Home
August 29, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Scots charities hit as Lottery cash goes to Olympics
Communities lose out as £184m is diverted to Games

SCOTS CHARITIES are facing "death by a thousand cuts", according to voluntary sector leaders reeling from raids on vital lottery cash.

Community groups are dismayed by MPs' approval of the transfer of £184 million of lotto funding for good causes in Scotland toward the spiralling cost of the London Olympics.

The diversion so far of more than £2 billion of National Lottery money to the 2012 games means many community groups for the disadvantaged, as well as arts, sports and heritage organisations, are already feeling the squeeze.

Martin Sime, director of the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, said: "The National Lottery is already turning down lots of good proposals because it hasn't got the money, and it's going to turn down more. There will be loss of jobs and service. At precisely the time when more work is needed to combat social problems, there aren't the sources available to make that happen. It's not justified and it's wrong in principle."

"We're not anti-Olympics; if they want to have the games in London, then fine. But why should Scottish charities have to pay for that?"

Helen Macneil, chief executive at the Glasgow Council for the Voluntary Sector (GCVS), said many jobs and community projects are under threat. "It's all very unsettling. We know of organisations where staff are leaving or are on redundancy. It's a nightmare trying to plan ahead when you don't know if funding streams for chunks of work are going to be there in three months' time.

"It's death by a thousand cuts. The cards are stacked against us at the moment and a lot of small to medium-size groups are in serious danger."

A GCVS poll found more than 75% of charitable groups in the city had deep concerns for their viability due to funding worries. The Edinburgh Voluntary Organisations Council is equally concerned about cuts in the capital, where black holes in the city council budget have compounded the difficulties.

Many are predicting tough times ahead for smaller charities as the sector also sees European funding cut as cash moves to the new eastern European EU states, and the restructuring of local authority resources following the Scottish government's freeze on council tax.

"The cuts to lottery funding are part of a wider problem, with different sources of funding drying up or changing at the same time," said Macneil.

Ian Brooke of South Edinburgh Voluntary Sector Support Project added: "In the last year, there have been organisations I expected to get grants which didn't get any. It's been surprising. We'll have to wait to find out who suffers, but it may be grassroots groups that are the most disproportionately affected."

Some charities are finding it difficult to get funds to develop sporting facilities, a bitter irony considering the major sporting events heading to the UK.

Possil Renewal general manager John Duncanson, who helped set up the Millennium Leisure Centre in the deprived Glasgow community, said: "Money seems to be getting squeezed because warchests are being built up for the Commonwealth Games and the Olympics. We've shown you can change lifestyles and opportunities, but we can't get support for love nor money."

Allan Teesdale, who runs the Ashdown Grove Community Association for pensioners in south Edinburgh, added: "It's communities like ours that put money into the lottery; we buy the tickets. We've done very well so far with grants, but it's sad that less money will be available. Quite a few pensioners will suffer."

Sime warned that Glasgow should learn from the damage done by diverting funding to the Olympics. "If they follow the same mechanisms for organising the Commonwealth Games, we'll lose out twice," he said.

SNP Westminster spokesman on culture, media and sport, Pete Wishart MP, criticised the 36 Scottish MPs who voted to approve further payments to the Olympic Lottery Distribution fund.

He said: "This raid on lottery funds will hit every community across the country, and it was simply despicable for Scottish MPs to short change their own constituents like this."

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Margaret, Scotland on 9:08pm Sat 19 Jan 08
Where's Bendy Wendy lisping about the impact on 'vulnerable two year olds', etc? Come on, Bendy. What do you say about this heinous theft by London Labour from Scotland's vulnerable communities?
Posted by: LEGION, ALBA on 9:40pm Sat 19 Jan 08
APPALLING. Its the only word to describe London Labours robbery of good causes.
Posted by: Jimbo on 9:49pm Sat 19 Jan 08
Margaret wrote:
Where's Bendy Wendy lisping about the impact on 'vulnerable two year olds', etc? Come on, Bendy. What do you say about this heinous theft by London Labour from Scotland's vulnerable communities?
Hi Margaret,

I am of the opinion that 'vulnerable two year olds', etc, only matter to the Labour Party when there is political gain to be made from them.

