Me and my big mouth Aamer Anwar has spent his life causing trouble where he thinks wrongs need to be righted. now his career is on the line. Paul Dalgarno has been by the lawyer’s side as he counts down to contempt proceedings SCOTLAND'S MOST prominent human rights lawyer is facing ruin. At the high court in Edinburgh this week, three senior appeal judges will decide whether to find Aamer Anwar guilty of contempt of court. If they do, it could mean a fine, imprisonment or a referral to the Law Society of Scotland, which could effectively ban him from practising law. For Anwar, who has built a career on defending the underdog, the stakes could not be higher.
The contempt hearing - instigated by Lord Carloway, the judge at the trial last year of Glasgow student Mohammed Atif Siddique - is the first of its kind in the UK and as such will make legal history. Anwar lodged an appeal two weeks ago on behalf of Siddique, who was convicted on charges pertaining to the collection and dissemination of terrorist literature via websites that he ran. In September, Anwar described the verdict as "a tragedy for justice and for freedom of speech" and claimed his client had been "found guilty of what millions of young people do every day, looking for answers on the internet". Contentiously, he also alleged that Siddique's prosecution was "driven by the state" in an "atmosphere of hostility" following the Glasgow airport attack. In his notes, Lord Carloway countered that Anwar's remarks "appeared to be an unjustified attack on almost every area of the trial process, other than the defence" and that, rather than speaking for his client, his statements reflected his own "personal views" and "lacked any hint of objectivity".
It is not the first time Anwar has been in the firing line for something he has said but, in terms of consequence, it could be the worst. The wider issues thrown up by his case concern the right of solicitors to speak publicly after a trial, whether personally or on behalf of their clients, and the degree to which this should be allowed. Since November, the pressure has been building. Day by day. Week by week. As an outspoken campaigner, known for his vitriolic speeches, keeping silent has been the hardest part for Aamer Anwar. The countdown to the fight of his life starts here.
10 WEEKS TO GO
FEBRUARY 22. GLASGOW UNIVERSITY HUSTINGS
Anwar - who is standing for rectorship of Glasgow University - shares a stage with his rivals, the former Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy and Green MSP Patrick Harvie. In private, just 10 minutes ago, he admitted that he couldn't face thinking about the ramifications should his contempt hearing go against him. Instead, his attention is trained on his belief that student representatives have already anointed Kennedy as their rector, denying the other candidates the right to hang posters in the hall. When he stands, he is less man than man-sized mosquito, half-starved and seeking blood. Kennedy in particular looks incredulous when Anwar describes the election process as "an indictment of democracy" in which the non-Kennedy camps are at a disadvantage. "I don't claim I can represent you from Westminster or even Fort William," he says. "But you have the right to an active campaigning rector, not some nostalgic ego trip." Kennedy's supporters gasp; a number of students applaud; some simply laugh. It's easy to see why people feel uneasy around Anwar: if this were a beach, he would be the scorpion waiting patiently in your shoe.
His accent is part Manchester, where he was born, part Liverpool, where he grew up, and part Glasgow, where he became an adult. Undulating sentences shoot out, lassoing everything from university job losses to the occupation of Iraq, from stealth and suicide bombers to the ills of student debt. His main thrust is that he will be a campaigning rector at Glasgow, just as he was a campaigning student there. In 1989, he fronted a campaign that would lead to the introduction of anonymous marking for dental students, successfully arguing that racial discrimination had until then played a part in exam results. He recounts the story - not for the first time - of how, in 1991, he was accosted by police while flyposting information in Glasgow's west end about a forthcoming student demonstration. "My face got slammed against the pavement until my teeth started to crumble," he says. "My head was pulled back again and I fell unconscious. I was dragged along the cobblestones by a policeman and a policewoman and when I came round my face was covered in blood, I couldn't feel my mouth. While I was screaming for help I was told that this was what happens to black boys with big mouths." In 1995, he successfully sued Strathclyde Police, winning £4200 following Scotland's first civil action alleging a racist attack by police. "I don't give a damn about my career," he snarls at one point during his speech. He should be elected rector, he says, for his record of "standing up for other people's rights without worrying about my own career". Kennedy will subsequently be elected and Anwar is secretly very worried about his career. He sits to applause, takes notes.
SEVEN WEEKS TO GO
MARCH 15. STOP THE WAR DEMO. GLASGOW GREEN
Wind whips words from an inadequate PA system amid pro-Palestine flags, communist sickles, and copies of the Socialist Worker. Anwar is on a roster of speakers that includes deputy first minister Nicola Sturgeon and the novelist AL Kennedy. His seven-week-old son Qais waits beside the stage; a placard in his buggy reads "Troops Out Of Iraq". It might as well read My First Rally, which this is, to the chagrin of Anwar's parents, who fear the event could descend into a riot. But Anwar is proud. Later he will talk at length about how Qais has given him "something that's mine, that's not polluted, where there are not any struggles or oppression". Still, the man who takes the microphone five years after the invasion of Iraq is spitting feathers. "I'm tired of our government's stance on civil liberties and how the Muslim community has to integrate into an authoritarian Britain," he says. "I will not swear allegiance to the Queen. Injustice will radicalise and recruit, just as it did with the IRA." His statement last September, following the conviction of Siddique, struck a similar note: "Young Muslims today live in a climate of fear no different to that experienced by the Irish community in the last century." While speaking, he looks down regularly at his son, his anger dampened briefly, then reignited.
SIX WEEKS TO GO
MARCH 20. AAMER ANWAR & CO. CARLTON PLACE. GLASGOW
Anwar sits in his legal office, surrounded by photographs and framed newspaper articles. One picture shows him in Glasgow's Western Infirmary shortly after his teeth were bashed in by the police, a disturbing expression on his blood-soaked face as if he is smiling. Another shows him with Thomas "TC" Campbell, whose murder conviction he saw quashed in 2004; in another, he is spitting on a car - presumably that of a scab - during the 1993 Timex factory strike in Dundee. Tommy Sheridan - who Anwar is representing in his current perjury case - is in the same picture. In yet another, he is standing with the parents of Surjit Singh Chhokar, a Sikh waiter murdered in 1998. Anwar - at that time studying law as a mature student - became the family's full-time campaigner and legal spokesperson after three men were acquitted of the murder.
His campaign for the family prompted two criminal inquiries and led to the 2001 Jandoo Report, which found there was "institutional racism" in the Scottish criminal justice system. The report also lambasted Anwar for misinterpreting the Chhokar family and for attempting "to interfere with the prosecution to the point where his actions jeopardised the case".
