Revealed: MSPs who put family on the payroll ALMOST 50 MSPs have given parliamentary jobs to members of their immediate family, a Sunday Herald investigation has revealed. Hundreds of thousands of pounds of public cash have been taken out of the Holyrood expenses scheme to put MSPs' spouses, children and in-laws on the state-funded payroll.
Some have employed two relatives at the same time in what critics describe as a scam to "top up the incomes of their nearest and dearest".
The revelation comes as MSPs demand larger chunks of public money for staff. An independent review is currently examining the parliament's allowances scheme, an inquiry that has prompted members to call for their staffing budget to be increased.
However, Holyrood staff registers show an injection of public funds will have the effect of boosting the family income of a large number of MSPs: 47 of whom have hired a relative since 1999.
Of those elected on May, 18 are currently employing a family member, including seven new members of the Scottish parliament.
Liberal Democrat MSP Jim Tolson has hired his wife Alison, while his colleague, Orkney member Liam McArthur, has also given a job to his spouse, Tamsin Bailey.
The SNP's Angela Constance, MSP for Livingston, employs her mother-in-law, Mary, on a part-time basis and employed her sister-in-law, Heather, temporarily.
Similarly, James Kelly, member for Glasgow Rutherglen, employs his wife Alexa, while colleague Willie Coffey has found space in his office for wife Helen.
Holyrood's youngest MSP, 27-year-old Nationalist Aileen Campbell, is registered as having hired her mum, Ann.
Meanwhile, several members of the new SNP government have given plum parliamentary jobs to relatives.
Health secretary Nicola Sturgeon, who used to employ her sister Gillian, currently has her mother Joan working for her, while communities minister Stewart Maxwell has hired his wife Mary, according to the register.
Brian Adam, the SNP chief whip who used to employ his son David, is now registered as having found work for another of his sons, 21-year-old Alan, while Labour whip Michael McMahon employs his daughter Siobhan and wife Margaret.
Further examination of the current staff register shows a battery of other MSPs hiring spouses, siblings and children. Helen Eadie, the Labour member for Dunfermline East, employs her husband Bob, while colleague Elaine Murray has her spouse Jeffrey on the payroll.
Sandra White, Nationalist MSP for Glasgow, used to employ her daughter Jennifer, and now has her son Christopher working for her. Fellow SNP member Christine Grahame employs her brother Tony, while Labour MSP Marlyn Glen is registered as having found work for her son Alasdair.
MSPs Andy Kerr, John Farquhar Munro and Hugh Henry have all employed their wives in the past, while ex-members Nora Radcliffe and George Lyon reportedly hired their daughters.
LibDem MSP Jamie Stone, an enthusiastic user of the allowances scheme, has employed two relatives, one of whom was his daughter. The Sunday Herald also understands that few, if any, of the jobs awarded to relatives were advertised or offered to a wider group of people. None of the MSPs contacted by the paper revealed how much they were paying their relatives.
In addition, several MSPs are employing the family members of party colleagues, such as Labour MSP Rhona Brankin, who has the wife of former MSP Bristow Muldoon working for her.
Finance secretary John Swinney has employed the son of SNP president Ian Hudghton, while former first minister Jack McConnell used to employ Christina Marshall, the daughter of a Labour MP.
The issue is controversial because the allowances review is being used by MSPs - including some named here - to demand extra cash for staff. Christine Grahame said she wanted an "independent appraisal of existing and proposed staff for placement on that structured pay scale". Jim Tolson said in his allowances submission that his £50,000 annual staffing bill was not generous enough.
Other MSPs who have complained about wages for staff include Labour's Trish Godman and George Foulkes, the latter of whom said the system was "paradoxical and unfair".
MSPs have also suggested other ways in which their allowances budget could be topped up with extra public cash. Labour member Jackie Baillie has floated the suggestion of a special communications budget, with which MSPs could update constituents about their activities. Her colleague Karen Whitefield believes additional allowances for fridges, heaters and fire extinguishers should be made available to MSPs.
One MSP, who did not want to be named, said: "I think employing relatives can be justified on the grounds that MSPs need to be able to trust the people they work with. It's also the case that MSPs hire family members because no-one else will work for such low pay."
