daughter Ivanka, herself a star of the show, joins us on the set. Trump introduces me: "This is Andrew, he's going to write a bad story on me. I can tell it's going to be bad because of his questions so far. But you know, I'll get over it, I'll keep going. Who else has had more bad stories written about them than me?"

The marriage of menace and charm plays into his capitalist anti-hero image. His catchphrase is: "You're fired!" He tells me proudly that it came third in a poll of the best-known lines on US television. I ask him what the first two were. "The top was, Here's Johnny' - you know, Johnny Carson," he says, "and that moon thing, which I don't understand why it's in there. One giant leap for mankind.' That's not a catchphrase, he only said it once."

Trump is accustomed to getting his way, and the occasions when he was thwarted have been expunged from his personal history so thoroughly that, to him at least, it is as if they never happened. He famously flirted with bankruptcy in the early 1990s, but managed to reduce and restructure his billion-dollar debts, before embarking on a fresh wave of accumulation and publishing another instalment of his best-selling business books: The Art Of The Comeback.

How much Trump is worth is a matter of considerable debate. He is, by any standard, a phenomenally wealthy man. But he does not actually own many of the buildings that bear his name. Rather, he acts as a consultant and front man, lending his brand to investments made my other developers. Last year he sued unofficial biographer Timothy O'Brien for calculating his net worth at around $200 million, describing his book, TrumpNation, as "badly written irresponsible, malicious and false reporting".

Forbes Magazine estimates that he is the world's 314th richest person, with assets of $2.9 billion - poorer than Richard Branson, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg but richer than David Rockefeller Sr, Gordon Getty and David Sainsbury. "I build great projects," Trump says. "And the community embraces us because they know that if Trump comes in it will be the highest quality development. You'll see that in Scotland. Ultimately it's all my money. I may finance it, but it's my money.

"I've faced opposition like this many times, and in all cases I've succeeded. Trump World Tower is the tallest residential building in the world. Everybody opposed me, I ended up winning. It's now one of the most popular buildings in New York and is receiving phenomenal reviews architecturally."

He views the environmental objections of Scottish Heritage and the RSPB as a hurdle to be cleared, no more, and insists that the Balmedie development will both stabilise the dunes and bring an end to hunting on the land, joking that "all we're going to be shooting is birdies and eagles".

"It's an extremely expensive project to build, and our environmental concerns have made it more expensive," he adds. "What we're going to do is to make it better environmentally than it is now. We're very sensitive to it. It's much more expensive to do that and not rip everything apart, but we feel like we have to do it."

He reaches for a copy of his book and writes on the flyleaf: "To Andrew. Treat me fairly!" My time is up. On the way out, past the endless portraits of success personified, I search for a declaration befitting this modern king of kings, in all his hubristic glory: "Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!" But the Trump Organisation has no Shelley on its staff. There is only a small wooden plaque with a simple message. It reads "Donald Trump: You're Fired!'"

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Rohan Beyts, Aberdeenshire on 8:37am Sun 28 Oct 07
I am very disheartened by this piece. It clearly shows that Trump has no idea of what looking after the environent is. This land is a natural dune system(apart from the estate land that is adjacent)that has formed due to natural processes, not through human interference. It is part of a diminishing system of rare, mobile dunes and he will destroy that and replace it with manicured greens and artificial water features. I,like Trump had a Scottish mother whose legacy to me was valuing our beautiful landscape and wild areas. I am not sure how many Aberdeen folk realise just what a blot this development will be with the name Trump emblazonned all over it.
Finally if, as he claims ,it is a personal thing why does he need to build the huge hotel (bigger than Marischal College) and the 1500 houses.
Posted by: Deirdre Morris, Arizona, U.S.A. on 9:15pm Sun 28 Oct 07
This is horrifying, and I hope enough people will stand up, be heard, and be counted in the efforts to nix Trump's proposed development. If not, your wildflowers, wildlife, sand dunes, and seal colonies will disappear forever. Not to mention the disastrous effects the increased traffic and population will haveon the area.
Posted by: Overton, Menie on 6:50am Mon 29 Oct 07
It would be helpful if your reporter canvassed the views of the vast majority of people in the Balmedie / Aberdeen area who are actually strongly in favour of Mr Trump's plans.
Mr Trump is offering a very special opportunity to the North East of Scotland and that area should grasp the offer with both hands. Many jobs will be created and with the new Aberdeen Peripheral Route just about to be started, good access to the new resort from all over the UK will soon be available.
With a new Golf facility at Menie Aberdeen Airport will surely be upgraded.
Menie was formerly a shooting estate and the new development can only benefit local wildlife.
The salmon station at Menie should be closed thus assisting the recovery of the Atlantic Salmon which has suffered severely from over fishing for the past 40 years or so.