Anwar made his name with the Chhokar campaign, but was painted in some quarters as a maverick and mischief maker, a caricature that still holds sway among some. He said at the time that the legal establishment wanted to destroy him, that there were people bent on ending his career. For Anwar, the parallels with his current situation are obvious. "I remember saying during the Chhokar trial that I expected to have to look over my shoulder for the rest of my life," he says. "I'm well aware of the fact that anything I do will be scrutinised and checked 10 times over in comparison to anyone else, which means I've to work 10 times as hard as anyone else just to survive."
Prominent English human rights lawyers such as Gareth Peirce, Imran Khan and Michael Mansfield have publicly criticised the Scottish justice system for its handling of Anwar's contempt case, given that his comments were made after the verdict in the Siddique trial, and all three have been assisting in the preparation for his contempt hearing. His Scottish legal team comprises three lawyers and is headed by Paul McBride QC.
"I have to follow the advice of my lawyers on how to deal with this," he says. "It's always instinctive for me to punch back if I'm hit, but I can't punch back this time. I can't speak publicly about this or I'm just walking into a trap." His days currently start early, he says, and end late. The hours in between are often either sleepless or filled with troubled dreams. The prospect of prison or a hefty fine is bad enough but several other concerns plague him. "This is not the legal history I wanted to make," he says. "I'm gutted because I feel like I'm on the edge of a cliff again. For me it's the thought of the public humiliation, the fact I could set back the issue of freedom of speech or the right of defence lawyers to speak out on behalf of their clients." There are peaks, he says, and troughs. "Sometimes I'm petrified. Other times, I feel confident that I'm doing the right thing. That's the state of mind I prefer to be in because it makes me feel stronger. The easiest thing in a controversial case with a guilty verdict is to just walk out the back door at court but am I really supposed to bottle it because it's not comfortable for me to speak out?"
Beneath the professional bluster are personal considerations that colour Anwar's thinking. He struck out on his own in 2006 after six years with Beltrami Berlow Solicitors. He is not business-minded - his mother and sister help him with the books - but he is surviving as an independent lawyer. Also in 2006, he married Ifet, the woman who is now the mother of his infant son. "When I'm on my own I get dark thoughts about what this will mean for my family," he says. "Before, I could just say, What happens happens' but now I have to think about my wife and child. I'm mortgaged up to the hilt, I'm in a business, I've borrowed money. Potentially the hearing will mean everything falling apart but I can't allow that to happen." His parents, who live in Liverpool, have been supportive but not entirely sympathetic. "My dad said to me some months ago, Why can't you just shut up? You've got everything you wanted now so just shut up and play the game.' I told him that I didn't become a lawyer just to sit back and rest on my laurels." Anwar's office is situated on the same street as Glasgow's sheriff court, where he won his civil action against the police in 1995. "I remember walking out of that courtroom and telling my dad that I would come back to this street and work as a lawyer," he says. "He laughed and said, Well I hope so, son,' but he didn't believe me. Every time I put on the gown it's a dream come true and I don't want that to be taken away from me."
He repeats several times that he doesn't accept the type of clients he represents - terror suspects, asylum seekers - to win a popularity contest, that if he doesn't smile more in public it's because of the gravity of the issues he has to deal with. But even outside work, the nerves are beginning to fray. "I get extremely angry," he admits. "I can't be angry in court or around my staff so it all blows up at home, around my family and friends, and I can be a complete nightmare to be around." As the hearing date nears, his fears will only get worse, his anxieties greater. He has received considerable public support ahead of the hearing, and has a genuine interest in debating the wider issues his case throws up, but still feels like a canary in the coal mine. Several interconnected images recur when he describes himself, and often with an aura of martyrdom. "I'm pretty much out there on my own," he says. "A sacrificial lamb."
12 DAYS TO GO
APRIL 17. ANWAR'S HOME. GLASGOW
The anger, for a time, has abated. Anwar stands with rolled-up shirt sleeves in the large front room of his Glasgow home. He is smiling frequently, or at least more frequently than usual. As in his office, several press clippings are framed on the wall: one, noticeably, places him at Number 13 on a "most eligible bachelor" list, which presumably is a source of pride. An acoustic guitar, which he can't play, rests against a wall, a "prop" from his bachelor past. But those days are clearly gone. Ifet hands him baby Qais and Anwar bobs him up and down tenderly in his arms. The boy squeaks, grips his father's shirt.
A photo of Anwar as a baby, in which he looks placid, is balanced on a stereo speaker. But even as a child, he insists, his mouth would get him into trouble. "There would be arguments with other kids at school and I would end up getting punched in the face. It didn't matter how much of a kicking I got, I would just carry on saying things. I was an angry boy but it was pent-up frustration because of things like racial abuse in the school playground."
Anwar's parents came to Britain from Pakistan in 1966 when his father, Anwar, was 31 and his mother, Nargis, 18. Both came from wealthy backgrounds and were unconventional in that they married for love. Anwar senior had been a "jet set playboy type" who moved in the same circles as movie stars and once sold a carpet to prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto; Nargis grew up surrounded by chauffeurs, servants and gardeners. Liverpool was a different kettle of korma. Nargis has worked for many years as a social work administrator and is now training to be a magistrate; Anwar senior has retired but once drove buses on double shifts to give Anwar and his sister Saiqa the chance of a private education. "It was bizarre because my dad was just a working-class guy but his ideas were Thatcherite because of the background he came from," says Anwar. "He would drop us off at school in the Ford Cortina. Walking home in my Liverpool Boys College uniform I would get abuse from kids on the street, and then abuse at school because I was the son of a bus driver." To avoid racist taunts, he tried to convince his peers that he was Spanish. It didn't work. A loner, he spent most of his time in the library reading everything other than the books he should have, while his sister worked towards a place at Cambridge.
The chip on his shoulder gradually developed into a "block of flats" but it wasn't until a working holiday to Chicago, when he was 22, that his rage became politicised. The story of Malcolm X, in particular, inspired him. (Today, a huge poster of the political icon with the quote "Liberate our minds by any means necessary" dominates Anwar's stairwell.) He explains that he had originally wanted to join the RAF as a pilot but was turned down after years of preparation due to poor eyesight. He came to Glasgow to study engineering instead, with a view to becoming an aircraft engineer. And then he visited the US. Living conditions in Chicago's black neighbourhoods were "worse than Pakistan" and, to the despair of his parents, he switched degrees to sociology, politics and philosophy.