The Campaign Director of the TaxPayers' Alliance, Blair Gibbs, said: "If employing family members is not against the parliamentary rules, it should be. They may be performing a valid role, but MSPs are nonetheless using taxpayers' money to top up the incomes and no doubt pensions of their nearest and dearest. If politicians can't see how bad this looks, it only proves how out of touch they've become."
A Scottish parliament spokeswoman said: "Members employ staff to support their work, which is paid for through the Members Support Allowance. Members are responsible for who they recruit to provide this support.
"The Members Support Allowance is part of the Allowances Review currently being undertaken by the review panel, which is expected to report no later than March 2008."
Margo MacDonald, the Lothians MSP, defended the practice of MSPs employing their spouses. "There are a number of husband and wife partnerships at Holyrood and Westminster, and I wouldn't condemn it," she said.
"It keeps a marriage secure in a profession that is notorious for causing marriage break-ups. It could also be said to save taxpayers money."
|
|

Posted by: Im not really here on 9:40pm Sat 22 Sep 07
When you need someone to take care of your personal affairs and to be intimately involved in your day-to-day life, who better than a family member you can trust - particularly if they have been working with you for years.
Did the SH expect us to say "Oh shock, horror".
When you need someone to take care of your personal affairs and to be intimately involved in your day-to-day life, who better than a family member you can trust - particularly if they have been working with you for years.
Did the SH expect us to say "Oh shock, horror".
Posted by: Amanda on 9:59pm Sat 22 Sep 07
so what? better to have someone you can trust. The usual fare from Paul Hutcheon.
so what? better to have someone you can trust. The usual fare from Paul Hutcheon.
Posted by: Plobotsky on 10:32pm Sat 22 Sep 07
Should the Tax Payers' Alliance not be getting its own column? I think it is lazy journalism to go for a reaction from a body whose views can be wholly predicted.
For myself, I think it is entirely reasonable for elected members to appoint familiy members and associates to these jobs. I agree with Margo MacDonald on this point.
I don't think it's fair, it offends against principles of equality of opportunity, and it also perpetuates political dynasties. But you just have to look at cases where political assistants have turned on their employers over some dispute, to see why MPs and MSPs need to give these jobs to people they feel they can completely trust.
Should the Tax Payers' Alliance not be getting its own column? I think it is lazy journalism to go for a reaction from a body whose views can be wholly predicted.
For myself, I think it is entirely reasonable for elected members to appoint familiy members and associates to these jobs. I agree with Margo MacDonald on this point.
I don't think it's fair, it offends against principles of equality of opportunity, and it also perpetuates political dynasties. But you just have to look at cases where political assistants have turned on their employers over some dispute, to see why MPs and MSPs need to give these jobs to people they feel they can completely trust.
Posted by: Pete, Glasgow on 11:13pm Sat 22 Sep 07
What's wrong with this is that it is not equal opportunity. Any other publicly funded posts (and many private or vol org) would be signed up to equal opps - the best candidate gets the job. Why should MSPs be any different? Particulary so when they are in a privileged position and are supposed to be setting an example?
What's wrong with this is that it is not equal opportunity. Any other publicly funded posts (and many private or vol org) would be signed up to equal opps - the best candidate gets the job. Why should MSPs be any different? Particulary so when they are in a privileged position and are supposed to be setting an example?
Posted by: Maria Regina on 11:34pm Sat 22 Sep 07
It is disappointing to see so many SNPers engaged in what I had assumed was New Labour corrupt practises. Not only is it against the principle of equal opportunities there must be a suspicion that this is merely a way of giving your old mum a bit of a bung and that there is precious little work done in return (are you really going to give you mum or your husband a written warning if they pull a few fake “sickies”?). It is a way for our corrupt politicians to transfer public money to their own families pockets.
It is disappointing to see so many SNPers engaged in what I had assumed was New Labour corrupt practises. Not only is it against the principle of equal opportunities there must be a suspicion that this is merely a way of giving your old mum a bit of a bung and that there is precious little work done in return (are you really going to give you mum or your husband a written warning if they pull a few fake “sickies”?). It is a way for our corrupt politicians to transfer public money to their own families pockets.
