Cracking the bottle scotland is gripped by a culture of excessive drinking. but can a new awareness campaign beat the booze? A SEVEN-YEAR-OLD caught drinking strong cider in a park. One million people regularly knocking back too much alcohol one night a week. The headlines of the past week have made uneasy reading when it comes to Scotland's binge-drinking culture.
The country's relationship with alcohol is under more scrutiny than ever before following years of rising levels of alcohol-related disease. Now a number of new initiatives to tackle the nation's excessive drinking are under way.
Tomorrow the first-ever alcohol awareness week in Scotland will be launched by public health minister Shona Robison. Thousands of leaflets, beer mats and alcohol-unit calculators will be distributed in pubs, clubs and supermarkets to encourage people to think about how much they are drinking.
The Sunday Herald can also reveal that a programme for screening people for alcohol problems is to be rolled out across health boards across Scotland next year. Patients identified as being at high risk of drinking more than recommended limits will be asked about their consumption of alcohol by their GP and offered advice.
Other measures include a roll-out of test purchasing "sting" operations across all police forces by the end of this year, to help tackle under-age drinking. Results from a pilot carried out in Fife, just published, found one in five licensed premises was breaking the law by selling alcohol to under-18s.
For the first time it appears alcohol is firmly at the top of the health agenda. But, while the emphasis of the aware-ness week is on personal responsibility, doctors are arguing that more needs to be done to counteract the marketing and promotion of products by the multimillion-pound alcohol industry.
A quick glance at the statistics reveals why the medical profession believes urgent action is needed to tackle alcohol-related harm. Drinking is now a factor in more than one in 10 of all attendances at hospital casualty departments. Alcohol problems costs the Scottish economy at least £1 billion a year, through lost days at work, accidents and injuries and direct costs to the NHS.
Latest figures show the number of women dying from drink in Scotland reached record levels in 2005 - 492, compared to 224 in 1980. The figures have been rising for men too, with 1021 dying from diseases such as cirrhosis of the liver, alcoholic pancreatitis and mental and behavioural disorders caused by alcohol, compared with 371 in 1980.
It's a situation psychiatrist Dr Iain Smith, who specialises in alcohol and drug problems, has seen reflected over the past two decades at Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow. "We are seeing more women with problem drinking, which I think is a marker of it becoming more socially normalised," he says. "There are also more younger people - on occasion we have seen a 16-year-old who has been hooked on alcohol for four years, which I wouldn't have seen perhaps 15 years ago."
Alcohol awareness week aims to provide consumers with information on what a unit of alcohol is; for instance, while a pint of standard beer at 3.5% strength is 2 units, a pint of premium beer at 5% strength equates to 2.8 units. The campaign is also urging people to evaluate if they are sticking to recommended maximum limits of 3-4 units per day for men and 2-3 per day for women.
However, yesterday it was reported that these guidelines, introduced 20 years ago, were based on no more than an "intelligent guess". Richard Smith, a member of the Royal College of Physicians working party that produced the recommendations, admitted the limits were prompted by "a feeling that you had to say something".
Health secretary Nicola Sturgeon describes the awareness initiative, which is one of the first under the government's partnership agreement with the alcohol industry, as "groundbreaking".
"One of the important things to stress is that the message promoted next week is not in any sense an anti-alcohol message, it is a message about safe and responsible consumption of alcohol," she says.
But the British Medical Association is among those who argue that clear compulsory labelling on all alcoholic products could achieve this. Dr Andrew Buist, deputy chairman of the BMA's Scottish general practitioners committee, says the current system, which is voluntary, does not always give easily understandable information. "We are proposing it is mandatory and alcohol is clearly labelled in a standardised way that consumers can understand," he said.
Among the numerous industry representatives backing the awareness week is the Scottish Licensed Trade Association. Senior vice-president Steve Mudie argues it is important to provide a "balance" to the messages going out on the dangers of alcohol.
"We are opening doors to the concept of alcohol awareness week so that people can actually understand what alcohol is and then make their own decision as an adult," he says. "Providing it is taken responsibly and with some care, there is nothing wrong with consuming alcohol - however, you do have to be aware of the fact that alcohol is a drug."
