10,000 historic sites at risk from climate change
Exclusive: Experts warn of 'incalculable loss' MORE THAN 10,000 of the most important ancient and historical sites around Scotland's coastline are at risk of being destroyed by the storms and rising sea levels that will come with global warming.
Sites in jeopardy include the neolithic settlement of Skara Brae on Orkney and the prehistoric ruins at Jarlshof on Shetland. Others under threat range from Viking burial boats to Iron Age brochs and Mesolithic middens.
New surveys for Historic Scotland reveal that the remains of communities up to 9000 years old could be lost for ever due to accelerating coastal erosion.
The potential loss is incalculable and has alarmed experts. "This is a uniquely valuable and totally irreplaceable part of the nation's cultural heritage, with much still to teach us about our past," said Tom Dawson, an archaeologist at the University of St Andrews.
"While people argue over whether
climate change is leading to sea level rise and an increase in stormy weather, the coast continues to erode. Although wildlife and the natural habitat may be
able to recover, ancient sites will be destroyed forever, and the remnants of our ancestors will be lost."
Dawson manages a group called Scottish Coastal Archaeology and the Problem of Erosion (Scape), which was set up in 2001 to protect ancient shoreline sites. With the help of local Shorewatch' groups across the country, Scape has been investigating the status of the sites.
So far some 30% of Scotland's coastline has been surveyed, discovering 11,500 archaeological sites of which 3500 are judged to be at risk of erosion. According to Dawson, that suggests that more than 10,000 sites around the whole coast are likely to be at risk.
The results of the surveys have been summarised in a report by Scape to Historic Scotland, which has not yet been published. But Dawson is due to unveil his findings at a major conference on climate change and the historic environment in Stirling on Tuesday.
Many of the archaeological sites are concentrated on Orkney, Shetland, the Western Isles and parts of the west coast, which are known to be particularly vulnerable to storms.
Others can be found around all the major estuaries, including the Clyde and the Forth.
Many sites have yet to be excavated and properly studied. Others are iconic and well-known remains defended by old and eroding seawalls, such as Skara Brae, Jarlshof, the Broch of Gurness on Orkney and Lochranza Castle on the Isle of Arran.
Dawson accepted that it would be impossible to save all the sites. But he stressed how important it was to try to map, study and preserve as many as possible in order of priority.
"It is not all doom and gloom," he said. "By working together, we can rescue information and artefacts from some of the sites before they are destroyed."
A recent example of the damage that can be inflicted by extreme weather was the fierce storm that whipped the Western Isles in January 2005, which tragically claimed the lives of five people from one family when they attempted to drive across a causeway near their home on South Uist.
According to Dawson, the storm washed away up to 20 metres of the coastline in some places. At Baile Sear beach, on the west coast of North Uist, a car park and a picnic area disappeared, leaving a track ending abruptly on the shoreline.
The storm also uncovered a mass of archaeological remains at Baile Sear, including pottery, animal bones, slabs of masonry and an ancient waste dump. In order to try to record what has been revealed before it vanishes in another storm, archaeologists and volunteers have been working extensively there this summer.
Teams discovered two buildings, a structure containing several small rooms and a remarkably preserved Iron Age wheelhouse, probably built around 2000 years ago.
They also found that, since the 2005 storm, the beach had retreated by five metres and walls had shrunk by up to a metre in height.
Elsewhere, a Shorewatch group has been drawing and photographing the remains of a Pictish building which is being eroded at Sandwick on Unst in Shetland. There are plans for another "adopt-a-monument" team to excavate an ancient Bronze Age structure at risk from the sea on the island of Bressay in Shetland.
Tuesday's conference on climate change is being organised by the Historic Environment Advisory Council for Scotland (HEACS), which advises ministers. It will hear evidence of the widespread dangers posed by worsening weather. "Archaeological sites, ancient monuments and historic buildings are all threatened by climate change," said HEACS secretary, Olwyn Owen. "But they also have much to teach us. This is not the first time that Scotland's inhabitants have had to adapt to change."
A recent study of Brodick Castle on Arran by the Centre for Sustainable Heritage at University College London found that its walls were being penetrated and damaged by driving rain. The problem was partly due to inadequate guttering.