Posted by: Guga, Rockall on 1:10am Sun 23 Sep 07
Employing their friends, relations, or the relations of other MSP's is [bold]nepotism[/bold] , plain and simple, and should not be allowed. It may not be considered, legally, as a corrupt practice, but it most certainly is.
Not only is this preventing ordinary people from having the opportunity to apply for positions, but it is merely a method of allowing MSP's to get not only their snouts in the trough, but the snouts of their family and friends.
Not only does the nepotism have to stop, but there should be a thorough investigation of all the allowances paid to MSP's. Moreover, any allowances should be taxable.
Let's finally get rid of all of the New Labour and Tory corrupt practices.
Employing their friends, relations, or the relations of other MSP's is
nepotism , plain and simple, and should not be allowed. It may not be considered, legally, as a corrupt practice, but it most certainly is.
Not only is this preventing ordinary people from having the opportunity to apply for positions, but it is merely a method of allowing MSP's to get not only their snouts in the trough, but the snouts of their family and friends.
Not only does the nepotism have to stop, but there should be a thorough investigation of all the allowances paid to MSP's. Moreover, any allowances should be taxable.
Let's finally get rid of all of the New Labour and Tory corrupt practices.
Posted by: Jimbo on 1:34am Sun 23 Sep 07
I agree with Guga, regardless of party alliances. This to me is malpractice and unethical.
No doubt there are MSPs in all parties who are in the job because they actually care but there are also many in all parties who are in it for what they can get out of it.
I agree with Guga, regardless of party alliances. This to me is malpractice and unethical.
No doubt there are MSPs in all parties who are in the job because they actually care but there are also many in all parties who are in it for what they can get out of it.
Posted by: Who gives a...., Glasgow on 1:45am Sun 23 Sep 07
I am disappointed to read this, but mostly surprised at the some of the names that are involved in this despicable practice.
Its what I have experienced overseas. This is just like most Banana republics or African states. Its like Zimbabwe.
Nepotism does not discriminate, it usually elevates the family members to positions and incomes to which they are neither experienced or qualified, able to warrant or justify the income they receive.
Observations have shown they are most often the least employable members of the family.
Unless the family member can demonstrate having satisfactorily filled a similar or more senior position for a suitable period of time, this is Plain and simple CORRUPTION.
Good article Sunday Herald, name and shame. I hope this does not fade away until the right thing is done.
I am disappointed to read this, but mostly surprised at the some of the names that are involved in this despicable practice.
Its what I have experienced overseas. This is just like most Banana republics or African states. Its like Zimbabwe.
Nepotism does not discriminate, it usually elevates the family members to positions and incomes to which they are neither experienced or qualified, able to warrant or justify the income they receive.
Observations have shown they are most often the least employable members of the family.
Unless the family member can demonstrate having satisfactorily filled a similar or more senior position for a suitable period of time, this is Plain and simple CORRUPTION.
Good article Sunday Herald, name and shame. I hope this does not fade away until the right thing is done.
Posted by: Stevie, Bo'ness on 2:50am Sun 23 Sep 07
I dont think there's much in this to be honest. Politics tends to run in families, and loyalty is obviously an important issue. These are [bold]personal[/bold] staff after all, not council or parliamentary staff. Storm in a tea cup.
I dont think there's much in this to be honest. Politics tends to run in families, and loyalty is obviously an important issue. These are
personal staff after all, not council or parliamentary staff. Storm in a tea cup.
Posted by: Heederum - Hoderum, HIGH HORSE on 7:19am Sun 23 Sep 07
[quote][bold]Maria Regina[/bold] wrote:
It is disappointing to see so many SNPers engaged in what I had assumed was New Labour corrupt practises. Not only is it against the principle of equal opportunities there must be a suspicion that this is merely a way of giving your old mum a bit of a bung and that there is precious little work done in return (are you really going to give you mum or your husband a written warning if they pull a few fake “sickies”?). It is a way for our corrupt politicians to transfer public money to their own families pockets.[/quote] MARIA REGINA
I suspect that in order to develop lots of businesses, family members supply masses of unpaid assistance and if the rules permit such payments to committed people in the work of the MSP then what is the problem.As long as the payments are transparent and the public and the public purse aren't being misused, I don't see this as a problem.......and anyway.....who in the world is LESS likely to "pull a sickie" if it had even the merest hint of being harmful to you.