Posted by: Alastair, Aberdeen on 12:32pm Mon 29 Oct 07
This will be an absolute disaster. A garish faux-Victorian style hotel and 1500 villas and holiday homes? You can hardly think of where to begin.

Firstly, the complex will be a totally out of character with the surrounding area. Holiday homes lying empty for most of the year has ruined many a coast-line, including Connemara in the West of Ireland. But the shear vastness of this is what is so awful.

Secondly, access to a popular beach will be a thing of the past, and all for the gratification of a few megarich celebs.

Thirdly, there are the environmental consequences, so ably highlighted by the RSPB. How many rare species of wild-life will you have to kill off before you discover that once they're gone, they're gone for good. Irreversible damage done. When will it stop?

Next there is the issue of the impact on the local housing markets. As stated above, most of these will lie empty for most of the year, so you can be sure that these are not for the benefit of the Scottish people, but of a very select few, in some cases a very, very carefully selected few. What is unavoidable however is the impact this will have on local house-prices in nearby Ellon, where house-prices will go through the roof, making even more difficult for first-time buyers to get a foot on the property ladder.

Then there is the issue of the so-called jobs benefits. I am prepared to believe that in a place of this size there might be a few hotel manager positions available, but that will be it. Apart from that most of it will be toilet cleaners, car-park attendants, golf-caddies, "bell-hops", or possibly gun-toting security guards in the gated security compound. Sustainable bread-winning jobs they will not be.

Then there is the issue of the transport infrastructure. Last year, all Aberdeen City Councillors were seen glad-handing with Donald Trump, accepting his hospitality at the Beach Ballroom. At this time, he made it clear that he regarded the Western Peripheral Route as an "essential". This was on the same visit where he had McConnell eating out of his hand. So there you have it. Aberdeen and North East transport policy dictated from Trump Tower. And this is at a time when a public enquiry is about to open into the road, and a well-organised objection is to seek a judicial review. To his credit Alex Salmond has agreed to stand by the results of that review, but the point is that all due process went out the window when Trump was here last year.

You could go on and on, but the point is, you have to ask why Donald Trump is being portrayed as some latter-day Fairy Godmother. He is not used to having ANYONE stand in his way, and those so keen to welcome him with open arms now should remember that - this man does what HE wants without ANY regard for anyone else. Bear this in mind in the future. I personally would never do business with anyone like that. Ever.
Posted by: overton, menie on 1:15pm Mon 29 Oct 07
The AWPR, like Mr Trump's proposal is welcomed by the majority of people in the area. The only people against the new bypass are a clique of mega rich objectors on Deeside. Most workers who have to endure traffic gridlock in Aberdeen look forward to sensible easing of the current traffic problems.
Mr Trump's plan will benefit local businesses and local people alike.
Access to the beach has never been through the former shooting estate at Menie but via Balmedie and the beach will still remain accessible through Balmedie to Newburgh in the North and the River Don in the South.
Environmentally the Menie development can benefit wildlife as from now on there will be no shooting on the estate.
Posted by: Alastair, Aberdeen on 2:57pm Mon 29 Oct 07
overton wrote:
The AWPR, like Mr Trump's proposal is welcomed by the majority of people in the area. The only people against the new bypass are a clique of mega rich objectors on Deeside. Most workers who have to endure traffic gridlock in Aberdeen look forward to sensible easing of the current traffic problems. Mr Trump's plan will benefit local businesses and local people alike. Access to the beach has never been through the former shooting estate at Menie but via Balmedie and the beach will still remain accessible through Balmedie to Newburgh in the North and the River Don in the South. Environmentally the Menie development can benefit wildlife as from now on there will be no shooting on the estate.
There will be NO benefitting of traffic congestion in the centre of Aberdeen, and it is not just mega-rich people who are objecting to it. Has Donald Trump deposited some millions in an off-shore bank account that I don't know about? Because I have objected to the road, and I and many others like me wouldn't clasee themselves as mega-rich. Anyway, this is off-topic but I could produce endless arguments that would shoot the case for the AWPR down in flames. Apart from merely repeating the assertion that Mr Trump's plans will benefit local businesses in the way you think, you haven't put a case for it. You haven't addressed my point about house prices for example - a perfectly valid point - or about the issue of holiday homes lying empty for most of the year, a major problem in Connemara in the West of Ireland.