While the industry has been keen to back this initiative, it has not been so quick to lend support to others. When justice secretary Kenny MacAskill outlined plans to ban the sale of cut-price and free alcohol offers in shops, the Scottish Retail Consortium attacked the move as "dubious but headline grabbing". The Wine and Spirit Trading Association has written to Westminster urging it to step in to block the "anti-competitive" proposals.
Yet some medical experts believe that tackling the issues of price and availability is the only way forward in curbing Scotland's drinking. The Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems, a body set up by the Scottish Medical Royal Colleges, is supporting alcohol awareness week. But director Evelyn Gillan also argues that urging individual restraint in an environment which is promoting excess at the same time is "problematic".
"The message to people is you need to drink less - but then we are making it easier for them to buy two bottles of wine instead of one when they are going to the supermarket," she says.
Gillan says that, while there is strong evidence putting up the price of alcohol was linked to a reduction in alcohol related harm, it is an approach not welcomed by the "highly influential" drinks industry. "If you look at alcohol policy over the past 10 years, the focus of alcohol policy has been very much on individual responsibility and problems - that certainly chimes with the industry's analysis of alcohol problems," she says.
"They have shied away from the policies that regulate the market like price and availability, even though there is a huge body of evidence now saying that is the most effective thing you can do."
However, while Sturgeon agrees there are "issues" around alcohol products or advertising aimed at a younger audience, she argues that working with the industry is the best way forward.
"I would like to get as far as we can with them the alcohol industry co-operatively and if there comes a point where we think we have to look at other options because they are not prepared to go far enough, then that is what we will do."
One difficulty for the Scottish government - which will publish a five-year action plan on alcohol in 2008 - is that its powers are limited. But Sturgeon points to the example of moves to ban airguns, which is being considered as separate legislation for Scotland, subject to agreement from Westminster.
There appears little doubt that alcohol-related harm is taking its toll in Scotland - whether the situation can be reversed remains to be seen. As Sturgeon acknowledges: "We know Scotland's culture of drinking to get drunk will not be changed overnight."
|
|

Posted by: tom, Baden Baden on 7:43am Sun 21 Oct 07
Scotland has had a problem with alcohol consumption since the early 19th century. There is as much chance fo the beer & spirits industry agreeing to limit the availibility of alcohol as a street corner hereoin dealer agreeing not to deal. Businesses are by definition out to earn profits; they will never agree to anything which limits their revenue earning potential. The only way to deal with the alcohol problem is to limit availability and affordability.
Scotland has had a problem with alcohol consumption since the early 19th century. There is as much chance fo the beer & spirits industry agreeing to limit the availibility of alcohol as a street corner hereoin dealer agreeing not to deal. Businesses are by definition out to earn profits; they will never agree to anything which limits their revenue earning potential. The only way to deal with the alcohol problem is to limit availability and affordability.
Posted by: peds, rehab on 9:01am Sun 21 Oct 07
In a word......no!
Posted by: Bridei MacBile, Edinburgh on 9:14am Sun 21 Oct 07
Consumption of alcohol has increased with the increase in disposable income. It is also part of the Scottish culture. It wold take a brave governement to increase taxes so significantly that it might make to consumption. Reducing the alcohol levels in some drinks could have some minor effect, without hurtig profits. Tax the rveyors for the NHS bill.
Consumption of alcohol has increased with the increase in disposable income. It is also part of the Scottish culture. It wold take a brave governement to increase taxes so significantly that it might make to consumption. Reducing the alcohol levels in some drinks could have some minor effect, without hurtig profits. Tax the rveyors for the NHS bill.
Posted by: BM, Glasgow on 9:22am Sun 21 Oct 07
Putting up drink prices will only cause poverty. Alcoholics will drink as much as ever, but in the case of the poorer ones, their children will go unclothed and unfed to pay for the higher prices. The richer alcoholics will be able to afford the increases anyway. Taxing never solved any problem.
Putting up drink prices will only cause poverty. Alcoholics will drink as much as ever, but in the case of the poorer ones, their children will go unclothed and unfed to pay for the higher prices. The richer alcoholics will be able to afford the increases anyway. Taxing never solved any problem.