Maria Regina wrote:
It is disappointing to see so many SNPers engaged in what I had assumed was New Labour corrupt practises. Not only is it against the principle of equal opportunities there must be a suspicion that this is merely a way of giving your old mum a bit of a bung and that there is precious little work done in return (are you really going to give you mum or your husband a written warning if they pull a few fake “sickies”?). It is a way for our corrupt politicians to transfer public money to their own families pockets.
MARIA REGINA
I suspect that in order to develop lots of businesses, family members supply masses of unpaid assistance and if the rules permit such payments to committed people in the work of the MSP then what is the problem.As long as the payments are transparent and the public and the public purse aren't being misused, I don't see this as a problem.......and anyway.....who in the world is LESS likely to "pull a sickie" if it had even the merest hint of being harmful to you.
Posted by: donald, glasgow on 8:04am Sun 23 Sep 07
At the time of the SSP split it was greed that Tommy's personal Secretary, Felicity Garvie, could not remain in that post since she favoured the other side of the split. This did not reflect on her competence and integrity. (I happen to be friendly with both, so stirrers leaver it out please).
Having someone you can trust in such a sensitive position is a far cry from the numpty nepotism of generations of Labour Cooncils and public bodies. Labour are daft enogh to point the finger for the sake of an anti SNP knee jerk reaction and pulling their own house down in the process.
At the time of the SSP split it was greed that Tommy's personal Secretary, Felicity Garvie, could not remain in that post since she favoured the other side of the split. This did not reflect on her competence and integrity. (I happen to be friendly with both, so stirrers leaver it out please).
Having someone you can trust in such a sensitive position is a far cry from the numpty nepotism of generations of Labour Cooncils and public bodies. Labour are daft enogh to point the finger for the sake of an anti SNP knee jerk reaction and pulling their own house down in the process.
Posted by: Cynica on 8:49am Sun 23 Sep 07
Surely the bottom line is that whoever is appointed has the skills neccessary to do the job.
Otherweise it becomes a sinecure.
Surely the bottom line is that whoever is appointed has the skills neccessary to do the job.
Otherweise it becomes a sinecure.
Posted by: Nepotism and noses in troughs on 9:42am Sun 23 Sep 07
Noses in troughs indeed. No wonder the public detest these people.
Noses in troughs indeed. No wonder the public detest these people.
Posted by: Bankie, Clydebank on 10:41am Sun 23 Sep 07
Surely if the relatives or other persons are interviewed by independent panel of interviewers ( and...who haven't been 'tapped'),and there qualifications are appropriate there can be no nepotism allegations made.
Surely if the relatives or other persons are interviewed by independent panel of interviewers ( and...who haven't been 'tapped'),and there qualifications are appropriate there can be no nepotism allegations made.
Posted by: BM, Glasgow on 10:52am Sun 23 Sep 07
Holyrood did not take long to learn how to imitate Westminster sleaze! However sleaze and corruption have been the trademark of the Labour Party in Scotland for as long as I can remember, and beyond that. Jobs and for relatives and party members has always been a long and indisputable tradition in Labour controlled Scottish Councils. The People's Party descended into nepotism and corruption within a very few years of its actual founding.
Holyrood did not take long to learn how to imitate Westminster sleaze! However sleaze and corruption have been the trademark of the Labour Party in Scotland for as long as I can remember, and beyond that. Jobs and for relatives and party members has always been a long and indisputable tradition in Labour controlled Scottish Councils. The People's Party descended into nepotism and corruption within a very few years of its actual founding.
Posted by: mac the knife, glasgow on 11:01am Sun 23 Sep 07
Paul Hutcheon prowls the corridors of power in Holyrood with his distinctive, if rather shaddy, old man's Mac... Having crafted himself on Columbo, the look doesn't quite fit the investigative prowess of his hero and so time and again he blunders from one untruth to the next, making one false assumption after another without the slightest hint of shame. Mind you hats off to him, who else could get away with writing 500 words of drivel a week and get paid £89,000 a year... which would be fine if he was writing a serial novel, but not when its meant to be a serious factual newspaper. I dont think he would last long as a proper journalist though, which is why he has stuck where he is of course. If MSPs are corrupt lets see some proper evidence instead of unfounded inference and the nudge and a wink style of "reporting" which so characterises Hutcheons doodlings.
