LSD breakthrough for mental health patients Research unveils link between hallucinogen and psychotic delusions IT'S A hallucinogenic drug that was once hailed as a promising psychiatric therapy before being banned amid concerns over recreational use - now scientists believe LSD could hold the key to new drug treatments for illnesses such as schizophrenia.
A team of American researchers has discovered a biological link between LSD "acid trips" and psychotic delusions in the brain. Both states can cause hallucinations and feelings of disassociation from reality, and now scientists have uncovered what they share at a biochemical level. They say this could open the door to promising new drug treatments for psychotic illnesses such as schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, which is also known as manic depression.
LSD was first produced by Swiss chemist Albert Hofmann in 1938 and quickly became a therapeutic agent that appeared to show great promise. Between 1950 and 1965, the drug and other hallucinogens generated hundreds of scientific papers and were prescribed to more than 40,000 patients.
But it also became a popular recreational drug and by the late 1960s was outlawed around the world as a threat to public safety. In recent years, however, there has been renewed interest in the drug's therapeutic potential and in 2006, the Royal College of Psychiatrists discussed its use at its annual meeting for the first time in more than 30 years.
The new research hinges around a pair of receptors in the brain that bind together to form a functional complex.
Receptors are protein "locks" that trigger biological responses when the right shaped molecular "keys" latch on to them.
The receptor complex identified in the research switches on responses to drugs such as LSD, and psilocybin - the active ingredient in "magic mushrooms". It is also involved in schizophrenia.
One of the two receptors, mGluR2, reacts to glutamate and the other, 2AR, responds to serotonin. Both chemicals are neurotransmitters, which help to pass messages between nerves.
The receptors normally work together in a balanced way, said the scientists, who reported their findings in the online edition of the journal "Nature".
In brains removed from untreated schizophrenia patients, 2AR is over-active and mGluR2 under-active. The researchers believe this is a pattern that could predispose people to psychosis. Schizophrenic patients treated with newer anti-psychotic drugs such as Clozapine had brains in which the 2AR receptor was downregulated.
Hallucinations and delusions associated with psychosis usually reduce with age, which may be a reflection of reduced 2AR-mGluR2 activity as people get older, said the scientists.
The team, led by Dr Stuart Sealfon from New York's Mount Sinai School of Medicine, wrote: "These studies identify the 2AR-mGluR2 complex as a possible site of action of hallucinogenic drugs. The glutamate and serotonin systems have both been implicated in psychotic disorders, and the components of this complex are found to be differentially regulated in cortex from individuals with schizophrenia.
"Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the 2AR-mGluR2 complex integrates serotonin and glutamate signalling to regulate the sensory gating functions of the cortex - a process that is disrupted in psychosis."
The research has been welcomed by mental health campaigners. Marjorie Wallace, chief executive of charity SANE, said: "We hope these findings will create a better understanding of precisely how medications work on the brain and lead to direct improvements in the kinds of drug treatments available for people with psychosis.
"Currently, limitations in knowledge of how the drugs work mean that people given medication do not respond, doses may be too high, and the side effects can outweigh the benefits.
"Finding new drugs tailored to a person's individual biochemistry would mean that thousands of people with severe mental illness could look forward to a brighter future."
|
|

Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 6:30am Sun 24 Feb 08
Didn't everyone, apart from those affected in the head by the drug lobby, already know that?
Didn't everyone, apart from those affected in the head by the drug lobby, already know that?
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 6:30am Sun 24 Feb 08
Didn't everyone, apart from those affected in the head by the drug lobby, already know that?
Didn't everyone, apart from those affected in the head by the drug lobby, already know that?
Posted by: Tara Nelson, LAX on 8:52am Sun 24 Feb 08
How does this relate to Borderline Personality Disorder (Emotional Dysfunction Disorder) - which is much, much more prevalent than Bipolar Disorder?
How does this relate to Borderline Personality Disorder (Emotional Dysfunction Disorder) - which is much, much more prevalent than Bipolar Disorder?
Posted by: Scunnert, Travelling in Nihlon on 9:45am Sun 24 Feb 08
Drop out - Turn on - Tune in!
Drop out - Turn on - Tune in!
