Home
September 05, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Alexander ditches Labour plan to raise school leaving age to 18
Leader scraps 2007 manifesto pledge to distance party from election failure.
By Paul Hutcheon, Scottish Political Editor

WENDY ALEXANDER has ditched her party's plan to raise the school leaving age to 18, the Sunday Herald can reveal.

The Labour leader has decided the policy, which was backed by her predecessor Jack McConnell and endorsed by Gordon Brown, will not be part of her education reform package. She instead favours giving school leavers a "guarantee" of a modern apprenticeship, or the right to a training place.

The move comes as Alexander prepares to stabilise her leadership at the Scottish Labour conference in Aviemore later this week.

Her short stint in the job has been overshadowed by the prolonged row over her accepting an illegal donation for her leadership campaign.

She admitted breaking the law by taking £950 from Jersey businessman Paul Green but hopes to recover by laying out plans for far-reaching internal party reform and policy development.

Alexander will this week publish a pamphlet, Change Is What We Do, which sets out her thinking on health, constitutional change and education.

In a briefing to journalists ahead of the conference, Alexander confirmed that raising the school leaving age to 18, one of Labour's flagship policies at the last Scottish election, has been dropped. "We are looking at it again," she said. "We think that the preferable way to go would be the guaranteed modern apprenticeship.

"We are firmly committed to the idea that it should not be possible to leave school and go on the dole, but not that you are compelled to stay on in a school environment."

The policy was heavily associated with McConnell, the former first minister, and is also backed by the UK government. Prime Minister Gordon Brown has personally endorsed raising the school leaving age and has attacked the SNP government for not backing it, saying: "It's important they recognise that other countries are moving forward on this so we should not be left behind."

Scrapping the policy allows Alexander to put distance between herself and McConnell, and will be shown as proof that she can pursue different policies to those enacted by Labour at Westminster.

Her own agenda includes giving headteachers more autonomy, funding one-to-one education for struggling pupils, backing the introduction of personal advisers for secondary school pupils, and creating a literacy commission.

The policy departure is further evidence that Alexander is ditching many of the policies once cherished by McConnell. She is known to be scathing about the state of the party left behind by McConnell when he quit as leader last August after the party's Holyrood election defeat in May.

A chunk of this week's conference will focus on Alexander's plan to overhaul the organisation of Scottish Labour, a task she believes has been neglected in the past. Central to her reform agenda will be the creation of three new bodies: an association of Labour councillors; an ethnic minorities taskforce; and a "liaison" committee including MSPs, MPs and other elected representatives.

Scottish Labour is also set to announce a new director of communications, who will work closely with three recently appointed party organisers.

Alexander used the briefing to suggest the donation scandal is behind her. "I have moved on and I think the news agenda has moved on," she said. Asked to comment on her party's big drop in poll ratings, she said: "It's been a hard few months for Labour."

An SNP spokesman said: "First of all, Wendy Alexander's leadership was marked by a fiddle, and now it seems to be descending into muddle and guddle.

Referring to Alexander's creation of a commission to look into increasing devolved power at Holyrood, he added: "This looks like a clumsy attempt to airbrush Jack McConnell out of the Labour picture, and create distance between Wendy and Gordon Brown - at the very time Downing Street has grabbed control of her commission and downgraded it to a London-led working party."

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Mrs I P Knightly on 10:32pm Sat 22 Mar 08
I am quite curios as to what a 'modern apprenticeship' is? Is it training to sit in a call-centre chained to the chair, being bullied by odious managers demanding unrealistic targets? Then the jobs to move to India. A little more meat on the bones please.
Posted by: wee folding bike on 10:37pm Sat 22 Mar 08
Deck chairs and Titanic come to mind.

Wendy is the Violet Jessop of politics.
Posted by: Observer on 10:43pm Sat 22 Mar 08
No moles leaking anything juicy this week Paul ? Who cares if they have dropped a daft manifesto pledge when they are not in a position to implement it ? I hope you haven't dropped getting the truth out of the electoral commission that is much more important than this nonsense.










Posted by: karin on 10:50pm Sat 22 Mar 08
paul hutcheon

are you married?

paul go on make a blog pleeeeeese.


anyway back to pauls wonderful article.

so wendy has dropped a manifesto pledge how dare she.

now back to paul.

paul do you have blue eyes or brown eyes.

Do you have an official fan club.