Paul Hutcheon prowls the corridors of power in Holyrood with his distinctive, if rather shaddy, old man's Mac... Having crafted himself on Columbo, the look doesn't quite fit the investigative prowess of his hero and so time and again he blunders from one untruth to the next, making one false assumption after another without the slightest hint of shame. Mind you hats off to him, who else could get away with writing 500 words of drivel a week and get paid £89,000 a year... which would be fine if he was writing a serial novel, but not when its meant to be a serious factual newspaper. I dont think he would last long as a proper journalist though, which is why he has stuck where he is of course. If MSPs are corrupt lets see some proper evidence instead of unfounded inference and the nudge and a wink style of "reporting" which so characterises Hutcheons doodlings.
Posted by: Paul on 11:19am Sun 23 Sep 07
Does the author write "drivel"?
Are we looking at an ad hominem attack again? The public "mac" are fed up with such immature idiocy. Its too easy to see through.
The MSPs, in general, ARE employing their family and cronies. Are you saying that is not true?
AND, in so doing, they undermine the credibility of the Parliament AND the people who work in it.
Nobody will take them serious. People will simply ask "who are they related to"? They are hardly getting the job through ability eh?
People also know the connection to the media and business. I see that John Smith's daughter is doing great in the TV media.
I see that Donalds poodle has taken over New Labour in Holyrood.
What about Kirsty Wark and her connections to Jack Lad? And her husband who is a businessman. Getting any more nice contracts from Government?
Mac, stop telling people rubbish. People can see it. People deserve better mac, they really do.
Noses in troughs, nepotism, cronyism... it stinks and it slaps decent people in the face.
Mac, the ad hominem muck looks pathetic and is so EASY to see through.
BUT you mention big shot journalists. Yes, they are in the elitist loop as well. We all know that. Yes they will creep around kissing bum and showing off and so on. Its vomit inducing.
Does the author write "drivel"?
Are we looking at an ad hominem attack again? The public "mac" are fed up with such immature idiocy. Its too easy to see through.
The MSPs, in general, ARE employing their family and cronies. Are you saying that is not true?
AND, in so doing, they undermine the credibility of the Parliament AND the people who work in it.
Nobody will take them serious. People will simply ask "who are they related to"? They are hardly getting the job through ability eh?
People also know the connection to the media and business. I see that John Smith's daughter is doing great in the TV media.
I see that Donalds poodle has taken over New Labour in Holyrood.
What about Kirsty Wark and her connections to Jack Lad? And her husband who is a businessman. Getting any more nice contracts from Government?
Mac, stop telling people rubbish. People can see it. People deserve better mac, they really do.
Noses in troughs, nepotism, cronyism... it stinks and it slaps decent people in the face.
Mac, the ad hominem muck looks pathetic and is so EASY to see through.
BUT you mention big shot journalists. Yes, they are in the elitist loop as well. We all know that. Yes they will creep around kissing bum and showing off and so on. Its vomit inducing.
Posted by: Tony Grahame, Edinburgh on 12:08pm Sun 23 Sep 07
I am mentioned incorrectly in the article as currently working for my sister. This is not true - I did a [bold]few days temping[/bold] for her early this year as a favour when she was moving office and her full time staff member was on leave. It is difficult for a MSP to find temporary staff who can work at short notice and be known to be trusted on confidential constituent matters and know the systems. It would have been easy for the journalist to check this - but he didn't. It's a shame because this kind of poor quality reporting reflects badly on an otherwise very good newspaper.
I am mentioned incorrectly in the article as currently working for my sister. This is not true - I did a
few days temping for her early this year as a favour when she was moving office and her full time staff member was on leave. It is difficult for a MSP to find temporary staff who can work at short notice and be known to be trusted on confidential constituent matters and know the systems. It would have been easy for the journalist to check this - but he didn't. It's a shame because this kind of poor quality reporting reflects badly on an otherwise very good newspaper.