Mike Corfield, the former chief scientist of English Heritage, argued that penetrating rain and other threats were going to get worse with global warming. "I personally think that this is a very serious problem that we are going to have to address," he told the Sunday Herald.
As well as the risks to coastal sites and historic buildings, Corfield was worried about valuable artefacts buried underground. Alterations in the chemistry of the soil triggered by climate change could accelerate corrosion, he suggested.
Ingvar Maxwell, director of technical conservation with Historic Scotland, agreed that climate change was a potential threat. "Water is well recognised as the engine of decay," he said.
There were half a million houses in Scotland built before 1919, he pointed out, many from sandstone which is particularly vulnerable to damage from moisture penetration. The country also has more than 47,000 listed buildings and 8000 scheduled ancient monuments.
Maxwell has a team investigating whether climate change will accelerate the decay process. "We are talking about possible impacts on all building materials and on all Scotland's built heritage," he said.
|
|

Posted by: G Gardner, Edinburgh on 1:41am Sun 23 Sep 07
How odd to single out Skara Brae for a particular mention .
This site was surely abandoned because of climatic factors.It was buried under sand by climatic action .
It was exposed during a great storm.
So climatic factors will adversely affect it in the future.
Are we supposed to be surprised?
How odd to single out Skara Brae for a particular mention .
This site was surely abandoned because of climatic factors.It was buried under sand by climatic action .
It was exposed during a great storm.
So climatic factors will adversely affect it in the future.
Are we supposed to be surprised?
Posted by: Abdul Akbar, Bangla Desh on 8:03am Sun 23 Sep 07
[bold]Still more claptrap on the climate change fraud[/bold] .
Still more claptrap on the climate change fraud .
Posted by: Anders Nogiets, Zuid-Holland on 8:17am Sun 23 Sep 07
"the storms and rising sea levels that will come with global warming" - more drivel from the AGW "scientists". The ice started retreating from Scotland around 11,000 years ago and the climate has been warming ever since. Back then, the sea level was 120 metres lower and England was connected to "mainland" Europe. Owing to the reduced pressure of ice on the land, Scotland is still rising out of the sea.
Speaking from way below sea level here in the Netherlands,
Anders
"the storms and rising sea levels that will come with global warming" - more drivel from the AGW "scientists". The ice started retreating from Scotland around 11,000 years ago and the climate has been warming ever since. Back then, the sea level was 120 metres lower and England was connected to "mainland" Europe. Owing to the reduced pressure of ice on the land, Scotland is still rising out of the sea.
Speaking from way below sea level here in the Netherlands,
Anders
Posted by: Umbeababe on 9:20am Sun 23 Sep 07
Experts warn of incalcuble loss; but how could you lose if everything on earth is borrowed.
It is far worse to see the earth being destroyed by humans than by natural forces.
I've seen in my life how golden beaches were turned into black mud by the people of the land.
We should better focus on the future than hang on to the past, and on ourselves to accept and respect nature's ways.
The earth itself has taken on its shape through climatic changes, so why should we be alarmed and lament about it any longer.
Try to see things form a new and fresh perspective than dwell on the antiquities of what lies behind us. It's gone and away.
Experts warn of incalcuble loss; but how could you lose if everything on earth is borrowed.
It is far worse to see the earth being destroyed by humans than by natural forces.
I've seen in my life how golden beaches were turned into black mud by the people of the land.
We should better focus on the future than hang on to the past, and on ourselves to accept and respect nature's ways.
The earth itself has taken on its shape through climatic changes, so why should we be alarmed and lament about it any longer.
Try to see things form a new and fresh perspective than dwell on the antiquities of what lies behind us. It's gone and away.
Posted by: Mick, Glasgow on 10:35am Sun 23 Sep 07
Yes I agree with everything that has been written thus far by my druidic brothers and sisters. It is true that once this land was covered with ice and Scotland did survive. I too curse "the people of the land" , they are almost as bad as those land dwellers who believe that science should be used to thwart diseases, diseases hast shaped our populations for ages so let us die appropriately. Let us not dwell on the antiquities for what good do they do us rather than contain valuable art and knowledge (the worst of the land dwellers excesses) and of course they encourage tourists with billions of pounds of spending money, we do not want such "air travellers" landing on our motherland. I do applaud Abdul in Bangladesh for his wise words on climate change, for that great country will never suffer from that. And I also say thank goodness yet another person has ended a comment with the phrase "should we be surprised?" surely one of the most popular endnotes in these forums. It is a brilliant way of being smug and ignorant all at the same time. "Should we be surprised?" no we shouldn't but hey perhaps we are better informed. Farewell earth-dwellers I go off to greet oblivion with you. Idiots.