Posted by: George Hill, Denver on 10:28pm Sun 24 Feb 08
What about side-effects? Today's antipsychotic is tomorrow's street drug. LSD and cocaine were both administered for health. Will cocaine be re-introduced into the healthcare system?
What about side-effects? Today's antipsychotic is tomorrow's street drug. LSD and cocaine were both administered for health. Will cocaine be re-introduced into the healthcare system?
Posted by: George Hill, Denver on 10:45pm Sun 24 Feb 08
Using humans as guinea-pigs was meant to be outlawed over fifty years ago. What dangerous side-effects will be legalised or slip through the system this time?
Using humans as guinea-pigs was meant to be outlawed over fifty years ago. What dangerous side-effects will be legalised or slip through the system this time?
Posted by: Blair Anderson on 4:00am Mon 25 Feb 08
George Hill's cocaine straw man followed by the dreaded "what if it was legalised" neither asertion absent evidence accounts for the grotesque mess we call a prohibited 'management' strategy. What kind of management protocol delivers up all the problems it set out to eliminate? This is not management, it is politically induced mayhem with a veritable line up of vested interest stakeholders who profit from avoiding the scrutiny of a cost-benefit analysis. Managegment 101 stuff.
George Hill's cocaine straw man followed by the dreaded "what if it was legalised" neither asertion absent evidence accounts for the grotesque mess we call a prohibited 'management' strategy. What kind of management protocol delivers up all the problems it set out to eliminate? This is not management, it is politically induced mayhem with a veritable line up of vested interest stakeholders who profit from avoiding the scrutiny of a cost-benefit analysis. Managegment 101 stuff.
Posted by: Scunnert, Travelling in Nihlon on 5:36am Mon 25 Feb 08
tinyurl.com/27dclg
tinyurl.com/338ajs
tinyurl.com/2wynuf
tinyurl.com/27dclg
tinyurl.com/338ajs
tinyurl.com/2wynuf
Posted by: Rosalind Ainsworth, Bristol on 10:25am Mon 25 Feb 08
George Hill asks if cocaine will be re-introduced into the healthcare system. Have a look. It's already there. Today though, to avoid controversy, it's called "Ritalin" or "Concerta" and it's given to kids who according to psychiatrists, are mentally ill because their behaviour's bad. And it costs a fair old chunk of tax payers money to give these kids these drugs. Psychiatrists seem to want to "drug 'em up, and shut 'em up." Disgraceful!
George Hill asks if cocaine will be re-introduced into the healthcare system. Have a look. It's already there. Today though, to avoid controversy, it's called "Ritalin" or "Concerta" and it's given to kids who according to psychiatrists, are mentally ill because their behaviour's bad. And it costs a fair old chunk of tax payers money to give these kids these drugs. Psychiatrists seem to want to "drug 'em up, and shut 'em up." Disgraceful!
Posted by: Chris on 6:16pm Mon 25 Feb 08
LSD seemed to be a relatively successful treatment for alcoholism, before drug warrior hysteria put paid to clinical use.
Come to think of it, LSD may be less harmful than alcohol.
LSD seemed to be a relatively successful treatment for alcoholism, before drug warrior hysteria put paid to clinical use.
Come to think of it, LSD may be less harmful than alcohol.
Posted by: jim, USA on 8:06pm Mon 25 Feb 08
meh...LSD is less neurotoxic than aspirin. Those with freakout reactions are 1/2000. Same stat as those predisposed to mental illness. I used to eat LSD by the handful and its definitely less harmless than alcohol. Only the wankers who've never tried it get hysterical over it.[bold]bold[/bold]
meh...LSD is less neurotoxic than aspirin. Those with freakout reactions are 1/2000. Same stat as those predisposed to mental illness. I used to eat LSD by the handful and its definitely less harmless than alcohol. Only the wankers who've never tried it get hysterical over it.