Posted by: 238-498, borders on 1:22pm Sun 23 Sep 07
I don't agree, Tony. Why shouldn't MSPs hire people through an open process? Why should they be different?
I don't agree, Tony. Why shouldn't MSPs hire people through an open process? Why should they be different?
Posted by: Tony Grahame, Edinburgh on 3:11pm Sun 23 Sep 07
Regarding 238-498 above
I again repeat. The article in the herald is wrong and inaccurate and the facts would only have taken a minute to check. I do hope there will be an apology and retraction. You can see from comments that people assume what they have read is correct and then make other assumptions as 238-498 has done. There are a lot of good articles in today's Sunday Herald. It is a shame that it is let down in this way.
Regarding 238-498 above
I again repeat. The article in the herald is wrong and inaccurate and the facts would only have taken a minute to check. I do hope there will be an apology and retraction. You can see from comments that people assume what they have read is correct and then make other assumptions as 238-498 has done. There are a lot of good articles in today's Sunday Herald. It is a shame that it is let down in this way.
Posted by: Armin Cranford, Berlin on 3:20pm Sun 23 Sep 07
What an outrage! How many of the rest of us would get away with employing our family members? Contrary to some comments above, I think this is great journalism, showing us that our tax money is being spent on what is at best a highly questionable practice that should be barred under the parliamentary system. Sadly typical Holyrood. I'd leave the country if I hadn't already.
What an outrage! How many of the rest of us would get away with employing our family members? Contrary to some comments above, I think this is great journalism, showing us that our tax money is being spent on what is at best a highly questionable practice that should be barred under the parliamentary system. Sadly typical Holyrood. I'd leave the country if I hadn't already.
Posted by: DouglasB, Cambuslang on 6:29pm Sun 23 Sep 07
Surely there is nothing wrong with MSP's employing their own families or friends to help you, they can be trusted in this situation.
The problems of nepotism in local government is a serious and separate pronlem and needs to be addressed separately. Most small traders employ family members, they could also be accused of nepotsim, but just try and do so,there would get a big outcry from them and quite right too.
Surely there is nothing wrong with MSP's employing their own families or friends to help you, they can be trusted in this situation.
The problems of nepotism in local government is a serious and separate pronlem and needs to be addressed separately. Most small traders employ family members, they could also be accused of nepotsim, but just try and do so,there would get a big outcry from them and quite right too.
Posted by: fdr, NYC on 6:48pm Sun 23 Sep 07
no way, it's just an excuse to top up the family income. These jobs should be advertised and filled in the proper way. No exceptions.
I hear what Tony Grahame is saying, but it still looks bad if MSPs employ their family - past or present,
no way, it's just an excuse to top up the family income. These jobs should be advertised and filled in the proper way. No exceptions.
I hear what Tony Grahame is saying, but it still looks bad if MSPs employ their family - past or present,
Posted by: Andrew Kidd, Glasgow on 7:47pm Sun 23 Sep 07
Interesting to see that there was no mention of the amounts paid to these staff.
No doubt because it would undermine Mr Hutheon's agenda.
These are not well paid posts for what is involved in the job.
It requires a high level of confidentiality and requires the employee to work unsupervised a lot of the time. If they were paid at commercial rates it would cost the taxpayer a lot more as family members will go "the extra mile".
Do those who call for the posts to be advertised realise how much recruitment advertising costs?
There would also be increased costs of compliance with employment laws, increased staff turnover etc.
Interesting to see that there was no mention of the amounts paid to these staff.
No doubt because it would undermine Mr Hutheon's agenda.
These are not well paid posts for what is involved in the job.
It requires a high level of confidentiality and requires the employee to work unsupervised a lot of the time. If they were paid at commercial rates it would cost the taxpayer a lot more as family members will go "the extra mile".
Do those who call for the posts to be advertised realise how much recruitment advertising costs?
There would also be increased costs of compliance with employment laws, increased staff turnover etc.