Yes I agree with everything that has been written thus far by my druidic brothers and sisters. It is true that once this land was covered with ice and Scotland did survive. I too curse "the people of the land" , they are almost as bad as those land dwellers who believe that science should be used to thwart diseases, diseases hast shaped our populations for ages so let us die appropriately. Let us not dwell on the antiquities for what good do they do us rather than contain valuable art and knowledge (the worst of the land dwellers excesses) and of course they encourage tourists with billions of pounds of spending money, we do not want such "air travellers" landing on our motherland. I do applaud Abdul in Bangladesh for his wise words on climate change, for that great country will never suffer from that. And I also say thank goodness yet another person has ended a comment with the phrase "should we be surprised?" surely one of the most popular endnotes in these forums. It is a brilliant way of being smug and ignorant all at the same time. "Should we be surprised?" no we shouldn't but hey perhaps we are better informed. Farewell earth-dwellers I go off to greet oblivion with you. Idiots.
Posted by: Albert, Glasgow on 11:14am Sun 23 Sep 07
Others can be found around all the major [bold]estuaries[/bold] , including the Clyde and the Forth.
Well our language has been eroded (why not firths?) so what makes heaps of stones more special?
Others can be found around all the major
estuaries , including the Clyde and the Forth.
Well our language has been eroded (why not firths?) so what makes heaps of stones more special?
Posted by: Dougie Douglas, Brisbane on 11:43am Sun 23 Sep 07
Historic sites being lost will be the absolute least of our worries if this sea level rise happens - #2 and 150M of his compatriots will be knocking on the door for starters.
Historic sites being lost will be the absolute least of our worries if this sea level rise happens - #2 and 150M of his compatriots will be knocking on the door for starters.
Posted by: Diego, East of Eden on 1:30pm Sun 23 Sep 07
When it's incalculable (try typing this word without getting confused) you cannot book it either. There's enough stuff in the museums, more than you have time for to see.
When it's incalculable (try typing this word without getting confused) you cannot book it either. There's enough stuff in the museums, more than you have time for to see.
Posted by: M Lyons, edinburgh on 3:06pm Sun 23 Sep 07
What is Edwards trying to say here? CO2 emissions from electricity generation rose by 30% between 2005 and 2006 entirely as a result of the neglect of our nuclear industry. Edwards has been the leading proponent of killing it off for the last 30 years and now we are reaping the consequences. He is the biggest culprit by far in Scotland's increasingcontributi
on to global warming.
What is Edwards trying to say here? CO2 emissions from electricity generation rose by 30% between 2005 and 2006 entirely as a result of the neglect of our nuclear industry. Edwards has been the leading proponent of killing it off for the last 30 years and now we are reaping the consequences. He is the biggest culprit by far in Scotland's increasingcontributi
on to global warming.
Posted by: charlie, Uphill in Lanarkshire on 4:54pm Sun 23 Sep 07
what price these new developments along Glasgow's Pacific Quay, Edinburgh's Granton, Leith, et al? New concrete probably works under water...
what price these new developments along Glasgow's Pacific Quay, Edinburgh's Granton, Leith, et al? New concrete probably works under water...
Posted by: jimmy k on 4:59pm Sun 23 Sep 07
Edwards is a loon
first he just used to have off beat obscure scare stories around page 6 .. now he must be becoming a bit of a big gorilla in the Herald forest as whatever obscure conjecture he has makes a big story.... he would actually fir in better over at Scot on Sun they are all loons there :-)
Edwards is a loon
first he just used to have off beat obscure scare stories around page 6 .. now he must be becoming a bit of a big gorilla in the Herald forest as whatever obscure conjecture he has makes a big story.... he would actually fir in better over at Scot on Sun they are all loons there :-)
Posted by: Thomas Laprade, Thunder Bay on 6:22pm Sun 23 Sep 07
Dear Editor, Sept. 23/07
Recent research by Henrik Svensmark and his group at the Danish National
Space Center points to the real cause of the recent warming trend. In a
series of experiments on the formation of clouds, these scientists have
shown that fluctuations in the Sun's output cause the observed changes in the
Earth's temperature.