As an activist, he claims he was already well known to police before his beating in 1991. "At one student demonstration, someone handed me a megaphone and I thought it was great," he recalls. "The cops grabbed me but people were chanting, Let him go'. I was just cocky. I must have been arrested five or six times and was in three different court trials." At 40, he sees no conflict between activism - such as leading a march of G8 protestors to Gleneagles in 2005 - and his professional role as a solicitor, but acknowledges that the duality gets up some people's noses. To borrow a legal image, it's hard to imagine Anwar standing blindfolded with the scales of justice in one hand. More likely he will be jumping on one of the scales to alter the balance, or to snap them from their chains entirely. "People might say there's a blurring of boundaries but why is that a problem?" he says. "Who says the law is impartial and objective? Who says a lawyer must adopt the views of the establishment? The establishment tends to be fairly right-wing, all male and all white, so how does that connect to me? I'm not white, I'm not fairly right-wing and I wasn't born with a silver spoon in my mouth. My role as a defence lawyer is to fight someone's corner. It's hypocritical to find a way of shafting someone behind closed doors and then to come out and say you're impartial."
He is interrupted by the flashing of his mobile phone. The ringtone is a recording of Qais crying at two days old and Anwar smiles broadly every time he hears it. Fatherhood has brought new perspective to his life. "I look at my son and realise what life is really about," he says. "I feel a sense of joy that I've never felt before - it came for the first time when I met Ifet and then again when I met my son. It's something I don't have to campaign about, that I don't have to prove - it's just unconditional love." Despite this, or maybe because of it, the nightmares about his predicament are getting worse. He says he is "incredibly lonely" and that it's hard for him to express what he really feels about his situation beyond the regular outbursts when his anger gets the better of him. In his maudlin moments, he slips into bitter regret. "I think of all the pain I've caused my family," he says. "The things I've put them through. I'm conscious that I've let them down because I've been incredibly self-centred, almost turning my own personal life into a campaign. The ones who are closest to me have always had to stand in a queue until something is done, and then there's always something else."
Naivety and idealism are among Anwar's key traits, even though they come with razor-sharp edges. He is like a terrier that might roll over, but could equally have your hand off. His inability to be gentle, he reckons, is a weakness to be worked on. When he is feeling philosophical about the contempt hearing - and it doesn't come naturally - he says he looks for the positives, that he has a lot still to learn as a lawyer, and that ideas change for the better through struggle. He is affronted that people refuse - increasingly he believes - to speak out about injustice, to stand up and be counted, and remains unafraid to challenge authority.
But it's in the cracks between the hyperbole, beneath all the talk of "the establishment" and right-wing conspiracies, that the real Aamer Anwar resides. "Sometimes when I walk into the common room at court I'm like that little boy at school again looking about and seeing no friends," he says. "It's a case of just go, get your stuff and get out of there."
|
|

Posted by: Chris, Glasgow on 1:09am Sun 27 Apr 08
Don't suppose there's any chance he might go and bring up his son in a less authoritarian state if he is convicted of treating this one with contempt? There must be dozens of muslim countries where people are not treated in such a despicable way just because of their colour or beliefs.
Don't suppose there's any chance he might go and bring up his son in a less authoritarian state if he is convicted of treating this one with contempt? There must be dozens of muslim countries where people are not treated in such a despicable way just because of their colour or beliefs.
Posted by: Alicia Murray, Glasgow on 4:09am Sun 27 Apr 08
What a load of guff. This man has treated the Scottish people with contempt for years the friend who penned this forgot to remind us that not long ago Mr Anwar's wife when she caused a road accident threatened the woman with her husband to try and get ut of it. What pillers of the communuty.
What a load of guff. This man has treated the Scottish people with contempt for years the friend who penned this forgot to remind us that not long ago Mr Anwar's wife when she caused a road accident threatened the woman with her husband to try and get ut of it. What pillers of the communuty.
Posted by: Alicia Murray, Glasgow on 4:09am Sun 27 Apr 08
What a load of guff. This man has treated the Scottish people with contempt for years the friend who penned this forgot to remind us that not long ago Mr Anwar's wife when she caused a road accident threatened the woman with her husband to try and get ut of it. What pillers of the communuty.
What a load of guff. This man has treated the Scottish people with contempt for years the friend who penned this forgot to remind us that not long ago Mr Anwar's wife when she caused a road accident threatened the woman with her husband to try and get ut of it. What pillers of the communuty.
Posted by: Steven Dodds, Glasgow on 5:28am Sun 27 Apr 08
What a lot of guff from Alicia Murray. The man has not treated any Scots person with contempt, he has stood up for the rights of the oppressed against a racist British establishment.
I am also certain that if Alicia Murray had a lawyer as a close relative and was involved in an RTA then she would not be slow to mention it either. Total guff.
Best of luck Mr Anwar, this white Scot ex-policeman wishes you all the best taking on these legal parasites next week. I trust your eventual victory will get right up Alicia Murray's nose.
And by the way, Alicia, its "pillars" and "community" you pillock. I suspect "community" is a concept you are unfamiliar with, so we might let you off with that one.
What a lot of guff from Alicia Murray. The man has not treated any Scots person with contempt, he has stood up for the rights of the oppressed against a racist British establishment.
I am also certain that if Alicia Murray had a lawyer as a close relative and was involved in an RTA then she would not be slow to mention it either. Total guff.
Best of luck Mr Anwar, this white Scot ex-policeman wishes you all the best taking on these legal parasites next week. I trust your eventual victory will get right up Alicia Murray's nose.
And by the way, Alicia, its "pillars" and "community" you pillock. I suspect "community" is a concept you are unfamiliar with, so we might let you off with that one.
Posted by: heady on 9:24am Sun 27 Apr 08
[quote][bold]Steven Dodds[/bold] wrote:
What a lot of guff from Alicia Murray. The man has not treated any Scots person with contempt, he has stood up for the rights of the oppressed against a racist British establishment. I am also certain that if Alicia Murray had a lawyer as a close relative and was involved in an RTA then she would not be slow to mention it either. Total guff. Best of luck Mr Anwar, this white Scot ex-policeman wishes you all the best taking on these legal parasites next week. I trust your eventual victory will get right up Alicia Murray's nose. And by the way, Alicia, its "pillars" and "community" you pillock. I suspect "community" is a concept you are unfamiliar with, so we might let you off with that one.[/quote] I suppose someone whose identity in life is "white Scot ex-policeman" would think like you. Please tell me you don’t own a t-shirt proclaiming you are “proud” of this identity of yours.