Posted by: Alasdair Glen on 8:03pm Sun 23 Sep 07
Just a quick note to say that I am the above named Alasdair Glen, and when I worked for my mother, Marlyn Glen MSP, it was in a unpaid, volutary capacity. I don't wish to enter into a debate about the ethics of paying your family to work for you, just to say that if the research that went into my mention in this article is indicative of its level of journalism as a whole, you'd be better disregarding it in its entirety.
Just a quick note to say that I am the above named Alasdair Glen, and when I worked for my mother, Marlyn Glen MSP, it was in a unpaid, volutary capacity. I don't wish to enter into a debate about the ethics of paying your family to work for you, just to say that if the research that went into my mention in this article is indicative of its level of journalism as a whole, you'd be better disregarding it in its entirety.
Posted by: wee hughie on 12:26am Mon 24 Sep 07
Mr Hutchin's 'investigation' amounted to one short letter to the Parliament as a Freedom of Information request-I-John Pilger he ain't!!! Back to the parliament in-house magazine unless you can do better than this Paul. Also, MSPs do not have £50k "for staffing cost" as he well knows, but never let truth get in the way of a not very good story eh?
Mr Hutchin's 'investigation' amounted to one short letter to the Parliament as a Freedom of Information request-I-John Pilger he ain't!!! Back to the parliament in-house magazine unless you can do better than this Paul. Also, MSPs do not have £50k "for staffing cost" as he well knows, but never let truth get in the way of a not very good story eh?
Posted by: Jim Silvey, Dundee on 1:25pm Tue 25 Sep 07
This is all very well, but one wonders when Mr Hutcheon, (who is, I understand your "political Editor") is going to start writing about the actual politics in Scotland instead of this rather gutter style of reporting. Frankly I couldn't care less if they were employing Britney Speirs, so long as services and investment in health and infrastructure were improved. I get the uncomfortable sense however Mr Hutcheon is following a personal vendetta. If only politicians were as squeaky clean as our journalistic sector !!
This is all very well, but one wonders when Mr Hutcheon, (who is, I understand your "political Editor") is going to start writing about the actual politics in Scotland instead of this rather gutter style of reporting. Frankly I couldn't care less if they were employing Britney Speirs, so long as services and investment in health and infrastructure were improved. I get the uncomfortable sense however Mr Hutcheon is following a personal vendetta. If only politicians were as squeaky clean as our journalistic sector !!
Posted by: Ross Ingebrigtsen, Edinburgh on 6:20pm Tue 25 Sep 07
now let me tell you all something. I'm an assistant to an MSP (who I won't name). I work full time, and I'm paid £15,000 a year. I am a graduate, and I know for a fact that most other assistants earn about the same. Do you all think this is a reasonable wage? Do you think we couldn't earn more in the private sector? The MSPs simply can't afford to pay any more because, if they ask for an increase in their allowance to give staff better wages, the press kick up a stink about it and talk about 'corrupt politicians lining their pockets', so none of us can complain about it. It's true that many MSPs employ their own staff, but do you think the staff somehow don't work for their money just because they're related? It's always in the MSPs interests to have hardworking staff. There is absolutely no benefit to the MSPs if they get an increase in their Member's Allowances. The beneficiaries are their under-paid staff, who, as this pathetic article demonstrates, apparently have no right to expect a decent pay.
now let me tell you all something. I'm an assistant to an MSP (who I won't name). I work full time, and I'm paid £15,000 a year. I am a graduate, and I know for a fact that most other assistants earn about the same. Do you all think this is a reasonable wage? Do you think we couldn't earn more in the private sector? The MSPs simply can't afford to pay any more because, if they ask for an increase in their allowance to give staff better wages, the press kick up a stink about it and talk about 'corrupt politicians lining their pockets', so none of us can complain about it. It's true that many MSPs employ their own staff, but do you think the staff somehow don't work for their money just because they're related? It's always in the MSPs interests to have hardworking staff. There is absolutely no benefit to the MSPs if they get an increase in their Member's Allowances. The beneficiaries are their under-paid staff, who, as this pathetic article demonstrates, apparently have no right to expect a decent pay.
Posted by: Robby, EDINBURGH on 2:17pm Wed 26 Sep 07
MSP Assistant Required
The successful applicant will be educated to degree level in a relevant subject. They will be committed to working long and erratic hours to ensure the progress of their employer’s party and will be a close personal ally of the employing MSP. It is very likely they will have demonstrated this through years of voluntary work for the Party. They will be experienced and politically savvy.
