Home
August 20, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
A wake-up call for the world
Global warming: New report depicts grim future ahead of bali climate change summit

IF THE world fails to slow global warming, it will overwhelm us. And it will do so more certainly, more quickly and more dangerously than we ever feared. That, in essence, is the stark message delivered to world leaders by climate scientists yesterday. The increase in storms, floods and droughts caused by pollution will threaten the lives and livelihoods of billions around the planet.

"Unmitigated climate change would, in the long term, be likely to exceed the capacity of natural, managed and human systems to adapt," concludes a report released by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) at a meeting in Valencia, Spain.

The report will be the main evidence to be considered at a summit on climate change which begins in two weeks in Bali, Indonesia. There, international governments will have to decide how to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which limits pollution and is due to run out in 2012.

Climate change is "the defining challenge of our age" said UN secretary-general Ban Ki Moon yesterday. "Today the world's scientists have spoken clearly and with one voice. In Bali I expect the world's policymakers to do the same."

Fears that the US might succeed in diluting the report's findings appear to have been unfounded. It was greeted by a chorus of support from environmental groups across the globe, and in Scotland.

"The report is a wake-up call to the world," said Dr Dan Barlow, WWF Scotland's acting director.

"Given the Scottish government's commitment to an 80% cut in emissions by 2050 and a Scottish Climate Bill we are well-placed to demonstrate real leadership in tackling climate change."

The IPCC report, the summation of six years' work by 2500 scientists from 130 countries, warns that global warming "could lead to some impacts that are abrupt or irreversible". Melting of only some of the Polar ice sheets could cause sea levels to rise by "metres", flooding coastlines, river deltas and small islands.

Between 20% and 30% of all the world's plants and animals are "likely to be at increased risk of extinction" if average temperature increases exceed 1.5-2.4C. If temperatures rise by 3.5C, 40-70% of species could become extinct. The report predicts that before the end of the century average temperatures could increase by between 1.8 and 4C.

"There is now higher confidence in the projected increases in droughts, heatwaves and floods as well as their adverse impacts," it says.

The report summarises a frightening series of predicted impacts: mass water and food shortages in Africa, flooding in Asia and Europe, agricultural decline in Australia and heatwaves in North America (see panel). Many of these are expected to occur by 2020 or 2030, much sooner than previously predicted. Though no region can escape, the effects are likely to be worst in Africa, the Arctic and small islands.

Scotland will probably be spared one of the worst-case scenarios - a big freeze triggered by the loss of the Gulf Stream - at least for 100 years. Although the current which warms northern Europe is likely to slow in the 21st century, the report concludes it is "very unlikely to undergo a large abrupt transition".

Yesterday's report attempts to "synthesise" three reports and 3000 pages on the science, impacts and mitigation of climate change published by the IPCC earlier this year. Next month the IPCC will receive the Nobel Peace Prize, shared with the former US vice-president, Al Gore, for its work.

The report is the fourth major assessment from the IPCC since it was set up nearly 20 years ago, and is by far the most alarming. It lists possible ways of combating climate change, including increased energy efficiency, renewable energy, cleaner vehicles and better building insulation, although it doesn't recommend any particular course.

"We need a new ethic by which every human being realises the importance of the challenge we are facing and starts to take action through changes in lifestyle and attitude," said IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri.

Andrew Pendleton from Christian Aid said: "It's tough to welcome a report that carries such bad news. But we must heed its warning and get on with an emergency programme of cuts in emissions."

THE report also puts to rest any notion that climate change is a result of natural variation rather than human pollution. Human influences "very likely" contributed to sea level rises in the second half of the last century, and are "likely" to have contributed to changes in wind and storm patterns and increases in extreme hot nights.

The report was described as "a milestone" by the EU environment commissioner, Stavros Dimas. "The report's findings amount to a stark warning that the world must act fast if we are to prevent climate change from reaching devastating levels," he said. "The good news is that it also shows deep emission cuts are both feasible and affordable."

One group, however, sounded a note of caution. The Global Forest Coalition, a group of environment, development and indigenous people's organisations, called on governments to reject "false solutions" like biofuels and carbon trading.

Chairman Dr Miguel Lovera said biofuels could make climate change worse, and wreak social havoc by destroying forests, while carbon offsetting schemes, the coalition argued, had led to "devastating impacts" on local communities.

"Many indigenous peoples in the Pacific face the possibility of losing everything - their homes, territories and livelihoods because of rising sea levels," said Sandy Gauntlett, chair of the Pacific Indigenous Peoples Environment Coalition. "We insist governments do something now to stop this. They need to invest in forest conservation, sustainable transport and solar and wind energy."