Posted by: Mark S, Reno, NV on 8:50pm Mon 25 Feb 08
[bold][italic]Schizophrenia is an incredibly disabling illness. My 28 year old son has participated in trials before, and would gladly participate again. Why not be a guinea-pigs if it could lead to a life? Whatever it takes...[/italic][/bold]
Schizophrenia is an incredibly disabling illness. My 28 year old son has participated in trials before, and would gladly participate again. Why not be a guinea-pigs if it could lead to a life? Whatever it takes... Posted by: Mark S, Reno, NV on 9:05pm Mon 25 Feb 08
By the way, George Hill, the side effects of the current medications for schizophrenia are TD (Tardive Dyskinesia), a non reversible problem that causes them to lose control of their muscles, generally facial muscles, but it can be their legs and arms. Google Haloperidol and TD. The other so called "negative symptoms" of schizophrenia are bad too, such as not caring if you're sleeping in a pile of garbage and haven't washed in years, for example. Without willing guinea pigs there can't be the necessary tests that will eventually lead to solutions for both the positive and negative symptoms. The positive symptoms refer to hallucinations and dilutions, sometimes laced with extreme paranoia.
Jim from USA, that you took handfuls of LSD is not likely. I did a fair amount myself back in the sixties, living on the west coast where it was common. It can be a pretty powerful hallucinogenic if taken in quantities, as I’m sure you will agree. From my view, having experienced it years ago, the human mind shouldn’t be played with by amateur drug experimentalists. It would be nice to think that they may learn something about LSD after all this time. Too bad Dr. Leary isn’t here to hear it. If it weren’t for Dr. Leary, the perfect negative example of what recreational drugs can do to a great mind, we may already know now if it has serious medical usages.
By the way, George Hill, the side effects of the current medications for schizophrenia are TD (Tardive Dyskinesia), a non reversible problem that causes them to lose control of their muscles, generally facial muscles, but it can be their legs and arms. Google Haloperidol and TD. The other so called "negative symptoms" of schizophrenia are bad too, such as not caring if you're sleeping in a pile of garbage and haven't washed in years, for example. Without willing guinea pigs there can't be the necessary tests that will eventually lead to solutions for both the positive and negative symptoms. The positive symptoms refer to hallucinations and dilutions, sometimes laced with extreme paranoia.
Jim from USA, that you took handfuls of LSD is not likely. I did a fair amount myself back in the sixties, living on the west coast where it was common. It can be a pretty powerful hallucinogenic if taken in quantities, as I’m sure you will agree. From my view, having experienced it years ago, the human mind shouldn’t be played with by amateur drug experimentalists. It would be nice to think that they may learn something about LSD after all this time. Too bad Dr. Leary isn’t here to hear it. If it weren’t for Dr. Leary, the perfect negative example of what recreational drugs can do to a great mind, we may already know now if it has serious medical usages.
Posted by: Andrew E., Tampa, FL on 4:18am Tue 26 Feb 08
I have always believed that LSD had a strongly therapeutic application, and I think it is insulting that our government has decided to make it a Schedule 1 narcotic. It is not for everyone, but it [italic]is[/italic] for some of us.
Having taken a number of the consciousness expanding substances that have been available for the past 20 years, I am not surprised by the research. The unfortunately thing is that LSD and the various ergot derivatives have been lumped in with dangerous drugs and demonized in our culture.
Mark S while I agree with much of what you have said, look to the work of more reputable researches like Dr. Rick Strassman and Alexander and Ann Shulgin to learn more about the methodology and work being done today.
I have always believed that LSD had a strongly therapeutic application, and I think it is insulting that our government has decided to make it a Schedule 1 narcotic. It is not for everyone, but it
is for some of us.
Having taken a number of the consciousness expanding substances that have been available for the past 20 years, I am not surprised by the research. The unfortunately thing is that LSD and the various ergot derivatives have been lumped in with dangerous drugs and demonized in our culture.
Mark S while I agree with much of what you have said, look to the work of more reputable researches like Dr. Rick Strassman and Alexander and Ann Shulgin to learn more about the methodology and work being done today.
Posted by: Mark p.s., Montreal Canada on 7:50pm Tue 26 Feb 08
I say this science is faulty. Why? Anyone deemed schizophrenic and has died, has had a lifetime of medications to alter their brains. NOTE: I have the diagnosis of schizophrenia and take nothing but the occasional Ativan.