Mr Anwar is a funny cove. He used to be a socialist, though how much he knew about socialist theory or principle is not known, but now he seems entirely focussed on race questions. What would his young self, who was not trying to build his legal business, think of defending theocratic terrorists (whether Islamic or Americans like Bush and Rumsfeld)?
And what would the young Aamer with his face smashed in by an officer of the racist state think of defending coppers who fabricate evidence to send innocent people to jail? Last year Mr Anwar defended an Edinburgh cop who tried to get a bloke sent to jail for domestic abuse by inventing a confession (where have we heard that sort of thing before). The cop was exposed perjuring himself and what was Mr Anwar’s defence to the media outside the court – why, his poor client was the real victim as he had been so distressed by racism in Lothian and Borders police that, rather than go to his union or black and Asian associations in the police or an employment tribunal or a senior officer or the Commission for Racial Equality he felt he just had to fit up an innocent man.
Mr Anwar may be Scotland's most prominent human rights lawyer for crooked cops and god-botherers - he certainly puts the self-promotion effort in - but "prominent" does not mean successful or competent.
Steven Dodds wrote:
What a lot of guff from Alicia Murray. The man has not treated any Scots person with contempt, he has stood up for the rights of the oppressed against a racist British establishment. I am also certain that if Alicia Murray had a lawyer as a close relative and was involved in an RTA then she would not be slow to mention it either. Total guff. Best of luck Mr Anwar, this white Scot ex-policeman wishes you all the best taking on these legal parasites next week. I trust your eventual victory will get right up Alicia Murray's nose. And by the way, Alicia, its "pillars" and "community" you pillock. I suspect "community" is a concept you are unfamiliar with, so we might let you off with that one.
I suppose someone whose identity in life is "white Scot ex-policeman" would think like you. Please tell me you don’t own a t-shirt proclaiming you are “proud” of this identity of yours.
Mr Anwar is a funny cove. He used to be a socialist, though how much he knew about socialist theory or principle is not known, but now he seems entirely focussed on race questions. What would his young self, who was not trying to build his legal business, think of defending theocratic terrorists (whether Islamic or Americans like Bush and Rumsfeld)?
And what would the young Aamer with his face smashed in by an officer of the racist state think of defending coppers who fabricate evidence to send innocent people to jail? Last year Mr Anwar defended an Edinburgh cop who tried to get a bloke sent to jail for domestic abuse by inventing a confession (where have we heard that sort of thing before). The cop was exposed perjuring himself and what was Mr Anwar’s defence to the media outside the court – why, his poor client was the real victim as he had been so distressed by racism in Lothian and Borders police that, rather than go to his union or black and Asian associations in the police or an employment tribunal or a senior officer or the Commission for Racial Equality he felt he just had to fit up an innocent man.
Mr Anwar may be Scotland's most prominent human rights lawyer for crooked cops and god-botherers - he certainly puts the self-promotion effort in - but "prominent" does not mean successful or competent.
Posted by: mt on 10:22am Sun 27 Apr 08
"He (Gordon Brown P.M.) is also very Scottish, which doesn't help him bond with the majority population of the UK" This appears in another article today.
People are discriminated against because they are male, female, young, old, able bodied, disabled, big, small, rich, poor, Scottish, Pakistani,..... This goes on all over the world. A wee bit of humour and fun can resolve many an issue.
If a parent has the ability to give their child a gift, it should be a happy childhood. I trust Mr Anwar will find a release for his anger and not pass it onto his child
"He (Gordon Brown P.M.) is also very Scottish, which doesn't help him bond with the majority population of the UK" This appears in another article today.
People are discriminated against because they are male, female, young, old, able bodied, disabled, big, small, rich, poor, Scottish, Pakistani,..... This goes on all over the world. A wee bit of humour and fun can resolve many an issue.
If a parent has the ability to give their child a gift, it should be a happy childhood. I trust Mr Anwar will find a release for his anger and not pass it onto his child
Posted by: angiebobs, defending free speech on 12:00pm Sun 27 Apr 08
We should wish for more people like Aamer to become lawyers and speak out. If we let a lawyer like Aamer be silenced then what chance do the rest of us have? This charge is a disgrace that threatens to make a mockery of any idea of a free and independant legal system- regardless of whether you agree with him or not. Thankfully there are many, many people from allwalks of life who can see this and are supporting Aamer - just as he has supported others, so good luck Aamer!!
We should wish for more people like Aamer to become lawyers and speak out. If we let a lawyer like Aamer be silenced then what chance do the rest of us have? This charge is a disgrace that threatens to make a mockery of any idea of a free and independant legal system- regardless of whether you agree with him or not. Thankfully there are many, many people from allwalks of life who can see this and are supporting Aamer - just as he has supported others, so good luck Aamer!!
Posted by: asif, wee town 30 miles out side glasgow on 12:21pm Sun 27 Apr 08
i have known aamer for approx 2 years, a man i have come to know as being focused and determined to fix a social wrong, regaardless of the outcome.
he remainds me of the books i use to read on history as a kid in school.
[bold]AAMER ANWAR IS A LIONHEART. HE is a peoples champion.[/bold] and a truly wish him and his family all the best. i confirm i will be attending court in edin when this contempt hearing happens. .
i have known aamer for approx 2 years, a man i have come to know as being focused and determined to fix a social wrong, regaardless of the outcome.
he remainds me of the books i use to read on history as a kid in school.
AAMER ANWAR IS A LIONHEART. HE is a peoples champion. and a truly wish him and his family all the best. i confirm i will be attending court in edin when this contempt hearing happens. .
Posted by: david on 2:44pm Sun 27 Apr 08
Lord Carloway views on Aammer Anwar lack any hint of objectivity. His actions show contempt for free speech. Lord carloway seem to be abusing his privileged position to pursue a political issue behind the closed doors, wigs and cloaks of the Scottish legal establishment. His actions are entirely inappropriate for someone holding his accountable position.
Hopefully good sense will eventually prevail and the people will be able to use the justice sytem to bring the Lord to account.
In the interest of justice - Mr Anwar must win.
Lord Carloway views on Aammer Anwar lack any hint of objectivity. His actions show contempt for free speech. Lord carloway seem to be abusing his privileged position to pursue a political issue behind the closed doors, wigs and cloaks of the Scottish legal establishment. His actions are entirely inappropriate for someone holding his accountable position.
Hopefully good sense will eventually prevail and the people will be able to use the justice sytem to bring the Lord to account.
In the interest of justice - Mr Anwar must win.