As Pat Watters, the President of COSLA says, he has heard more from Labour about vulnerable groups in the last few weeks than he has heard during the eight years when they were in power.

Ms Alexander's hypocrisy on this issue is on a par with Nicol Stephen's nose for sleaze. Strange that he's never ever mentioned getting a whiff coming from the direction of the Labour party since their (the Labour party) circumventing of the law on donations came to light.
Posted by: nouveauxscum on 9:53pm Sat 19 Jan 08
C'mon guys, stop being so short-sighted and "mean-spirited". Scotland will after all, be getting the used seats for the commonwealth games. You just can't quibble with that sort of generosity.
Posted by: Celtic Lion, Roar on 10:42pm Sat 19 Jan 08
Pete Wishart did well to stand up and tell the truth about the lottery funds, even though Labour thought it appropriate to laugh it off. I seriously think Labour have failed to see or care how people really care about this situation and how it will rub off. As I said before, come the Olympics I hope it rains now. In fact I hope it floods and is a disaster. (Sorry Londoners, nothing personal and it's mindless anger but I can't help how I feel about what Labour are doing.)
Posted by: 57vintage, Keith on 11:47pm Sat 19 Jan 08
I don't play the Lottery so it's not as if it's my taxes that are being used.

The fundamental issue surely is that since The Witch of Grantham shredded welfare services, we've had to rely on the charitable and voluntary sectors to provide safety nets and basic provision in some of our poorest communities. That's where I hoped my taxes would go.

The Lottery SHOULD be for luxuries like the Olympics and welfare safety nets should be a priority spend for governments.

We seem to have developed a strange & perverse sense of priorities.
Posted by: Celtic Lion, Roar on 11:58pm Sat 19 Jan 08
57vintage, Keith on 11:47pm today

I almost agree with you which is why I've always been opposed to the lottery and why I don't play it either. It's a voluntary tax on the poor and preys on hope. If it were up to me I'd scrap it and if necessary raise some honest taxes.

However, the lottery is running and it's being relied upon by many. That it's wrong, and people (not yourself obviously, but it's been said before a few times) saying "Simple solution really, don't play it" doesn't solve the problems which this article highlights. If you read Hansard you will have seen how the commons and the lords are dismissing the problem and it's disgusting.
Posted by: doonhamer on 12:54am Sun 20 Jan 08
Where is Mr. Angry? With all the weeping over Dougie, why is their silence of the lost of almost 200 million pounds to Scottish sport?

Another own goal.
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 6:54am Sun 20 Jan 08
Scots charities hit as Lottery cash goes to Olympics (Send "Scottish Labour to London with Wendy to get their share of the money)
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 6:54am Sun 20 Jan 08
Scots charities hit as Lottery cash goes to Olympics (Send "Scottish Labour to London with Wendy to get their share of the money)
Posted by: Fiona Sinclair, Ayrshire on 11:26am Sun 20 Jan 08
57vintage wrote:
I don\'t play the Lottery so it\'s not as if it\'s my taxes that are being used.

The fundamental issue surely is that since The Witch of Grantham shredded welfare services, we\'ve had to rely on the charitable and voluntary sectors to provide safety nets and basic provision in some of our poorest communities. That\'s where I hoped my taxes would go.

The Lottery SHOULD be for luxuries like the Olympics and welfare safety nets should be a priority spend for governments.

We seem to have developed a strange & perverse sense of priorities.
I couldn't agree more - but I would add that it is often basic services that are being farmed out to the so-called charitable sector. As you say, core services were decimated under Thatcher, and now voluntary organisations /charities have to apply every 3 years or so for funding, which is a crazy waste of resources. The `charitable sector` encompasses worthwhile organisations and multi-million pound businesses masquerading as charities. It is notable that the `grassroots` organisations are predicted to suffer more from these cutbacks. The salary levels in some of these big charities /multi-million pound businesses are often better than the private sector.

