Home
May 18, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Legal challenge to baby-milk law
Companies force suspension of ‘rushed’ EU ruling

THE IMPLEMENTATION of new rules on the advertising of formula milk products has triggered a major row between the government and the infant food industry.

New EU regulations that were due to come into force in January have been suspended in England, Wales and Northern Ireland after a legal challenge by manufacturers, who are seeking a judicial review of the situation.

In Scotland, similar legal proceedings got under way last Friday, with the interim hearing expected this week.

The toughened rules on the labelling and promotion of infant and follow-on formula - a range for children between six months and two years - are aimed at ensuring efforts to improve breastfeeding rates are not being undermined.

While the Infant and Dietetic Foods Association (IDFA), which represents manufacturers, said it backs the new regulations, it claimed it has been forced to take the legal action because of a "rush" to implement the rules that makes it impossible for companies to comply.

But after the suspension of the regulations in England and Wales, the Food Standards Agency (FSA), a government body, said it was "extremely disappointed" as it had been consulting manufacturers about the regulations for almost three years.

Campaigners have also accused the manufacturers of trying to undermine efforts to toughen up existing controls. Patti Rundall, policy director of group Baby Milk Action, said aggressive marketing techniques had led to the UK formula market nearly trebling in recent years, from £119 million to £329m.

"The industry is demonstrating its total lack of concern for health and the right of parents to have truly objective and sound information," she said. "They know that if the regulations are enforced and strengthened after review, many of their misleading marketing strategies will finally have to stop."

There are already controls on advertising infant formula milk - for example, companies are not allowed to generally promote it. The restricted amount of direct advertising to parents that is permitted - such as posters in health clinics - will no longer be allowed.

Restrictions on the advertising of follow-on milks are also outlined in the new legislation. While this can still be advertised, manufacturers will have to make it clear it is intended for older babies, to ensure it cannot be confused with infant formula in the minds of consumers. Only a small number of approved health and nutrition claims will be allowed, with phrases such as "closest to breast milk" banned.

A recent report by Baby Milk Action highlighted some of the marketing techniques used by companies, such as offering voucher incentives in return for signing up to receive information on infants' milks, and branded pregnancy record books or "Baby's First Year" books that promote websites and carelines.

Rundall, who backed a total ban on advertising of any infant formula, said parents should not be pushed into breastfeeding, but had to be offered unbiased information and support to help them to make a choice. She said: "All the work on breastfeeding is being undermined by commercial promotion."

Roger Clarke, director general of the IDFA, argued the decision by parents to breastfeed, use formula or a combination was a "complex issue". "I would say to consumer groups they need to look at the issue holistically and not always put it at the door of the manufacturing industry that is providing the product," he said. "The industry carries out a very important role in terms of being able to give people advice on safe preparation or choice of product once they have made their decision."

Clarke said manufacturers backed the new legislation but the legal action had been triggered by an unexpected change to the implementation process by the FSA. He said this left companies facing conforming to the rules in six weeks instead of the expected two-year transition period, prompting concerns that products that did not comply would have to be removed from the shelves.

"You can't beat us over the head and say we haven't made the changes, because we thought we had two years like everybody else in Europe," he added.

The IDFA members that have taken the legal action are SMA Nutrition and Nutricia, which make up 98% of sales of baby milk formula in the UK. In England and Wales, it is expected the case will be heard before the end of February.

A spokesman for FSA Scotland said an interim hearing began in Scotland last Friday and was expected to continue this week. He confirmed that Scottish regulations have not been suspended but added it could not comment further until the outcome was known.

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Mike Brady, Cambridge on 10:42pm Sat 19 Jan 08
How cynical of Roger Clarke, representing the formula industry, to state: "The industry carries out a very important role in terms of being able to give people advice on safe preparation or choice of product once they have made their decision."

One of the labelling issues health campaigners want companies to address is their failure to provide warnings that powdered formula is not sterile and simple instructions on how to reduce the risks in line with government and international guidance to parents. The industry lobbied against this being a requirement in the law and succeeded in having it appear only as a recommendation in guidance notes.

A spot survey of company telephone 'carelines' found that advisors give incorrect information about reconstituting formula. Analysis of company websites has found information contradicting the advice of the Food Standards Agency and Chief Medical Officer on when to use soya formulas. Analysis of promotion shows all companies claim their formula is better than competitors, perhaps acceptable if we are talking about washing powder, but does nothing to help parents decide which formula to use if they are formula feeding for whatever reason, and undermines the independent advice available from health workers.
Posted by: Pam Lacey on 1:41pm Sun 20 Jan 08
I also called two 'carelines'. As a worried mother I couldn't understand why my Health Visitors and Midwives were saying that all formulas must be made up with water over 70 degrees in order to kill bacteria, but the formula tins and leaflets say 50 degrees. Surely the manufacturers should be made to follow the safe and tested guidelines of the Department of Health. There would soon be an outcry if babies died (as they have in Europe) because parents weren't given the correct information.

The regulations and laws are meant to make formula feeding as safe as possible for the babies.
Posted by: boycott nestle on 8:57am Mon 21 Jan 08
Nestle one of the leading manufacturers of formula goes to the third world in order to push formula on to poor people who can barely afford it. Their children end up malnourished because they water it down to make it last.
Posted by: boycott nestle on 9:11am Mon 21 Jan 08
See www.babymilkaction.o
rg
Posted by: barbara, Yorkshire on 1:42pm Mon 21 Jan 08
Parents do not distinguish between infant formula milks and follow-on milks for babies over six months because the same logos are used on both. In fact, follow-on milks were invented to circumvent the rules preventing the promotion of infant formula and there is no independent research to show that they are any better than cows' milk for babies over six months. Mothers need information that is free from commercial pressure when deciding how to feed their babies. No one ever made any money out of promoting breastfeeding ...
Posted by: Pete Moss, Datchet on 1:59pm Tue 22 Jan 08
Let's hope Scotland's judges stand up for the Food Standards Agency and dismiss the industry's claim that they were taken by surprise by the new rules.

Scotland led the way on protecting babies' right to be breastfed in public, I hope it does the same again in this case.
Posted by: Morgan Gallagher, Bedford on 4:58pm Fri 25 Jan 08
The current 'hiding under the bed covers' attitude to formula and 'follow-on' powder in this country smacks of the 1950's attitude to tobacco: no one in industry and Government was prepared then to talk about health risks as too much profit was involved. When the mothers in this country finally get to hear the fact's about the modified cow's milk they are giving their infants, and how it risks their health, all hell will let loose.

Not even trained health professionals are truly aware of the bacterial contanimation in powdered infant formula and follow-on milk. The Gov can carry on hiding under the duvet all it likes - but it should ask itself how it's going to be represented in the future, when profit is taken out of the equation.

Any mother stuck using powdered infant formula because of the woeful lack of proper lactation support in this country, can find clear and scientifically researched advice on how to minimise the risks from bacteria in the powder, courtesy of the World Health Organisation.
http://www.who.int/f
oodsafety/publicatio
ns/micro/pif2007/en/


At least some health agencies have the sense of social and political responsibility lacking in our own Government and highly paid formula markateers. Profit before health: how old fashioned.

Isn't it interesting how many of our elected MPS and our Peers, are paid consultants for formula companies?
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login