Posted by: Mark Boyle, Johnstone on 3:41pm Sun 27 Apr 08
As someone at the University of Glasgow at the time Aamer Anwar was a student, I hope to live long enough to see this evil little toad finally put behind bars where he belongs.
Some of you muppets worshipping him as some sort of "champion" - rather than just another Matthew Proctor who plays the race card thrice before cockcrow - should go take GOOD LONG LOOK at copies of the Glasgow University Guardian newspaper from the period he was there.
He is an embarrassment to the legal profession, and an even bigger embarrassment to Scotland's Asians - let alone Muslims - most of which want nothing to do with him, but because he's got friends in the right places (ie. the luvvies of the Scottish Left Review & the bully-boy thugs of Scottish Solidarity and the Socialist Workers Party - the latter of which he used to run in Scotland) he gets "poster boy" status with the media, who are too scared to say anything nasty about him (save for the Daily Express, who have been on his case for some years as they have several Glasgow Uni [italic]alumni[/italic] on their staff)
Try asking Sandy McCormie or Tony Leitch about what they thinks of this "human rights lawyer" & his tactics - you might get a nasty little shock about your "hero".
As someone at the University of Glasgow at the time Aamer Anwar was a student, I hope to live long enough to see this evil little toad finally put behind bars where he belongs.
Some of you muppets worshipping him as some sort of "champion" - rather than just another Matthew Proctor who plays the race card thrice before cockcrow - should go take GOOD LONG LOOK at copies of the Glasgow University Guardian newspaper from the period he was there.
He is an embarrassment to the legal profession, and an even bigger embarrassment to Scotland's Asians - let alone Muslims - most of which want nothing to do with him, but because he's got friends in the right places (ie. the luvvies of the Scottish Left Review & the bully-boy thugs of Scottish Solidarity and the Socialist Workers Party - the latter of which he used to run in Scotland) he gets "poster boy" status with the media, who are too scared to say anything nasty about him (save for the Daily Express, who have been on his case for some years as they have several Glasgow Uni
alumni on their staff)
Try asking Sandy McCormie or Tony Leitch about what they thinks of this "human rights lawyer" & his tactics - you might get a nasty little shock about your "hero".
Posted by: Edward Schwienbacher on 6:42pm Sun 27 Apr 08
If Amar is struck off for speaking out about issues others in the UK legal profession are too timid to tackle in an environment of increasing conservative intimidation, he should stand for election to Parliament where he will certainly put his substantial skills to better use and reform the 'thought police laws' enshrined in UK Law after 9-11. Wish him well.
If Amar is struck off for speaking out about issues others in the UK legal profession are too timid to tackle in an environment of increasing conservative intimidation, he should stand for election to Parliament where he will certainly put his substantial skills to better use and reform the 'thought police laws' enshrined in UK Law after 9-11. Wish him well.
Posted by: david, 219-153 on 7:53pm Sun 27 Apr 08
In relation to Mark Boyle's comment no rebuttal is necessary. His method appears to consist in haughty denunciation and smear, to which overriding goal every anecdote and citation is subordinated.
It is simple abuse based on the dyspeptic personal testimony and a few highly selective musings on the contents of other posts - it's utterly worthless for the purposes of debate. There is then an obviously self-serving recount of his previous contre-temps with Mr Anwar as a student, which takes up the initial paragragh in a vain and spurious attempt to establish audience credibility. Such post are largely worthless , and larded with irrelevant insults and conjecture
The supererogatory relish he obviously takes in flat-footed condescension and vilification is one of his signatures. He is ultimately an apologist for the premeditated and totally unnecessary repression of free speech and promotion of establishment rights and privilege. And as students of propaganda know, it is never about argument, or debate: one does not try and enter into a reasoned discussion with an advertisement. It is about shaping perceptions, and that is why so much of Boyle’s discussion is given over to insulting and denouncing his opponents, assuring the reader of their worthlessness and incompetence, baldly asserting what he knows he has done so little to prove, before adverting to what turns out to be a limited base of evidence.
In relation to Mark Boyle's comment no rebuttal is necessary. His method appears to consist in haughty denunciation and smear, to which overriding goal every anecdote and citation is subordinated.
It is simple abuse based on the dyspeptic personal testimony and a few highly selective musings on the contents of other posts - it's utterly worthless for the purposes of debate. There is then an obviously self-serving recount of his previous contre-temps with Mr Anwar as a student, which takes up the initial paragragh in a vain and spurious attempt to establish audience credibility. Such post are largely worthless , and larded with irrelevant insults and conjecture
The supererogatory relish he obviously takes in flat-footed condescension and vilification is one of his signatures. He is ultimately an apologist for the premeditated and totally unnecessary repression of free speech and promotion of establishment rights and privilege. And as students of propaganda know, it is never about argument, or debate: one does not try and enter into a reasoned discussion with an advertisement. It is about shaping perceptions, and that is why so much of Boyle’s discussion is given over to insulting and denouncing his opponents, assuring the reader of their worthlessness and incompetence, baldly asserting what he knows he has done so little to prove, before adverting to what turns out to be a limited base of evidence.
Posted by: T. MUIR, EDINBURGH on 8:26pm Sun 27 Apr 08
I do not think that Mr. Anwar should be on the end of a finding for contempt but those supporting him should read what the Judge actually said about the comments outside the court. And remember that there has been a feeble attempt at an apology already by Mr. Anwar for his remarks.
What he said was not a fair account of the verdict of the jury. He needs to take proper responsibility for his own words rather than making himself a victim and making this a free speech issue.
I do not think that Mr. Anwar should be on the end of a finding for contempt but those supporting him should read what the Judge actually said about the comments outside the court. And remember that there has been a feeble attempt at an apology already by Mr. Anwar for his remarks.
What he said was not a fair account of the verdict of the jury. He needs to take proper responsibility for his own words rather than making himself a victim and making this a free speech issue.
Posted by: angiebobs, possil on 9:36pm Sun 27 Apr 08
T.Muir- this is not about what the judge said - I would support his right to say what he feels as much as Aamers- the issue is that aamer is now facing a serious charge in court.
It is others like me- not aamer- who see this as a free speech issue - todays page in sunday herald shows this.
Again, regardless of whether you agree with aamer anwar or not - this is a dangerous precedent and one which should scare those who wish to see decent legal system with the right of all to say unpopular things!So by all means disagree but stand against this charge.
T.Muir- this is not about what the judge said - I would support his right to say what he feels as much as Aamers- the issue is that aamer is now facing a serious charge in court.
It is others like me- not aamer- who see this as a free speech issue - todays page in sunday herald shows this.