Posted by: Andy, Scotland on 11:27am Sun 21 Oct 07
With any centuries old cultural 'problem' the only real answer is long term education and awareness. It has taken nearly fifty years of anti-smoking education and publicity to make inroads into that problem and it is still far from solved. If anyone thinks Tesco, Asda, Morrisons, and the drinks industry are going to help solve this alcohol consumption problem then they are dreaming. People like alcohol, to change that will take at least a century.
With any centuries old cultural 'problem' the only real answer is long term education and awareness. It has taken nearly fifty years of anti-smoking education and publicity to make inroads into that problem and it is still far from solved. If anyone thinks Tesco, Asda, Morrisons, and the drinks industry are going to help solve this alcohol consumption problem then they are dreaming. People like alcohol, to change that will take at least a century.
Posted by: Rab The Man, Was My Uncle on 1:51pm Sun 21 Oct 07
It's clear that a major part of the problem is the all-too-wide availability of alcohol.
SO.......as a start.......why don't we greatly reduce the number of outlets (none in supermarkets, petrol stations etc.), make the retailers stamp the label/bottle/can with their name (as a measure of traceability for the underage problem), and make the licencing procedures VERY tight and even draconian for those off-licences etc that habitually serve under-age drinkers, or those who are clearly intoxicated.Off-Lice
nces should be aware that a very serious view will be taken of failures to comply and that licences can and will be withdrawn for seemingly relatively minor offences.
The other element to be tackled is that being drunk is worn nowadays as a "badge of honour". Who amongst us doesn't regularly hear someone (man and woman alike therse days) brag to their workmates about just how seriously PLASTERED they were the night before??,.. and often finishing with a laughing "confession" about SOME act of anti-social behaviour.
We need therefore to re-introduce the public awareness that drunkenness in a public place is of itself a crime, and a crime that our law officers will be instructed to enforce with much greater vigour than in recent years, and a near-"Zero-tolerance
" of drink-fuelled anti-social behaviour. This in turn means of course that the courts will be encouraged to inflict MUCH more serious penalties on such miscreants who need to be made aware that they no longer get tapped into the universal court plea of "Ah wiz p***ed your honour". This should be seen as a straight admission of social unnacceptability and punished accordingly.
I know that there are MANY, MANY out there who will be horrified at this approach, but the sad truth is that we've allowed this problem to fester on the streets for WAY too long and we need to re-invigorate the public to the view that public drunkenness and it's anti-social side-effects are now as seriously viewed as was/is drunken driving, which was similarly tolerated a generation or so back.
If you don't agree, that's fair enough.but I WOULD like to hear better suggestions !!
It's clear that a major part of the problem is the all-too-wide availability of alcohol.
SO.......as a start.......why don't we greatly reduce the number of outlets (none in supermarkets, petrol stations etc.), make the retailers stamp the label/bottle/can with their name (as a measure of traceability for the underage problem), and make the licencing procedures VERY tight and even draconian for those off-licences etc that habitually serve under-age drinkers, or those who are clearly intoxicated.Off-Lice
nces should be aware that a very serious view will be taken of failures to comply and that licences can and will be withdrawn for seemingly relatively minor offences.
The other element to be tackled is that being drunk is worn nowadays as a "badge of honour". Who amongst us doesn't regularly hear someone (man and woman alike therse days) brag to their workmates about just how seriously PLASTERED they were the night before??,.. and often finishing with a laughing "confession" about SOME act of anti-social behaviour.
We need therefore to re-introduce the public awareness that drunkenness in a public place is of itself a crime, and a crime that our law officers will be instructed to enforce with much greater vigour than in recent years, and a near-"Zero-tolerance
" of drink-fuelled anti-social behaviour. This in turn means of course that the courts will be encouraged to inflict MUCH more serious penalties on such miscreants who need to be made aware that they no longer get tapped into the universal court plea of "Ah wiz p***ed your honour". This should be seen as a straight admission of social unnacceptability and punished accordingly.
I know that there are MANY, MANY out there who will be horrified at this approach, but the sad truth is that we've allowed this problem to fester on the streets for WAY too long and we need to re-invigorate the public to the view that public drunkenness and it's anti-social side-effects are now as seriously viewed as was/is drunken driving, which was similarly tolerated a generation or so back.