I say this science is faulty. Why? Anyone deemed schizophrenic and has died, has had a lifetime of medications to alter their brains. NOTE: I have the diagnosis of schizophrenia and take nothing but the occasional Ativan.
Posted by: Mercury, New Haven, CT on 8:40pm Tue 26 Feb 08
George--Cocaine is already prescribable. It is a topical anaesthetic available in 4% and 10% solutions. LSD was never prescribable, but was available for research under the brand name "Delysid".
Mark S--it is not fair to blame Timothy Leary for the current government crackdown on psychedelic drugs. Consider the following analogy: A prisoner in a concentration camp attacks a guard. In retaliation, the guards kill ten prisoners. Who is responsible for the deaths--the prisoner, or the guards? Let's assign responsibility where responsibility is due.
Mark p.s.--Good point, but not every schizophrenic is medicated. The difference between medicated and unmedicated schizophrenic brains is an area of active research.
George--Cocaine is already prescribable. It is a topical anaesthetic available in 4% and 10% solutions. LSD was never prescribable, but was available for research under the brand name "Delysid".
Mark S--it is not fair to blame Timothy Leary for the current government crackdown on psychedelic drugs. Consider the following analogy: A prisoner in a concentration camp attacks a guard. In retaliation, the guards kill ten prisoners. Who is responsible for the deaths--the prisoner, or the guards? Let's assign responsibility where responsibility is due.
Mark p.s.--Good point, but not every schizophrenic is medicated. The difference between medicated and unmedicated schizophrenic brains is an area of active research.
Posted by: doug l on 10:58pm Tue 26 Feb 08
If harm to the public was really the concern we pretend it to be as a reason for outlawing most recreational drugs, the first thing one would do is end the practice of throwing users into the inhuman and utterly barbaric institution that sadly is our prison system. Of course the real reason has more to do with obsessive need to control and fear of loosing it. We place anything that threatens that special relationship with the imaginary source of transcendent authority as "sin" though we call it by its trumped up name: crime. Could anything be more criminal than adamantly refusing to recognize that the victims here are often the ill? Shame on us. Drug use is rightfully an issue of public health, and should not be the domaine of ill-formed notions of acceptible behaviors despite their consensual and victimless nature.
If harm to the public was really the concern we pretend it to be as a reason for outlawing most recreational drugs, the first thing one would do is end the practice of throwing users into the inhuman and utterly barbaric institution that sadly is our prison system. Of course the real reason has more to do with obsessive need to control and fear of loosing it. We place anything that threatens that special relationship with the imaginary source of transcendent authority as "sin" though we call it by its trumped up name: crime. Could anything be more criminal than adamantly refusing to recognize that the victims here are often the ill? Shame on us. Drug use is rightfully an issue of public health, and should not be the domaine of ill-formed notions of acceptible behaviors despite their consensual and victimless nature.
Posted by: Mark p.s., Montreal Canada on 10:31am Wed 27 Feb 08
"not every schizophrenic is medicated"
Yes they are, the numbers of those who are not medicated are very small .
People might say I and others who don't take psych medications are/were misdiagnosed, and are/were not schizophrenic.
This is a logical error, in that those mental patients who are compliant to the psychiatrist( or can not have the choice to take medications or not), don't get a chance to escape the trap of being labeled schizophrenic and being unable to disprove the diagnosis scientifically with a lab test of some kind.
The diagnosis make the patient take medications, the medications over the lifetime change the patients chemically NORMAL brain.
If schizophrenia is anything , it may be a food allergy. For example stop eating wheat products, there then would be no need for a medicine to take for "schizophrenia".
http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/sites/entrez
?db=pubmed&cmd=Retri
eve&dopt=AbstractPlu
s&list_uids=9408073&
query_hl=1&itool=pub
med_docsum
"not every schizophrenic is medicated"
Yes they are, the numbers of those who are not medicated are very small .
People might say I and others who don't take psych medications are/were misdiagnosed, and are/were not schizophrenic.
This is a logical error, in that those mental patients who are compliant to the psychiatrist( or can not have the choice to take medications or not), don't get a chance to escape the trap of being labeled schizophrenic and being unable to disprove the diagnosis scientifically with a lab test of some kind.