Again, regardless of whether you agree with aamer anwar or not - this is a dangerous precedent and one which should scare those who wish to see decent legal system with the right of all to say unpopular things!So by all means disagree but stand against this charge.
Posted by: T. MUIR, EDINBURGH on 9:51pm Sun 27 Apr 08
Angiebobs,
As I said I agree that there should be no charge for what he said. The trial was over and contempt laws are usually used before the verdict.
The slight problem here is that what he said was inaccurate and he should come clean about that. It would leave the issue a bit clearer.
I don't think this is a serious attempt to stop anyone commenting on unpopular issues. If it was I would be in court this week too.
There are plenty of people commenting on these issues in the media on a weekly basis without any problems.
Lawyers should be more careful what they say and I hate to see us going down the American path of press conferences on the doorstep of the court. I hate it when the police do it too.
Angiebobs,
As I said I agree that there should be no charge for what he said. The trial was over and contempt laws are usually used before the verdict.
The slight problem here is that what he said was inaccurate and he should come clean about that. It would leave the issue a bit clearer.
I don't think this is a serious attempt to stop anyone commenting on unpopular issues. If it was I would be in court this week too.
There are plenty of people commenting on these issues in the media on a weekly basis without any problems.
Lawyers should be more careful what they say and I hate to see us going down the American path of press conferences on the doorstep of the court. I hate it when the police do it too.
Posted by: david on 9:12am Mon 28 Apr 08
T Muir:
If the trial was over and "contempt laws are usually used before the verdict" - why is this move (which is without precedent in Scottish legal history) not considered by you as a serious attempt to stop anyone commenting on unpopular issues? Aamer Anwar is facing a fine, imprisonment and career ruin. All this because a career Lord who's personal and establishment friendly views have are very likely to have influenced his decision decides to flex his unaccountable muscles. He certainly cannot be considered to be acting objectively. He appears hellbent in setting legal history with regard to the restriction of free speech in Scotland. It all sounds pretty serious to me.
You say that 'these issues' are commented on in the media on a weekly basis - this is true but predominantly from a hostile perspective towards muslims. The journalists and commentators pen such material get richly rewarded by Murdoch et al for their service. They don't face imprisonment and contempt charges! The media now predominantly treat muslims in the same way they treated the Irish in the 70s and 80s - promoting fear and anxiety among the general populus towards one particular group in society. It is vital that all perspectives can be openly discussed without fear of recrimination.
T Muir:
If the trial was over and "contempt laws are usually used before the verdict" - why is this move (which is without precedent in Scottish legal history) not considered by you as a serious attempt to stop anyone commenting on unpopular issues? Aamer Anwar is facing a fine, imprisonment and career ruin. All this because a career Lord who's personal and establishment friendly views have are very likely to have influenced his decision decides to flex his unaccountable muscles. He certainly cannot be considered to be acting objectively. He appears hellbent in setting legal history with regard to the restriction of free speech in Scotland. It all sounds pretty serious to me.
You say that 'these issues' are commented on in the media on a weekly basis - this is true but predominantly from a hostile perspective towards muslims. The journalists and commentators pen such material get richly rewarded by Murdoch et al for their service. They don't face imprisonment and contempt charges! The media now predominantly treat muslims in the same way they treated the Irish in the 70s and 80s - promoting fear and anxiety among the general populus towards one particular group in society. It is vital that all perspectives can be openly discussed without fear of recrimination.
Posted by: A Different David, Glasgow on 10:18am Mon 28 Apr 08
I have always found Aamer Anwar to be a loathesome individual; unpleasant and arrogant in person.
I have always found Aamer Anwar to be a loathesome individual; unpleasant and arrogant in person.
Posted by: thelozza, Glasgow on 11:27am Mon 28 Apr 08
[quote][bold]A Different David[/bold] wrote:
I have always found Aamer Anwar to be a loathesome individual; unpleasant and arrogant in person. [/quote] thats interesting, but irrelevant to the debate.
A Different David wrote:
I have always found Aamer Anwar to be a loathesome individual; unpleasant and arrogant in person.
thats interesting, but irrelevant to the debate.
Posted by: lisa0077 on 12:11pm Mon 28 Apr 08
A different David, do you find your insulting commentary useful for the purposes of serious intellectual debate?? I refer you back to David 219-153. Are we interested in peoples personal slanderous opinions of Mr Anwar or are we discussing slightly more serious issues of free speech that lie at the heart of this case?
I would expect to find your comments amidst the daily plethora of tabloid propaganda, the Sun for example, were undoubtedly your remarks would be more useful, informative and effective.
A different David, do you find your insulting commentary useful for the purposes of serious intellectual debate?? I refer you back to David 219-153. Are we interested in peoples personal slanderous opinions of Mr Anwar or are we discussing slightly more serious issues of free speech that lie at the heart of this case?
I would expect to find your comments amidst the daily plethora of tabloid propaganda, the Sun for example, were undoubtedly your remarks would be more useful, informative and effective.
Posted by: Jasi, Glasgow on 1:52pm Mon 28 Apr 08
A Different David describes Aamer:
I have always found Aamer Anwar to be a loathsome individual; unpleasant and arrogant in person.
My question is how well do you know the man, what gives you the right to criticise or judge a man due to prejudices you carry, you call him arrogant but maybe it’s his sense of right and wrong that scares you.
Aamer simply believes in what he does, so why is he being bulled by people who probably don’t have any morals in life.
I’ve known Aamer for 10 years and I know he is not a 'cunning manipulator', he stands up for people who are in vulnerable positions and don’t have the means to fight their battles, he gives them legal support and advice, but more importantly ‘the so called monster’ becomes a member of their family. If Aamer is so unpleasant why do people like the Chhokar family treat him like their own son?
A Different David describes Aamer:
I have always found Aamer Anwar to be a loathsome individual; unpleasant and arrogant in person.
My question is how well do you know the man, what gives you the right to criticise or judge a man due to prejudices you carry, you call him arrogant but maybe it’s his sense of right and wrong that scares you.
Aamer simply believes in what he does, so why is he being bulled by people who probably don’t have any morals in life.
I’ve known Aamer for 10 years and I know he is not a 'cunning manipulator', he stands up for people who are in vulnerable positions and don’t have the means to fight their battles, he gives them legal support and advice, but more importantly ‘the so called monster’ becomes a member of their family. If Aamer is so unpleasant why do people like the Chhokar family treat him like their own son?
Posted by: mb, glasgow on 12:44am Tue 29 Apr 08
Mark Boyle: who cares about Sandy Mcormie or Tony Leitch, and who the hell are they?