If you don't agree, that's fair enough.but I WOULD like to hear better suggestions !!
Posted by: sue, Glasgow on 5:49pm Sun 21 Oct 07
A balanced approach is needed. Alcohol sales are at their lowest for five years according to revenue and customs, and sales in pubs and clubs are down 10%. It stands to reason we are actually not drinking anymore than we were five years ago. Not only that but the so-called alcohol safety limits 21 units for men and 14 for women were introduced 20 years ago and at the time were just a guess. The majority of people drink sensibly, but that just doesn't make good headlines!
A balanced approach is needed. Alcohol sales are at their lowest for five years according to revenue and customs, and sales in pubs and clubs are down 10%. It stands to reason we are actually not drinking anymore than we were five years ago. Not only that but the so-called alcohol safety limits 21 units for men and 14 for women were introduced 20 years ago and at the time were just a guess. The majority of people drink sensibly, but that just doesn't make good headlines!
Posted by: allymax, upvinesass, scotland. on 6:24pm Sun 21 Oct 07
Actually, Scotland has had a long tradition of beer/ale making since the 10th century. Lots of little breweries were foundin local villages; as much as 5 breweries were located in Glasgow in that period.
It is a long held culture that Scots have an ale or a beer daily. Unfortunately we seem to be binging on the stuff. I'd like to know why.
Actually, Scotland has had a long tradition of beer/ale making since the 10th century. Lots of little breweries were foundin local villages; as much as 5 breweries were located in Glasgow in that period.
It is a long held culture that Scots have an ale or a beer daily. Unfortunately we seem to be binging on the stuff. I'd like to know why.
Posted by: Poetry in motion, Escher Waterfall on 8:28pm Sun 21 Oct 07
To join the article I'd like to share this sweet little poem with you all:
He grabbed me . . .
He grabbed me around my slender neck;
I could not call or scream
He grabbed me to his dingy room,
Where he could not be seen
He tore away my flimsy wrap,
And took upon my form
I was so cold, damp and scared,
while he was hot and warm
His fervent lips he pressed to mine,
I gave him every drop
He drained me of my very self,
I couldn't make him stop
He made me what I am today
That's why you find me here
A broken bottle, thrown away,
That once was full of BEER!
To join the article I'd like to share this sweet little poem with you all:
He grabbed me . . .
He grabbed me around my slender neck;
I could not call or scream
He grabbed me to his dingy room,
Where he could not be seen
He tore away my flimsy wrap,
And took upon my form
I was so cold, damp and scared,
while he was hot and warm
His fervent lips he pressed to mine,
I gave him every drop
He drained me of my very self,
I couldn't make him stop
He made me what I am today
That's why you find me here
A broken bottle, thrown away,
That once was full of BEER!
Posted by: Pat, opinionated, Glasgow on 10:35pm Sun 21 Oct 07
SCOTLAND
[quote][bold]a culture of excessive drinking[/bold] [/quote]
If the newspapers keep on calling excessive drinking a culture then it certainly will be accepted as one. Listen here, it's NOT!
All the questioning whether or not this and that is definitely not giving the issue a positive turn in the right direction.
It's like telling a child that he or she is stupid. In the end the child accepts it and doesn't work on any improvement anymore. I think it happened to me, until it was too late. (Just joking) Thank God I'm not a Streber; I'm happy with my life, apart from lacking some serotonine once in a while.
SCOTLAND
a culture of excessive drinking
If the newspapers keep on calling excessive drinking a culture then it certainly will be accepted as one. Listen here, it's NOT!
All the questioning whether or not this and that is definitely not giving the issue a positive turn in the right direction.
It's like telling a child that he or she is stupid. In the end the child accepts it and doesn't work on any improvement anymore. I think it happened to me, until it was too late. (Just joking) Thank God I'm not a Streber; I'm happy with my life, apart from lacking some serotonine once in a while.
Posted by: Pat, in the heid on 10:57pm Sun 21 Oct 07
[quote]SEROTONIN[/quote]
Molecular formula N2OC10H12
5-hydroxytryptomine, or 5-HT
Monoamine neurotransmitter synthesized in serotonergic neurons in the CNS and enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal tract.
ok?