Fair point re the access to the beach.

The argument about no more shooting on the estate is clutching at straws. Controlled shooting can keep the environment in balance. Destroying habitats forever means that species is gone, never to be brought back.

Once again, bear in mind the type of person you are dealing with in Donald Trump. This is a fairy god-mother who says you shall go to the ball and just to make sure, you'll have a pistol at your head to make sure you **** WELL have a good time OR ELSE!
Posted by: overton, menie on 3:25pm Mon 29 Oct 07
Alastair, Please be kind enough to regulate your comments and try to maintain a factual non-emotional discussion here.
Mr Trump's development will be a benefit to the area, complete with housing, as can be witnessed from a similar development in the Scottish Borders at Cardrona. That development has increased business and employment in that locality and surely that is what is sought at Balmedie. Increasing the housing stock is a Goverment Policy and the assumption that the new village to be created at Menie is purely for holiday homes is, I am sure, quite wrong.
I am not sure precisely what wildlife species are allegedly at risk due to the development but would of course be interested to know.
Thw AWPR can only ease Aberdeen city centre congestion as when implemented that route will allow clear passage from North to South and visa versa without the now virtually unavoidable transit through the town which can add over one and a half hours to a journey depending on the time of day.
Mr Trump seems to have presented his proposal quite reasonably and it seems that most people who are against the development have an attitude against him rather than the development - would it be different if a local entreprenuer had offered to fund such an ambitious scheme?
Posted by: Alastair, Aberdeen on 4:24pm Mon 29 Oct 07
Overton, as you wish. As they say, let's have the facts, just the facts. These are as follows:

Mr Trump's resort will be made up of holiday homes. Trump has said as much himself. Some will even be villas. I suspect these will lie empty for most of the year. This has become a big problem elsewhere. These houses, I think you will find, are not meant to part of any government housing policy. They are there purely for those who can afford to pay premium prices.

If you want to know about the effects on wildlife, the RSPB would be a good port of call. Not being an ornithologist myself I can't go into details, but the RSPB has listed at least 2 rare species that would be threatened with extinction. Their website would be a good place to start. Alternatively the chap in the Aberdeen office would be able to tell you. His name is David Parnaby. Don't have the number, to hand but can get it fairly quickly.

The AWPR will NOT relieve traffic congestion. My tongue in cheek quip about Donald Trump having deposited millions in some secret bank account was merely a riposte to your suggestion that those who objected were merely the mega rich in Deeside. This is not the case. When this road was first proposed the Oscar Faber report of 1996/7 into the effectiveness of the road suggested that it produce AT BEST a 4% reduction on traffic congestion in Aberdeen city centre, and this DID NOT take into account the phenomenon of "induced traffic" namely the increased traffic that uses a road just because it has been upgraded. This is a well known phenomenon and accounts for an increase of approximately 15% in traffic usage, which road traffic designers take into account when assessing the benefits or otherwise of a road-building scheme. This report was quietly binned however. I would like to know why. The same report also came to the conclusion that Aberdeen was an end destination, i.e. that traffic either started or finished its journey in Aberdeen. This being the case, how can a by-pass be relevant? The answer is surely to re-assess the movement of traffic in the city centre and direct it where it should be going within Aberdeen, but a by-pass is, I'm afraid, irrelevant.

My objection to Mr Trump's intervention in all this is that all due process went out the window. Aberdeen City councillors accepting hospitality when discussing the by-pass was totally inappropriate. Ditto Jack McConnell re. the development and the By-pass.

I do not trust Donald Trump at all. Not in the least. However, if Stewart Milne were to propose the same scheme I would be equally against it. I think he is another businessman who has the Council totally in his pocket, but, in the spirit of sticking to the facts, I can't prove it.

I am surprised the SH deleted the word in the last line. To me it was relatively harmless. It was merely a D, followed by an A followed by an M, followed by an N, put them all together and you get..........

There, pure facts, no emotional hype, or anything.
Posted by: overton, menie on 5:22pm Mon 29 Oct 07
Alastair,
In response to your last post I would comment as follows against each para:

1. Suspicions and assumptions do not constitute fact but I would say that even as holiday homes the creation of such a facility in Menie can only benefit the economy of the North East of Scotland. The hotel alone would be a great addition to the tourist and business trade near to Aberdeen.
2. I hoped for more facts pertaining to the wildlife issue but I am sure that there will still be plenty of room here for the Greylag Geese or Fieldfares that frequent the area during the winter months.
3. Discussions pertaining to a Report which was produced over 10 years ago does not bear any factual relevance to the traffic situation facing Aberdeen now. Efficient access to the south via the new AWPR from townships North of Aberdeen is unquestionably a good thing for the whole area and will vastly reduce traffic through the city.
4. Unsure what you mean here.
5. No comment
6. Not needed.
7. You are still not producing facts only assumptions perhaps laced with some predjudice?
Posted by: Alastair, Aberdeen on 5:56pm Mon 29 Oct 07
Overton,
Got things to do just now, will try to respond later. May even be tomorrow (people coming in this evening), just to let you know I haven't gone all silent on the matter.