As a Muslim I find your unfounded comment that 'He [Aamer Anwar] is an embarrassment to the legal profession, and an even bigger embarrassment to Scotland's Asians - let alone Muslims - most of which want nothing to do with him' - incredibly bizarre because, as a Muslim, I have never encountered (yet) a Muslim or even other asians who have spoken badly of him. They are actually proud that he is a symbol of justice & hope in this society & in this day & age when its easier to speak for what is expected rather than what is the truth and right. You are seriously misinformed (or just plain ignorant) about what you think or claim to know about the views about the muslims/ asians of Glasgow. You didn't provide any basis for believing he is a 'toad' but then again ignorant minds rarely do. Aamer Anwar is a good person based on his beliefs, actions and practice! People like you are aplenty - you want to see all good symbols squashed and stamped out - not going to happen, one falls another rises.
Mark Boyle: who cares about Sandy Mcormie or Tony Leitch, and who the hell are they?
As a Muslim I find your unfounded comment that 'He is an embarrassment to the legal profession, and an even bigger embarrassment to Scotland's Asians - let alone Muslims - most of which want nothing to do with him' - incredibly bizarre because, as a Muslim, I have never encountered (yet) a Muslim or even other asians who have spoken badly of him. They are actually proud that he is a symbol of justice & hope in this society & in this day & age when its easier to speak for what is expected rather than what is the truth and right. You are seriously misinformed (or just plain ignorant) about what you think or claim to know about the views about the muslims/ asians of Glasgow. You didn't provide any basis for believing he is a 'toad' but then again ignorant minds rarely do. Aamer Anwar is a good person based on his beliefs, actions and practice! People like you are aplenty - you want to see all good symbols squashed and stamped out - not going to happen, one falls another rises.
Posted by: lisa j, falkirk on 12:49am Tue 29 Apr 08
mark boyle - you come across are really bitter & jealous. get that looked into - aamer anwar is a great lawyer. it seems 2 me as though u may have lost (badly in some mock trials or something to have such bitterness towards him)! i agree with mb - when have muslims been embarassed by him? go speak 2 some muslims by the way, you may be shocked 2 hear they actually like the guy.
mark boyle - you come across are really bitter & jealous. get that looked into - aamer anwar is a great lawyer. it seems 2 me as though u may have lost (badly in some mock trials or something to have such bitterness towards him)! i agree with mb - when have muslims been embarassed by him? go speak 2 some muslims by the way, you may be shocked 2 hear they actually like the guy.
Posted by: T, glasgow on 12:59am Tue 29 Apr 08
[quote][bold]Alicia Murray[/bold] wrote:
What a load of guff. This man has treated the Scottish people with contempt for years the friend who penned this forgot to remind us that not long ago Mr Anwar's wife when she caused a road accident threatened the woman with her husband to try and get ut of it. What pillers of the communuty.[/quote] Alicia, learn how to spell before leaving a comment.
Alicia Murray wrote:
What a load of guff. This man has treated the Scottish people with contempt for years the friend who penned this forgot to remind us that not long ago Mr Anwar's wife when she caused a road accident threatened the woman with her husband to try and get ut of it. What pillers of the communuty.
Alicia, learn how to spell before leaving a comment.
Posted by: Ivor Stratocastor, Glasgow on 2:14am Tue 29 Apr 08
It is great to see a man who is not afraid to stand up to the establishment. A man who speaks his mind against injustice and oppression. A man who fights for the common man with such passion and commitment that he jeopardises his own life and career. I can go on and on and I wish I had the balls to be like Aamer Anwar. He is one of a kind and we should all be so grateful to have him amongst us. We need more people like him in these crazy times. Where is the justice when a man (Blair) kills thousands of innocent people including British soldiers and walks away as a hero while another man ( Aamer ) is facing prison over something he said. This country talks big about democracy and freedom of speech but doesn't practise any of it. One million people marched against the Iraq war but who listened. These are the same people who elected the despot Blair in a democratic society yet he refused to listen to them. Call this democracy?? I thought democracy was when a leader was elected by the people for the people!!But all this goes out the window when he decides to attack a muslim country. Similarly freedom of speech is only enjoyed if you are white and certainly not if you are a muslim as in the case of Aamer. Aamer you are not alone , we will stand shoulder to shoulder with you to fight this gross injustice!!
It is great to see a man who is not afraid to stand up to the establishment. A man who speaks his mind against injustice and oppression. A man who fights for the common man with such passion and commitment that he jeopardises his own life and career. I can go on and on and I wish I had the balls to be like Aamer Anwar. He is one of a kind and we should all be so grateful to have him amongst us. We need more people like him in these crazy times. Where is the justice when a man (Blair) kills thousands of innocent people including British soldiers and walks away as a hero while another man ( Aamer ) is facing prison over something he said. This country talks big about democracy and freedom of speech but doesn't practise any of it. One million people marched against the Iraq war but who listened. These are the same people who elected the despot Blair in a democratic society yet he refused to listen to them. Call this democracy?? I thought democracy was when a leader was elected by the people for the people!!But all this goes out the window when he decides to attack a muslim country. Similarly freedom of speech is only enjoyed if you are white and certainly not if you are a muslim as in the case of Aamer. Aamer you are not alone , we will stand shoulder to shoulder with you to fight this gross injustice!!
Posted by: Jim Monaghan on 3:18pm Tue 29 Apr 08
This is a vital battle, it is free speech and the right of defence that is on trial as much as Aamer Anwar.
His comments were no different from many comments made outside of courts. His clients wanted to make their views clear and he was their conduit to do that. Newspapers, TV programmes and others constantly comment on cases after verdicts and call them unfair, injustices etc, lawyers also do after many cases. It seems it is only the Siddique family and their legal representatives who are prevented from doing so.
I thnk that the judge is a tad too defensive and perhaps some of Aamers Anwar's comments embarrassed him. But the justice system cannot be based on a judge's angry reaction to criticism.
I am glad that the entire legal establishment have backed Aamer as it is a fight for all of them, and all of us who might need them one day.
The Siddique lad is in jail for what millions of wee pseudo Irish republicans and loyalists do all week every week!
This is a vital battle, it is free speech and the right of defence that is on trial as much as Aamer Anwar.
His comments were no different from many comments made outside of courts. His clients wanted to make their views clear and he was their conduit to do that. Newspapers, TV programmes and others constantly comment on cases after verdicts and call them unfair, injustices etc, lawyers also do after many cases. It seems it is only the Siddique family and their legal representatives who are prevented from doing so.