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Dr Coles on 12:31am Sun 18 Nov 07
There is no debate; it’s political propaganda NOT science. UK court says Gore is a fraud. August 2007 Update: Man-made Catastrophic Global Warming Not True. Unfortunately, Hansen is a political hack of George Soros. Further, flawed NASA Global Warming data paid for by George Soros. In order to be an intelligent reader you must have a basic knowledge. Please do your own homework; a starting point http://www.InteliOrg
.com/
Posted by: Niall McKillop, Lochaber on 2:06am Sun 18 Nov 07
More alarmist rubbish from those who appear to know no better: but let's not forget the $5 billion of funding now available for Anthropogenic Climate Change research. The Antarctic is actually been getting colder since about 1992, not warmer. One small peninsula, which points northward towards Chile, has indeed experienced some melting, but real climatologists believe this has been caused mostly by an entirely natural, decadal or otherwise cyclical re-distribution of low pressure systems.

And Greenland is not melting either. The areas now being used (again) for cultivation by Greenland have been far warmer in the past - for instance, during the period when Greenlanders were able to discover North America, and even as recently as the nineteen-twenties, before the widespread use of fossil fuels, Greenlanders were growing their veg and tatties, and feeding their cattle and sheep, on land which during the thirties once again was swallowed up by re-expanding ice fields.

The rising sea levels scam is perhaps one of the worst of all. Gore says twenty feet, but even the IPCC admit it could be as little as 4 inches over 100 years, nothing that the earth hasn't seen before and coped with weell enough. Remember, only land ice that melts can affect sea levels. All the guff about polar ice (90% sea-ice) means absolutely nothing in terms of sea level rises.

Finally, think of all those companies at the forefront of alternative energy, or worse, all those banks and institutions investing so much in the trading of so-called carbon offsets. Don't be fooled. There is no consensus, and even if there was, consensus is inimical to good science, and skepticism part of its essence.

Don't ever believe anything a politician or a corporation tells you - or especially the media for which alarmism is life blood. Do some intelligent reading. It's not too hard to find.
NM.
Posted by: Alan Marston, Birmingham on 4:50am Sun 18 Nov 07
So, I have to choose between believing a collection of eminent scientists who say X, and believing a collection of random people on the internet who say Y? I think X wins for me: I'm all for scepticism, but automatically rubbishing everything in the media or spoken by an expert is plain silly.
Posted by: Niall McKillop, Lochaber on 5:34am Sun 18 Nov 07
AM, if you have such a simplistic view, i.e., 'eminent scientists' versus collection of random people on the internet', then I'd be surprised if you're even capable of real scepticism at all. The so-called eminent scientists include a hotel manager and a vascular surgeon - there's not a single, creditable climatologist among them. There is no, repeat, no, consensus, and far from being a collection etc on the internet, most of the worlds proper climatologists agree there is no, repeat, no, evidence that global warming is anything other than a naturally occurring event. As I said, do some reading, it's not difficult to find.
NM.
Posted by: martin, dundee on 9:00am Sun 18 Nov 07
It seems to me that global warming is a direct consequence of an ever increasing global population and the exteme form of capitalism that is sweeping the planet.The need to produce more and more, and the need to consume more and more of the worlds resources is quite obviously going to lead to serious long term problems.
Until there is a fundemental shift in the economic system, from aggressive capitalism to a more benign form, the world will continue on a dangerous path.The environment is not something we can ultimately control for our own benefit.It can however control us and our way of life at present is harming the environment to the extent that humans are upsetting the balance of nature.
It is the economic system that must change if we are to leave future generations a world worth living in.

Posted by: Slioch, Scottish Highlands on 9:48am Sun 18 Nov 07
Dr Coles comment has appeared several times in various places in recent weeks. It was nonsense the first time, now it is repetitive nonsense.