Alastair
Posted by: overton, menie on 6:27am Tue 30 Oct 07
Alastair,
I think your disappearance is because you have become completely swamped and overwhelmed by a massive lack of facts!
Posted by: Alastair, Aberdeen on 10:15am Tue 30 Oct 07
overton wrote:
Alastair, I think your disappearance is because you have become completely swamped and overwhelmed by a massive lack of facts!
Just hardly! Do you think I haven't got a life other than to sit and answer your questions? I gave you an honest reason why I couldn't continue the thread last night, namely I had people in, although quite frankly it is none of your business. In about 20 minutes at the end of the night after people left, I came up with quotes and figures from source documents that can blow most of your arguments away. If you're interested in an honest discussion, which I suspect you're not, then I can furnish you with this. If not, then all I can say is, I shall continue to support those who campaign against it, but if it does go ahead and you take this guy's money, I hope against hope that I don't have to come back and say "I told you so!"
Posted by: overton, menie on 10:22am Tue 30 Oct 07
Alastair, You're letting your emotions take over again - calm down and take three deep breaths. A wee bit of humour is always good after some heavy discussion.
You don't seem to have blown any arguments away yet but perhaps you'll be able to produce more hot air after those three deep breaths? All the best.
Posted by: Alastair, Aberdeen on 11:03am Tue 30 Oct 07
Overton, I've got a great sense of humor, believe me. In fact I almost fall about laughing at your posts, so keep them coming. Meanwhile, you said you were interested to know about the threats to wildlife, so if you click on this link you'll see what the RSPB has to say on the Trump plan.

http://thescotsman.s

cotsman.com/index.cf

m?id=735312007

I could go on and say what other nature charities have to say about it as well, but seeing as the discussion started on the RSPB, we'll stick with them for the time being.


As for the By-Pass, I'm amazed by your take on this. A report was commissioned, the report came to the conclusions that I stated above. Now, if I were a planner, I would have abandoned it there and then, the proposed solution clearly not being "fit for purpose" so to speak. No amount of post facto justification can alter the fact that it was just plain daft in the first place, or were there other interests in play? Curious that the status of Green Belt was abolished at the same time, which conveniently means that development can take place all along the route. Mere speculation? Perhaps! Putting 2 facts together and coming to a conclusion is more like it. Anyway, if you want to read the "By-Passing the Truth" report by Friends of the Earth, it is crammed full of statistics from source documents and government departments. In other words, based on fact, not mere speculation. Experience in other By-Pass experiments is also examined.


Run along now and check this out. Anyway, must go, I've got things to do, probably won't be back in touch. I've come up with facts, and figures quoted from source documents you haven't. Bye bye!
Posted by: overton, menie on 12:12pm Tue 30 Oct 07
Alastair - I know you have to come back!
As Jock McSprog says 'how many jobs do the pompous bufoons in the RSPB intend to create in the area'?
Posted by: swart, Dubai, UAE on 9:59am Thu 22 Nov 07
Mr. Trump,
Save the day and donate the land bordering Mr. Forbes's property to Nature convservation.
Imagine the "Trump nature conservancy" or "The Forbes Salmon Foundation" your Mom would be so proud.
You could get a little place further down the road to build on instead and everyone will eat those comments made about you.
This may be just the thing to encourage Mr. Forbes to move those frustrating oil drums that trouble your dreams.
Go on, show us your bigger than your wallet.
PS You should ask Mr. Forbes who does his hair?

To the community of Balmedie and Aberdeen, do you realise what is coming if you allow this project to proceed.
Look at the history and style of Trump business and you will realise that once you no longer have control of your little paradise, you may hear he's motto "Your Fired"
Posted by: Holger, Berlin on 10:31am Tue 8 Jan 08
Yo Andrew,
did miss you but found you had moved to NYC and just today I heard your
voice on the Beeb about the Audiospotlights!
Well done,
how are you keeping over there?
I hope you are well and keep up the good work!

drop me a line if you wish,
your beeb address does not work anymore
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login