In the past, scientists believed the fluctuations in the Sun's output were
too small to cause the observed amount of temperature change, hence the need
to look for other causes like carbon dioxide. However, these new
experiments show that fluctuations in the Sun's output are in fact large
enough, so there is no longer a need to resort to carbon dioxide as the
cause of the recent warming trend.
The discovery of the real cause of the recent increase in the Earth's
temperature is indeed a convenient truth. It means humans are not to blame
for the increase. It also means there is absolutely nothing we can, much
less do, to correct the situation.
Thomas Laprade
480 Rupert St.
Thunder Bay, Ont.
Canada
Ph. 807 3457258
http://discovermagaz
ine.com/2007/jul/the
-discover-interview-
henrik-svensmark
http://environment.n
ewscientist.com/arti
cle.ns?id=dn11462
http://mypetjawa.mu.
nu/archives/188993.p
hp
Dear Editor, Sept. 23/07
Recent research by Henrik Svensmark and his group at the Danish National
Space Center points to the real cause of the recent warming trend. In a
series of experiments on the formation of clouds, these scientists have
shown that fluctuations in the Sun's output cause the observed changes in the
Earth's temperature.
In the past, scientists believed the fluctuations in the Sun's output were
too small to cause the observed amount of temperature change, hence the need
to look for other causes like carbon dioxide. However, these new
experiments show that fluctuations in the Sun's output are in fact large
enough, so there is no longer a need to resort to carbon dioxide as the
cause of the recent warming trend.
The discovery of the real cause of the recent increase in the Earth's
temperature is indeed a convenient truth. It means humans are not to blame
for the increase. It also means there is absolutely nothing we can, much
less do, to correct the situation.
Thomas Laprade
480 Rupert St.
Thunder Bay, Ont.
Canada
Ph. 807 3457258
http://discovermagaz
ine.com/2007/jul/the
-discover-interview-
henrik-svensmark
http://environment.n
ewscientist.com/arti
cle.ns?id=dn11462
http://mypetjawa.mu.
nu/archives/188993.p
hp
Posted by: mikiwud, Nuneaton on 8:34am Mon 24 Sep 07
Rob Edwards has an "exclusive" on drivel that has been dished out for nearly 20yrs.
The North is rising faster than the sea level.
Storms are formed due to the temperature differential between the tropics and the poles.As global warming is more pronounced at the poles,the differance should be less and the weather less severe.
Rob Edwards has an "exclusive" on drivel that has been dished out for nearly 20yrs.
The North is rising faster than the sea level.
Storms are formed due to the temperature differential between the tropics and the poles.As global warming is more pronounced at the poles,the differance should be less and the weather less severe.
Posted by: Hans Mayfield, USA on 3:26pm Mon 24 Sep 07
I agree with Albert. Many stone circles and other monuments are actually submerged or in shallow waters, including Seahenge. If global warming causes water to reach the henges, for the most part, it may not be tragic. But other ancient sites, such as burial mounds, are a different story.
http://euroheritage.
net
Intelligent discussion of European history, heritage, politics, religion, languages, and Islam in Europe.
I agree with Albert. Many stone circles and other monuments are actually submerged or in shallow waters, including Seahenge. If global warming causes water to reach the henges, for the most part, it may not be tragic. But other ancient sites, such as burial mounds, are a different story.
http://euroheritage.
net
Intelligent discussion of European history, heritage, politics, religion, languages, and Islam in Europe.
Posted by: Thomas Laprade, Thunder Nau, Ont. Canada on 6:46pm Wed 26 Sep 07
Global Warming!!
$125,000 thousand dollar reward to any person that can prove 'man' is the
cause of Global Warming
http://www.junkscien
ce.com/
Thomas Laprade
Thunder Bay, Ont.
Ph. 807 3457258
Global Warming!!
$125,000 thousand dollar reward to any person that can prove 'man' is the
cause of Global Warming
http://www.junkscien
ce.com/
Thomas Laprade
Thunder Bay, Ont.
Ph. 807 3457258