The diagnosis make the patient take medications, the medications over the lifetime change the patients chemically NORMAL brain.
If schizophrenia is anything , it may be a food allergy. For example stop eating wheat products, there then would be no need for a medicine to take for "schizophrenia".
http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/sites/entrez
?db=pubmed&cmd=Retri
eve&dopt=AbstractPlu
s&list_uids=9408073&
query_hl=1&itool=pub
med_docsum
Posted by: Pathist, USA on 12:24pm Thu 28 Feb 08
I can see drugs like LSD and psilocybin being used once again in therapeutic psychiatry. Back in the day when the FDA didn't make it so hard to do studies with psychedelics LSD was one of the best treatments for alcoholism and alcoholism is usually self-medicating for depression.
Beyond individual psychiatric use I can see psychedelics making a comeback as spiritual sacrament. A recent scientific study done at Johns Hopkins University showed that psilocybin induced genuine spiritual experience in subjects. This combined with a recent ruling by the US Supreme Court allowing the religious use of hallucinogenic tea should open the door for entheogenic religions like Matrixism to bring back manna to religious experience. Many scholars believe that the manna spoken of in the Bible was flour from wheat that had been infected by ergot fungus which contains Lysergic Acid.
I can see drugs like LSD and psilocybin being used once again in therapeutic psychiatry. Back in the day when the FDA didn't make it so hard to do studies with psychedelics LSD was one of the best treatments for alcoholism and alcoholism is usually self-medicating for depression.
Beyond individual psychiatric use I can see psychedelics making a comeback as spiritual sacrament. A recent scientific study done at Johns Hopkins University showed that psilocybin induced genuine spiritual experience in subjects. This combined with a recent ruling by the US Supreme Court allowing the religious use of hallucinogenic tea should open the door for entheogenic religions like Matrixism to bring back manna to religious experience. Many scholars believe that the manna spoken of in the Bible was flour from wheat that had been infected by ergot fungus which contains Lysergic Acid.
Posted by: Thomas B. Roberts on 2:10pm Fri 29 Feb 08
For additional information on the medical uses of psychedelics, see "[italic]Psychedelic Medicine: New Evidence for Hallucinogens as Treatments[/italic] " (2007) edited by Michael Winkelman and myself. 2 volumes, Praeger/Greenwood.
For additional information on the medical uses of psychedelics, see "
Psychedelic Medicine: New Evidence for Hallucinogens as Treatments " (2007) edited by Michael Winkelman and myself. 2 volumes, Praeger/Greenwood.
Posted by: paige, mandeville,la. on 8:49pm Fri 29 Feb 08
would like to have daughter part in clinicals.no meds are working.[bold][italic]bold[/italic] [bold]bold[/bold] [/bold]
would like to have daughter part in clinicals.no meds are working.
bold Posted by: Tammy Nix, Nashville, TN on 12:55pm Sun 2 Mar 08
I know after everytime I have tripped in my life I have experienced a feeling of well being that could last up to a month.[italic]italic[/italic]
I know after everytime I have tripped in my life I have experienced a feeling of well being that could last up to a month.
Posted by: Suki, MA, USA on 8:08pm Sun 2 Mar 08
I have manic depression and it is carried in my genes. Both my children have had depression at times. My original diagnosis was unipolar (depression only). It was only after taking serzone, that I had my first manic episode. My son, while at college took lsd. The event was the stimulus for his first manic experience. Since then, he has stayed away from other mind altering drugs.
Just about all drugs are found in nature, but some are good and some are poisonous. I find that pot helps depression, where as alcohol can have a negative effect. Not all "natural drugs" are bad or good. I have been greatly helped by the new ssri's and mood stablizeres that are now on the market after trying to deal with my illness without proper medication for over 30 yrs. However, I am very sceptical about using lsd. The sad thing in this country is that a drug like alcohol is legal while pot is not. Alcohol use is often used by people as a self medicating for depression. Let's get the hard facts before we deem a substance good (legal) or bad (illegal). As it is brain chemicals that can cause these illnesses, I'm not sure that I would want to take even more altering drugs with this disease. Let's do our homework and get the facts straight before making public such statements as this one. In another 10 years, they will probably come to the conclusion that lsd is not safe to treat mental illness. Remember all the things that have been deemed bad for us, researchers reverse their opinions on them later on. Charcoal broiling food, sugar substitutes cause deaths in Rats? I take all the new research with a grain of salt these days!