Duties will include drafting speeches, articles, parliamentary questions and motions. Writing and issuing press releases. Conducting research, providing briefing documents, diary management, dealing with members of the media and the public, constituency casework research and whatever else life throws at you.
Salary: circa £15,000
How many qualified people can you imagine applying for it?
Increasing MSPs allowances to pay their staff a competitive wage is likely to mean they’ll be able to employ people who aren’t willing to put up with the salary purely out of love for the MSP
MSP Assistant Required
The successful applicant will be educated to degree level in a relevant subject. They will be committed to working long and erratic hours to ensure the progress of their employer’s party and will be a close personal ally of the employing MSP. It is very likely they will have demonstrated this through years of voluntary work for the Party. They will be experienced and politically savvy.
Duties will include drafting speeches, articles, parliamentary questions and motions. Writing and issuing press releases. Conducting research, providing briefing documents, diary management, dealing with members of the media and the public, constituency casework research and whatever else life throws at you.
Salary: circa £15,000
How many qualified people can you imagine applying for it?
Increasing MSPs allowances to pay their staff a competitive wage is likely to mean they’ll be able to employ people who aren’t willing to put up with the salary purely out of love for the MSP
Posted by: Debbs, Edinburgh on 1:54pm Mon 29 Oct 07
[quote][bold]Ross Ingebrigtsen[/bold] wrote:
now let me tell you all something. I\'m an assistant to an MSP (who I won\'t name). I work full time, and I\'m paid £15,000 a year. I am a graduate, and I know for a fact that most other assistants earn about the same. Do you all think this is a reasonable wage? Do you think we couldn\'t earn more in the private sector? The MSPs simply can\'t afford to pay any more because, if they ask for an increase in their allowance to give staff better wages, the press kick up a stink about it and talk about \'corrupt politicians lining their pockets\', so none of us can complain about it. It\'s true that many MSPs employ their own staff, but do you think the staff somehow don\'t work for their money just because they\'re related? It\'s always in the MSPs interests to have hardworking staff. There is absolutely no benefit to the MSPs if they get an increase in their Member\'s Allowances. The beneficiaries are their under-paid staff, who, as this pathetic article demonstrates, apparently have no right to expect a decent pay.[/quote] So that'll be Alex Neil then?
Ross Ingebrigtsen wrote:
now let me tell you all something. I\'m an assistant to an MSP (who I won\'t name). I work full time, and I\'m paid £15,000 a year. I am a graduate, and I know for a fact that most other assistants earn about the same. Do you all think this is a reasonable wage? Do you think we couldn\'t earn more in the private sector? The MSPs simply can\'t afford to pay any more because, if they ask for an increase in their allowance to give staff better wages, the press kick up a stink about it and talk about \'corrupt politicians lining their pockets\', so none of us can complain about it. It\'s true that many MSPs employ their own staff, but do you think the staff somehow don\'t work for their money just because they\'re related? It\'s always in the MSPs interests to have hardworking staff. There is absolutely no benefit to the MSPs if they get an increase in their Member\'s Allowances. The beneficiaries are their under-paid staff, who, as this pathetic article demonstrates, apparently have no right to expect a decent pay.
So that'll be Alex Neil then?
Posted by: Watching&Waiting, Glasgow on 6:51pm Thu 29 Nov 07
The point here is that there is no way of knowing whether the family members employed were the best candidates for the job, and until evidence comes to light that shows otherwise, we can only assume (or indeed hope) that they are.
[italic]However[/italic] , there are instances far closer to home of the best candidate (and indeed the chosen candidate) for a job being deliberately usurped in favour of the family member of an elected councillor.....stand up and take a bow Glasgow City Council. You know who you are.
The point here is that there is no way of knowing whether the family members employed were the best candidates for the job, and until evidence comes to light that shows otherwise, we can only assume (or indeed hope) that they are.
However , there are instances far closer to home of the best candidate (and indeed the chosen candidate) for a job being deliberately usurped in favour of the family member of an elected councillor.....stand up and take a bow Glasgow City Council. You know who you are.