I thnk that the judge is a tad too defensive and perhaps some of Aamers Anwar's comments embarrassed him. But the justice system cannot be based on a judge's angry reaction to criticism.
I am glad that the entire legal establishment have backed Aamer as it is a fight for all of them, and all of us who might need them one day.
The Siddique lad is in jail for what millions of wee pseudo Irish republicans and loyalists do all week every week!
Posted by: Utter Shambles on 8:43pm Tue 29 Apr 08
Personally can't stand Mr Anwar, and worry he sacrifices clients in the name of his ego. On this matter however I hope he wins. If not we could all be charged with contempt, if we feel we have suffered an injustice in court. Imagine a member of your family has been seriously assaulted or worse, and at the end of the trial the judge gives what you consider an unjust or lenient sentence. In theory if you make a comment to the press he/she dislikes you could be charged with contempt. It really is about time someone challenged Judges, those 'unaccountable, people, who's knowledge and appreciation of everyday life, and the misery people suffer from crime could be carved on the back of an aspirin with an ice pick!
Personally can't stand Mr Anwar, and worry he sacrifices clients in the name of his ego. On this matter however I hope he wins. If not we could all be charged with contempt, if we feel we have suffered an injustice in court. Imagine a member of your family has been seriously assaulted or worse, and at the end of the trial the judge gives what you consider an unjust or lenient sentence. In theory if you make a comment to the press he/she dislikes you could be charged with contempt. It really is about time someone challenged Judges, those 'unaccountable, people, who's knowledge and appreciation of everyday life, and the misery people suffer from crime could be carved on the back of an aspirin with an ice pick!
Posted by: asif (2), Glasgow on 12:47pm Wed 30 Apr 08
This article is a littloe too conveniently timed for my liking. "Placed" was the first thought which came into my head.
AA has had his card marked for a while (rightly or wrongly) by the legal community. Anecdotal evidence suggests his legal skills are severely lacking and that he is driven more by his own profile than the pure provision of legal services to clients. His cases are always high profile, which riles some, but he rarely seems to be successful, which is telling.
On this current matter of contempt of court he has been especially slippery. I do not believe that the words he espoused on the day of the judgment were opriginally those of his client, but altered to make them more "wloquent" by AA afterwards. Most people, I suspect, believe that they were his, and it is ultimately quite sad that this individual who has always stood behind his convictions and has spoken his mind, now choose to hide behind his client and ask him to accept that the views were his and not Anwar's. He should at least have the strength of character to stand behind what he said and defend it, rather than hiding.
This is a little pathetic and I will be interested to see how/if he recovers after the verict (whatever that may be).
This article is a littloe too conveniently timed for my liking. "Placed" was the first thought which came into my head.
AA has had his card marked for a while (rightly or wrongly) by the legal community. Anecdotal evidence suggests his legal skills are severely lacking and that he is driven more by his own profile than the pure provision of legal services to clients. His cases are always high profile, which riles some, but he rarely seems to be successful, which is telling.
On this current matter of contempt of court he has been especially slippery. I do not believe that the words he espoused on the day of the judgment were opriginally those of his client, but altered to make them more "wloquent" by AA afterwards. Most people, I suspect, believe that they were his, and it is ultimately quite sad that this individual who has always stood behind his convictions and has spoken his mind, now choose to hide behind his client and ask him to accept that the views were his and not Anwar's. He should at least have the strength of character to stand behind what he said and defend it, rather than hiding.
This is a little pathetic and I will be interested to see how/if he recovers after the verict (whatever that may be).
Posted by: Sidra on 1:52pm Thu 1 May 08
[quote][bold]Jim Monaghan[/bold] wrote:
This is a vital battle, it is free speech and the right of defence that is on trial as much as Aamer Anwar.
His comments were no different from many comments made outside of courts. His clients wanted to make their views clear and he was their conduit to do that. Newspapers, TV programmes and others constantly comment on cases after verdicts and call them unfair, injustices etc, lawyers also do after many cases. It seems it is only the Siddique family and their legal representatives who are prevented from doing so.
I thnk that the judge is a tad too defensive and perhaps some of Aamers Anwar's comments embarrassed him. But the justice system cannot be based on a judge's angry reaction to criticism.
I am glad that the entire legal establishment have backed Aamer as it is a fight for all of them, and all of us who might need them one day.
The Siddique lad is in jail for what millions of wee pseudo Irish republicans and loyalists do all week every week! [/quote] The entire legal establishment have not backed anwar. That's just a stupid thing to say.
If the entire legal establishment backed him, he would never have been in court this week, would he?
Jim Monaghan wrote:
This is a vital battle, it is free speech and the right of defence that is on trial as much as Aamer Anwar.
His comments were no different from many comments made outside of courts. His clients wanted to make their views clear and he was their conduit to do that. Newspapers, TV programmes and others constantly comment on cases after verdicts and call them unfair, injustices etc, lawyers also do after many cases. It seems it is only the Siddique family and their legal representatives who are prevented from doing so.
I thnk that the judge is a tad too defensive and perhaps some of Aamers Anwar's comments embarrassed him. But the justice system cannot be based on a judge's angry reaction to criticism.
I am glad that the entire legal establishment have backed Aamer as it is a fight for all of them, and all of us who might need them one day.
The Siddique lad is in jail for what millions of wee pseudo Irish republicans and loyalists do all week every week!
The entire legal establishment have not backed anwar. That's just a stupid thing to say.
If the entire legal establishment backed him, he would never have been in court this week, would he?
Posted by: Aamer's client, Scotland on 2:51am Sat 3 May 08
I am 1 of Aamer's client and will say that he is far from arrogant, unpleasant or loathesome. My case was not high profile and Aamer defended it and WON !!!
I am a muslim and very proud to know Aamer and highly respect him for having the courage to stand up and fight for justice.
I am 1 of Aamer's client and will say that he is far from arrogant, unpleasant or loathesome. My case was not high profile and Aamer defended it and WON !!!
I am a muslim and very proud to know Aamer and highly respect him for having the courage to stand up and fight for justice.
Posted by: Whatastar, Glasgow on 11:25am Tue 6 May 08
He is not Scotland "most prominent" or "leading" human rights lawyer at all. I can think of at least 3 or 4 lawyers who are experts on the area (for example Alan Millar) and who would wipe the floor with this upstart.
He is not Scotland "most prominent" or "leading" human rights lawyer at all. I can think of at least 3 or 4 lawyers who are experts on the area (for example Alan Millar) and who would wipe the floor with this upstart.