As the parent of a child with an Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD), I deeply resent the general assumption, which is particularly ingrained amongst the political classes, that the needs of disabled people are to be met from charity, and that they do not merit expenditure from general taxation - even though many `extras` are funded for the bulk of the population - such as cultural and sporting activities. This ingrained bigotry even goes as far as shutting out the voice of disabled people and their families who are service users, and taking advice on disabilities from the charities that claim to represent them, but who posess a clear conflict of interest in being service providers. If a the main charitable activity of a charity is the provision of services, which are only provided if they are paid for in advance by a local authority, they are scarcely going to bite the hand that feeds them and properly condemn or criticise service provision for a particular group, such as people with a disability.

People with ASD and their families know all about this, because of the irregular and precipitate closure of the Scottish parliament's Cross Party Group on Autistic Spectrum Disorder:-
http://www.autismrig

hts.org.uk/MainText.

html
AND
http://www.autismrig

hts.org.uk/MainText.

html#sdendnote18sym

Posted by: paul h, fife on 11:43am Sun 20 Jan 08
The true direction of subsidy in this union, and only the tip of the ice berg. Hardly what you would call a dividend, yet labour mp's choose to quietly support it whilst trying to imply the snp government are putting vaunerable groups at risk with their budget. I'm a bit exasperated at the lack of knowledge out there about what is going on. How can anyone continue to support labour? Why do all the media organisations always mislead the people by giving them the impression that Scotland is heavily reliant on subsidies from london? Surely one such organisation can make a stand for the truth.
Posted by: Mike MacKinnon on 12:09pm Sun 20 Jan 08
paul h, you've hit the nail on the head. Unfortunately, the liars, cheats and criminals that make up the Labour Parody (North British Branch) will not see it that way.

I'm waiting on Plob and Joe to come on and justify this! They won't of course as they support the criminals!
Posted by: angiebobs, mount olympia on 1:05pm Sun 20 Jan 08
The olympics is robbing Scottish voluntary sector and so will the commonwealth games - wait n see.
Both games are a bonanza for corporations - east end of glasgow and london wont be the beneficiaries - not unless they can churn out millions of tacky bits of merchandise or have a mate who can get them the construction contracts.
Posted by: Celtic Lion, Roar on 1:17pm Sun 20 Jan 08
I see the BBC are using our licence fee to cultivate more anti-Scottish feelings south of the border. I wonder if they'll see fit to get some facts right or even make mention of this robbery.

BBC Radio 5
The 5 live Report: Barnett Fair? is on Sunday 20 January at 19.30GMT
Posted by: Tom McAlister on 1:31pm Sun 20 Jan 08

Celtic Lion, Roar on.

Thanks for the info. I'll listen in to whatever hearsay is being bawjawed.

Posted by: Observer on 1:32pm Sun 20 Jan 08
We should never have reached the stage where services to vulnerable people are dependant on lottery funding, that is ridiculous I seem to pay a lot of tax every month and I expect the govt to fund esssential services, not a tax on poor people who are the only people who play the lottery on a compulsive basis.

But it totally negates Wendy Alexnader's suffer the little children routine on the issue of ring fencing, doesn't it ?
Posted by: Celtic Lion, Roar on 2:35pm Sun 20 Jan 08
Tom McAlister

Well we're helping to pay for their anti-Scottish rants, we may as well listen to it. However to be fair I know the BBC currently have an internal investigation into whether or not they are biased against the Scots, and reading in the Observer today there's to be a new BBC series in the autumn that "seeks to explode myths in Scottish history". Let's hope it's balanced, but I'll wait until it's aired before I make any judgement.

preview.tinyurl.com/
2q2ymu

Observer

I quite agree. I really think Labour have got themselves in such a position that the best they can do is stay quiet, laugh it off, or sling their own mud elsewhere. I said it already, they don't realise how much they have misjudged this one.
Posted by: Politically -incorrect Man, Glasgow on 5:41pm Sun 20 Jan 08
The most significant aspect of this decision is that it has been taken and despite the obvious adverse effects on Scottish Charities there is absolutely nothing that can be done by the people to alter it.

Is this really the kind of democracy we want Iraq to adopt?
Posted by: martin, dundee on 5:45pm Sun 20 Jan 08
And the high cost of the London Olympics is set to go even higher.The Scots will lose out to the tune of millions of pounds paying what is in effect a subsidy to the South of England.Long after the olympics are finished London will benefit from the new housing and infrastructure.Who are the subsidy junkies now??
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login