I have manic depression and it is carried in my genes. Both my children have had depression at times. My original diagnosis was unipolar (depression only). It was only after taking serzone, that I had my first manic episode. My son, while at college took lsd. The event was the stimulus for his first manic experience. Since then, he has stayed away from other mind altering drugs.
Just about all drugs are found in nature, but some are good and some are poisonous. I find that pot helps depression, where as alcohol can have a negative effect. Not all "natural drugs" are bad or good. I have been greatly helped by the new ssri's and mood stablizeres that are now on the market after trying to deal with my illness without proper medication for over 30 yrs. However, I am very sceptical about using lsd. The sad thing in this country is that a drug like alcohol is legal while pot is not. Alcohol use is often used by people as a self medicating for depression. Let's get the hard facts before we deem a substance good (legal) or bad (illegal). As it is brain chemicals that can cause these illnesses, I'm not sure that I would want to take even more altering drugs with this disease. Let's do our homework and get the facts straight before making public such statements as this one. In another 10 years, they will probably come to the conclusion that lsd is not safe to treat mental illness. Remember all the things that have been deemed bad for us, researchers reverse their opinions on them later on. Charcoal broiling food, sugar substitutes cause deaths in Rats? I take all the new research with a grain of salt these days!
Posted by: mike, Fort Collins, Colorado on 12:48am Thu 6 Mar 08
I have used plenty of LSD and I think it has done a lot of good for me. It has opened numerous doors in my imagination and has contributed to the development of a creative personality. I have become extremely spiritual from my experiences with LSD, psylocibin mushrooms, and other hallucinogenic drugs. Here in the U.S. I've heard that the FDA is testing MDMA as a possible therapy aid for Iraq veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
I have used plenty of LSD and I think it has done a lot of good for me. It has opened numerous doors in my imagination and has contributed to the development of a creative personality. I have become extremely spiritual from my experiences with LSD, psylocibin mushrooms, and other hallucinogenic drugs. Here in the U.S. I've heard that the FDA is testing MDMA as a possible therapy aid for Iraq veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Posted by: Janice, bangor on 2:49am Mon 10 Mar 08
just reading the other comments. look it up. what do you think tylenol with codeine is made from? How about morphine? Of course LSD is one of the most potent chemicals known to man. IT is also known that LSD works as a serotonin agonist. Believe it or nor a person cannot OD on LSD, the reason people die from taking it are their action while on it, such as thinking they can fly or some other very high risk behavior. Maybe in very small doses it could help people, it can't be much worse than lots of the other phychotropic drugs on the market.
just reading the other comments. look it up. what do you think tylenol with codeine is made from? How about morphine? Of course LSD is one of the most potent chemicals known to man. IT is also known that LSD works as a serotonin agonist. Believe it or nor a person cannot OD on LSD, the reason people die from taking it are their action while on it, such as thinking they can fly or some other very high risk behavior. Maybe in very small doses it could help people, it can't be much worse than lots of the other phychotropic drugs on the market.
Posted by: penny, sanantonio on 3:19pm Wed 19 Mar 08
my friend is by-polar and cant get better with meds. he says the only time he was happy was when he took cocaine. he went to a new dr. and she told him she couldnt help him. i need some info to help please.
my friend is by-polar and cant get better with meds. he says the only time he was happy was when he took cocaine. he went to a new dr. and she told him she couldnt help him. i need some info to help please.
Posted by: Debbie S, Columbia, SC on 1:17am Tue 25 Mar 08
My husband suffered schizo affective disorder, with severe depression, halluciations and hearing voices. I observed his behavior during and after LSD use. While he may have appeared better, right after use; his symptoms worsened over the long run. He ultimately ended his own life. I believe LSD made his mental illness worse; and had no positive effect on him.
My husband suffered schizo affective disorder, with severe depression, halluciations and hearing voices. I observed his behavior during and after LSD use. While he may have appeared better, right after use; his symptoms worsened over the long run. He ultimately ended his own life. I believe LSD made his mental illness worse; and had no positive effect on him.
