Home
July 20, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
‘Kiddyprinting’ takes off in Scots schools
The growth of biometrics

ALMOST HALF of all local authorities in Scotland have schools using fingerprint or palm-print machines to record the identity of pupils.

A Sunday Herald survey revealed the speed at which biometric systems have spread since a palmprint reader was piloted at a Paisley primary school just one year ago. Since then, 14 educational authorities have introduced biometric identification, with at least two others planning to put such systems in place.

The technology is currently used to record information about library accounts and register pupils' school meal status in the hope that anonymity will help tackle the stigma of free school dinners. Despite fears that such systems are eroding civil liberties by creating unnecessary banks of identity data, experts believe "kiddyprinting" will continue to expand in the near future.

Alan Cunningham, of Yarg Biometrics, the Scottish company which introduced palm-vein scanners in cafeterias, believes new projects could soon place biometric systems at the school gates.

He said: "It is possible to have a secure access system at the door that would register pupils, and could send an automatic text message to parents to let them know if children attended school that day."

Parents across the UK, concerned about such a future, have formed the campaign group Leave Them Kids Alone. Spokesman David Coulter said: "Schools are not the right place to hold this kind of sensitive data.

"There isn't sufficient protection in place. The (UK) government is failing in its duty to uphold children's rights, to protect their most precious commodity, their future identity."

The private firm Amey is now presenting biometric systems as part of its pitch for all new school building contracts. The company was keen to assure parents in Renfrewshire, where 11 more schools are set to adopt palm readers, that the technology was safe and data could not be stolen or misused.

Grant Henderson, Amey's director of education, said: "The parents of all children who use the palm-vein scanner are fully aware of the system and have given permission for the children to use them. This information is retained only on our local secure server and is not shared with any external bodies."

A Renfrewshire Council spokesman added: "The experience we've had so far has been positive, with support from staff, parents and pupils."

Coulter rejected the argument that data could not be compiled on any national database at a later date. "All these systems are potentially compatible. If someone has access to biometric data, we don't know how it could be used in 10 years' time."

Patrick Harvie MSP, who raised questions about the implications of school fingerprinting in the Scottish parliament last year, is concerned its rapid spread its sending the wrong message to young people.

"They could impinge directly on civil liberties, but in a wider sense, they seem to be preparing young people to surrender their biometric data. We should be teaching children to be very careful about protecting their identity."

The Green Party MSP also said previous proposals about the introduction of scanners, CCTV, compulsory ID cards and random drug testing in schools were a worrying indication of a shift in educational ethos. "It feels like an environment where pupils are being policed, rather than the nurturing, learning atmosphere we should be creating."

Amid concern that some schools had not properly consulted parents on finger and palmprinting, the information commissioner recently issued best-practice guidelines on gaining the consent of both young children and their parents. The Data Protection Act, however, does not prevent school fingerprinting without parental consent, and campaigners are angry that students over 12 are deemed mature enough to make up their own minds.

Yarg's Alan Cunningham said only appropriate biometric systems would be introduced in schools, but predicted a boom in the widespread use of the security scanning technology.

"Secure access is the biggest market for biometric systems. Down the line, in the next three to five years, biometrics will be used in bank cards. In the next five years, we'll see an explosion in where biometrics are used."

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Im not really here on 10:02pm Sat 6 Oct 07
"Bagged and Tagged" to feel more secure. Funny thing is, this makes me feel less secure.

Strange that you "can make up your own mind" to give your fingerprints at 12, but you need to be 18 to buy cigarettes or alcohol. Why does the Government put such a low age to allow you to give up your civil liberties.
Posted by: Vera Smart on 6:26am Sun 7 Oct 07
WELCOME TO CONDITIONING !

Get them when they are young and they won't notice they have have become 100% surveilled sheeple when they are older.

Any parent who allows this to happen to their child should be ashamed of themselves. They should be smashing the effing machines to bits and calling for the resignation of any headmater who allows these things into their schools.

And then there is function creep:
Coulter rejected the argument that data could not be compiled on any national database at a later date. "All these systems are potentially compatible. If someone has access to biometric data, we don't know how it could be used in 10 years' time ."
That doesn't mean it won't be. One can quite easily imagine the biometrics being used or accessed by police and the state long after the kids have left school, as well as while they are at it.


Posted by: Wullie, Scotland on 6:57am Sun 7 Oct 07
Scotland - the best wee surveilance country in the World.

Well not yet since we have not yet made it law to RFID chip the children at birth.

Nor have we made it mandatory yet to have everyones DNA recorded together with other key biometric identifiers such as fingerprints, iris idenificatin, or facial regognition measurement, but we are working at it and have made a good start. Its just the people don't fully understand how good and how neccessary all this state and big business suveilance this is.

But we can start young when they know no better and change opinions.

With all this surveilance technology Hitler's Third Reich could have lasted for a thousand years.

Seems he was just a few years to early.
Posted by: Shem, Australia on 12:02am Mon 8 Oct 07
Please note, in Australia we ewre guaranteed absolute security with our health card/id card.
The information which can be cross referenced was supposed to be inaccesable except by government departments. Supposedly just two departments had access, the tax boys and the health.
A bit later on after introductionof this fail safe secure system people discovered that just about every goevernment department had access to our "private" information. Now recently doctors inOz have been accessing this private
info and sending it overseas for cheap processing of their paperwork. I don't think that I would like some high position paedophile checking out the menu....how safe are your kids?????
Posted by: No Health Care For You, The Colonies on 11:40pm Thu 11 Oct 07
"I'm sorry Mr Jones, I see that as a youth you ate 25% more saturated fats and meats than recommended so we'll be unable to treat your high blood pressure. Additionally, since you appear to have skipped too many courses in nutritionetics, you're hereby directed to attend this course at your own expense or your employer will have to garnish your wages."
Think it can't happen? Just wait. Info is all the power gov't needs. No one realizes we are in a post-Orwellian era. They have plans for us for the next 100 yrs.
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login