SEROTONIN
Molecular formula N2OC10H12
5-hydroxytryptomine, or 5-HT
Monoamine neurotransmitter synthesized in serotonergic neurons in the CNS and enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal tract.
ok?
Posted by: J Butlerson on 1:20pm Sat 3 Nov 07
Alcohol is a mind-altering addictive drug and just because it (sadly) is legal doesn't mean with the increasing research coming out more frequently now about the deadly effects of this drug, that it should remain so. Drinking is a stupid, disgusting low-class habit and the day will come that it will be socially unacceptable and alcohol users will become the social pariahs they deserve to be. It has already started. Alcohol is involved in 50% of all violent crime, 50% of all murders, 33% of all child abuse, 33%-65% of all suicides (depending of reporting location), 50% of all traffic deaths, 40% of all domestic violence and causes cancer (breast, mouth, pharynx, esophagus, liver, pancreas), heart muscle weakness, cirrhosis (liver scarring and death), heart attack and stroke, brain damage and neurological disease, bleeding ulcers, premature aging, infertility, miscarriage, birth defects, impotence, bone marrow damage, more severe osteoporosis, weakening of skeletal muscles, production of a poison (acetaldehyde) which causes "hangover" sickness, unwanted pregnancies, numbing of the brain center for judgment, increased risk of pneumonia and just plain stupid, disgusting, low-class behaviour at the least and violent anti-social behaviour at the worst. Make alcohol users pay for the damage they cause for the NHS, the crime they commit and vandalism they do. It is not fair to tax non-drinkers for drinkers stupidity. Hold the government officials accountable and let them know you are watching and will register your feelings at the next election. Let them know that kow-towing to the alcohol cartel rather than the public good is just not on. Who do they really represent? Is there money changing hands here? Ban all alcohol advertising and use of alcohol at any public events and government functions. Ban alcohol cartel sponsorship of and advertising at sporting events where they try to hook the young. Alcohol is NOT a benign thing, it is a deadly, dangerous, addictive, mind-altering drug. It is the most destructive drug in the world. It is funny to hear our leaders expressing shock and outrage about "drug" use (cocaine, heroin etc.) while they sit around sipping their liquid version. Hypocrisy. Hold them to account!
Alcohol is a mind-altering addictive drug and just because it (sadly) is legal doesn't mean with the increasing research coming out more frequently now about the deadly effects of this drug, that it should remain so. Drinking is a stupid, disgusting low-class habit and the day will come that it will be socially unacceptable and alcohol users will become the social pariahs they deserve to be. It has already started. Alcohol is involved in 50% of all violent crime, 50% of all murders, 33% of all child abuse, 33%-65% of all suicides (depending of reporting location), 50% of all traffic deaths, 40% of all domestic violence and causes cancer (breast, mouth, pharynx, esophagus, liver, pancreas), heart muscle weakness, cirrhosis (liver scarring and death), heart attack and stroke, brain damage and neurological disease, bleeding ulcers, premature aging, infertility, miscarriage, birth defects, impotence, bone marrow damage, more severe osteoporosis, weakening of skeletal muscles, production of a poison (acetaldehyde) which causes "hangover" sickness, unwanted pregnancies, numbing of the brain center for judgment, increased risk of pneumonia and just plain stupid, disgusting, low-class behaviour at the least and violent anti-social behaviour at the worst. Make alcohol users pay for the damage they cause for the NHS, the crime they commit and vandalism they do. It is not fair to tax non-drinkers for drinkers stupidity. Hold the government officials accountable and let them know you are watching and will register your feelings at the next election. Let them know that kow-towing to the alcohol cartel rather than the public good is just not on. Who do they really represent? Is there money changing hands here? Ban all alcohol advertising and use of alcohol at any public events and government functions. Ban alcohol cartel sponsorship of and advertising at sporting events where they try to hook the young. Alcohol is NOT a benign thing, it is a deadly, dangerous, addictive, mind-altering drug. It is the most destructive drug in the world. It is funny to hear our leaders expressing shock and outrage about "drug" use (cocaine, heroin etc.) while they sit around sipping their liquid version. Hypocrisy. Hold them to account!