Posted by: Ken, Boulder on 12:56am Wed 9 Apr 08
LSD and other tryptamines tend to act on simmilar receptors. If you have a predisposition to certain types of schizophrenia, which is a term used by psychologists to lump together a set of symptoms caused by varying mental illnesses, you are more likely to have a negative experience, or have your condition worsened. That the receptors effected are the same is evidence for this worsening, not for improvement.
However, there are uses for tryptamines and phenethylamines in modern psychiatry. Some are saying we are entering the renaissance of pyschedelic research because it is becoming much more widespread. LSD (or possibly psilocybin I don't remember exactly) is being used to treat depression among cancer patients. MDMA is being used to treat PTSD in Isreal, Ibogaine is being used to treat alcoholism, John Hopkins did a follow up study to the good friday experiment (religious experience in a non religious setting among religious people).
There are currently still more restrictions on research than there was in the '60s which maybe isn't a bad thing since the studies being done now may hold a little bit more vallidity than some of what went on in the '60s. Although hopefully promising research can begin again in some of the coolest (in my opinion) areas, like creativity, religiousness, and some of the more "out there" things can be done as legitimate studies.
LSD and other tryptamines tend to act on simmilar receptors. If you have a predisposition to certain types of schizophrenia, which is a term used by psychologists to lump together a set of symptoms caused by varying mental illnesses, you are more likely to have a negative experience, or have your condition worsened. That the receptors effected are the same is evidence for this worsening, not for improvement.
However, there are uses for tryptamines and phenethylamines in modern psychiatry. Some are saying we are entering the renaissance of pyschedelic research because it is becoming much more widespread. LSD (or possibly psilocybin I don't remember exactly) is being used to treat depression among cancer patients. MDMA is being used to treat PTSD in Isreal, Ibogaine is being used to treat alcoholism, John Hopkins did a follow up study to the good friday experiment (religious experience in a non religious setting among religious people).
There are currently still more restrictions on research than there was in the '60s which maybe isn't a bad thing since the studies being done now may hold a little bit more vallidity than some of what went on in the '60s. Although hopefully promising research can begin again in some of the coolest (in my opinion) areas, like creativity, religiousness, and some of the more "out there" things can be done as legitimate studies.
Posted by: Lori on 4:09am Fri 2 May 08
These folks need to study this and get it done, we are interested in finding a fix for the problem! Also why not research some vitamins I know some of them are good for schizophrenia could'nt you all put them in one vitamin form of a pill that would be easier than taking 6or7 vitamins a day. Get to work we need some breakthroughs out there, I hear all the talk about the breakthroughs but want to see them in action. Thanks
These folks need to study this and get it done, we are interested in finding a fix for the problem! Also why not research some vitamins I know some of them are good for schizophrenia could'nt you all put them in one vitamin form of a pill that would be easier than taking 6or7 vitamins a day. Get to work we need some breakthroughs out there, I hear all the talk about the breakthroughs but want to see them in action. Thanks
Posted by: gordon mitchell, united states-texas on 7:17am Mon 5 May 08
[bold]LSD is not for everyone there is a link between lsd aswell as "magic mushrooms" and schitzophrenia and this THIS IS NOT BREAKING NEWS THEY HAVE KNOWN THIS FOR OVER 40 YEARS. THE FOUNDER OF LSD ALBERT HOFMANN DID RESEARCH OVER THIS TOPIC IN THE 60'S. CAN SOMEONE START READING AND GETTING EDUCATED? MY GOD WHOEVER WROTE THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE DUMBASS.[/bold]
LSD is not for everyone there is a link between lsd aswell as "magic mushrooms" and schitzophrenia and this THIS IS NOT BREAKING NEWS THEY HAVE KNOWN THIS FOR OVER 40 YEARS. THE FOUNDER OF LSD ALBERT HOFMANN DID RESEARCH OVER THIS TOPIC IN THE 60'S. CAN SOMEONE START READING AND GETTING EDUCATED? MY GOD WHOEVER WROTE THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE DUMBASS.