As for Niall McKillop: he produces the same mixture of falsehoods, misinformation, misunderstanding, irrelevant detail and cynicism that has been answered so many times before.
Posted by: Conway on 10:57am Sun 18 Nov 07
Unlike the Heralds enviromental editor I like to get more than one opinion, for example my encyclopedia...
"Scientists who probed two kilometers (1.2 miles) through a Greenland glacier to recover the oldest plant DNA on record said Thursday the planet was far warmer hundreds of thousands of years ago than is generally believed. DNA of trees, plants and insects including butterflies and spiders from beneath the southern Greenland glacier was estimated to date to 450,000 to 900,000 years ago, according to the remnants retrieved from this long-vanished boreal forest. That view contrasts sharply with the prevailing one that a lush forest of this kind could only have existed in Greenland as recently as 2.4 million years ago. The existence of those DNA samples suggest the temperature probably reached 10 degrees C (50 degrees Fahrenheit) in the summer and -17 °C (1 °F) in the winter. They also indicated that during the last interglacial period, 116,000–130,000 years ago, when temperatures were on average 5 °C (9 °F) higher than now, the glaciers on Greenland did not completely melt"
Posted by: david hill, Bern, Switzerland on 3:52pm Sun 18 Nov 07
The world's problems are so large and complex that no government or governments in political concert with each others, can now solve them. There is only one thing that will provide the means and solution for humankind to survive past this present century, the ORE-STEM Complex and its global interlinked Satellite Incubator Centres. For if the leading scientific minds in the world in concert cannot do this, no politician or others can. It is as simple as that. The problem is of course that politicians will not listen to the independent mind and voice. They only listen to themselves and their so-called informed advisers, but where this thinking has been found totally wrong time and time again. For just one instance amongst countless is when the chief scientific adviser to the PM in the United Kingdom in WW2 stated to the prime minister that the Germans had not the technology to produce a flying bomb. But where only two months later they were reigning down on the UK. This time though, the destructive force of nature will do its worst and where as always, it will be the people who ultimately suffer and not the politicians or their astute advisers. Mark my words, politicians will do relatively nothing to stem what has now been put in motion by the powerful in industry and politics in return for a quick to medium term financial return and no other. Destroying the planet in the name of self-interest is a crime against humanity and it should be seen that way.
Therefore people will have to come to the reasoning, sooner or later, that the ORE-STEM complex, thought out by some of the foremost scientific minds is the only answer. For to stop the now ever-growing human destructive juggernaut in its tracks, only something of an immense undertaking of an equal magnitude will do this. The sooner politicians and industrialists realize this, the sooner the world may have a chance to prevent what is on the horizon for humankind.

Dr David Hill
World Innovation Foundation
Bern, Switzerland
Posted by: Gary Young, Mountain View, CA on 7:09pm Sun 18 Nov 07
Let's see... the IPCC is making claims that are corroborated by:

National Academy of Sciences

National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (The Hurricane Center has released several reports on this)

The Supreme Court (which ruled recently that Co2 was a harmful pollutant which the EPA has to control)

I do not believe random crackpots on the internet when there is good and credible science indicating that this is a very serious problem.

It seems like a lot of people don't want to believe it. I suppose this is the standard grief cycle when people are faced with something so depressing. Denial being the first step. But we'd better get past Denial before it's too late (and it may already be too late, sadly).
Posted by: Sanny, Portugal on 8:42pm Sun 18 Nov 07
Can we all please remember that these same bodies of eminent scientist and organization are the same who, in the 1950's, were predicting the start of a new ice age. Instead of running around with scare stories let us examine both the dangers and the benefits of Global Warming. How can we minimise the dangers and exploit the benefits.
Before the Tree Huggers get all worked up - there ARE benefits. Also remember that in the early part of the carboniferous period the CO2 levels were much higher than today and during the medieval warm period temperatures were higher than today.

Atmospheric CO2 is natural and without it we would cease to exist. Try looking at the amount of CO2 entering the atmosphere from natural resources and compare this with the amount claimed to be man made. Man’s total contribution is 3 – 3.5%. CO2 forms less than 1% of the, so called, greenhouse gasses. So our contribution is 3-3.5 % of 1% or approximately 0.03%. Farts and gales come to mind. Look for the figures they are there in the published science papers. The other figures to look at is the amount of money being poured into research(?) that supports the GW theme.

Let us see if London returns to the croc infested swamp that it once was! That might be an improvement!! Can I look forward to a “Mediterranean” Scottish Climate when I don’t need to escape to Portugal in the winter.
Posted by: Slioch, Scottish Highlands on 9:23pm Sun 18 Nov 07
Sanny. Your post is the usual mix of:

1. untruths "these same bodies ... who, in the 1950's, were predicting the start of a new ice age" and "medieval warm period temperatures were higher than today." and "Man’s total contribution is 3 – 3.5%."

2. Irrelevances: "early part of the carboniferous period the CO2 levels were much higher than today" and "Atmospheric CO2 is natural and without it we would cease to exist."

Untruths and irrelevancies are no substitute for clear hard thinking, and you certainly won't understand climate change if you indulge in the former.
Posted by: Peter, Boulder on 1:11pm Mon 19 Nov 07
I don't think this is alarmist at all. Take a look at the Indigenous Issues Today news blog, there are several stories on how climate change is impacting indigenous peoples around the world today! We may not know all the reasons, but things are changing fast, and not always for the better.
Posted by: Robert Rogerson, Vancouver Island on 6:27am Tue 20 Nov 07
Some of the global warming skeptics might learn something if they go visit the Innuit peoples of northern Canad. Not too long ago it would have been advisable to pack skates , snowshoes and skis; they'd be well advised to pack gumboots nowadays.
Posted by: get real, west coast on 6:31pm Sun 25 Nov 07
How many climate reports does it take to change a light bulb?

Surely if climate scientists are so worried about the imminent distaster then they should stop flying to conferences all around the world. You don't see many of them living simply do you?
Posted by: vg on 3:53am Tue 11 Dec 07
just published by eminent meteorologists and climatologists in the International Journal of climatology.... Self-answering

http://canadafreepre
ss.com/index.php/art
icle/908
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login