If not would you like me to start one?
Posted by: Observer on 11:00pm Sat 22 Mar 08
Karin he was on the telly a while back I can't remember what programme he was on, he is not Johnny Depp but you can't have everything.
Posted by: spotted on 11:16pm Sat 22 Mar 08
sounds like bwoken pwomithes from Wendy
Posted by: bully wee alba, Edinburgh on 12:03am Sun 23 Mar 08
“Change is what we do!”

You give us £1,000, and we will give you £50.00 change!

See, this is what we do!
Posted by: Thyme Kelpie on 12:03am Sun 23 Mar 08
So what?

Have Wendy's lot ever really implemented anything by themselves in the lifetime of the Scottish Parliament?

Even free personal care was led by the Lib dems.
Posted by: megz, glasgow on 12:05am Sun 23 Mar 08
lol Karin can i join the club?
Posted by: Jimbo on 12:58am Sun 23 Mar 08
Labour having looked at their education policy and found it wanting have decided on a new policy. What's wrong with that? Nothing that I can see. McConnell's policy was obviously a way of massaging the unemployment statistics.

What they haven't done is is put any flesh on the bones of their new policy and explained firstly what they mean exactly by modern apprenticeships, secondly where are all these apprenticeships going to come from and finally, what guarantees anyone has of a job on completion of their apprenticeship.

Instead of the remark from the SNP spokesman:
"First of all, Wendy Alexander's leadership was marked by a fiddle, and now it seems to be descending into muddle and guddle.


I would have much preferred something along the lines of 'Labour have changed their education policy. It is now up to Labour to present a bill on this to Parliament, Parliament can then vote on the merits of said bill.'

It looks like we're in for a tit for tat on broken promises. I really wish the SNP spokesman had applied grown up politics and shown Labour how it's done.

Posted by: doonhamer on 2:21am Sun 23 Mar 08
more bwoken pwomethes from Labour..
Posted by: Bob, Edinburgh on 7:05am Sun 23 Mar 08
"An SNP spokesman said: "First of all, Wendy Alexander's leadership was marked by a fiddle, and now it seems to be descending into muddle and guddle."

A truly depressing response from the SNP spokesperson to a very sensible change of position by Wendy Alexander. Why is it so difficult for the government to acknowledge when Wendy Alexander does something right? Heaven knows it's rare enough.
Posted by: The Stig, Motherwell on 8:07am Sun 23 Mar 08
Wendy Alexander and doing something right in the same sentence - surely the ultimate oxymoron - come on please where have you been for the last few months - the only change in Wendy and the new Liebour lot - is moving from a habitual liar to a pathological liar.
Posted by: Big eye, Paisley on 8:51am Sun 23 Mar 08
I think this article has come too early.

I would have preferred another few years of Labour's moans about SNP Broken promises and THEN the SNP producing a comparison about how many SNP promises have been kept in comparison with the contents of the Labour manifesto.

Intellectual Wendy of course, when devising this strategy, didn't realise she was setting her Party up for another big fall

The public realise that the SNP as a MINORITY Government can't get everything implemented but will never forgive the negativity of a pathetic Labour opposition that seems incapable of getting anything done!
Posted by: dave, north on 8:54am Sun 23 Mar 08
change is what we do?labour has had years to change things,but done nothing.
time to change to an independent scotland!
Posted by: Wardog, Buckie on 9:03am Sun 23 Mar 08
Bob wrote:
\"An SNP spokesman said: \"First of all, Wendy Alexander\'s leadership was marked by a fiddle, and now it seems to be descending into muddle and guddle.\"

A truly depressing response from the SNP spokesperson to a very sensible change of position by Wendy Alexander. Why is it so difficult for the government to acknowledge when Wendy Alexander does something right? Heaven knows it\'s rare enough.
I'm assuming that you are joking, she hasn't done anything positive yet!....the story is about the spin of the spin she is about to foist on her party......

Labour have got a massive job ahead to claw back any votes, these 'new' policies are just regurgitated policies revised to airbrush Jack Mcconnell.

The Alexander Twins and Broon refuse to believe that the reason their vote evaporated was their negative message regarding Scotland.... a strategy pushed by Douglas and Broon on every visit to Scotland.

Next week will indeed be interesting.


LABOUR: PREPARING for ANOTHER 4 YEARS in OPPOSITIION

Posted by: dave, north on 9:15am Sun 23 Mar 08
Does anyone have info on the current finances of the labour party?how many "activists" will they be able to afford come the next election?
Posted by: Frank McBride, lusitania on 9:32am Sun 23 Mar 08
#Bob.

Was this NEW policy not in NuLab's Budget ammendment?

Wasn't this ammendment accepted by the SG?

Did NuLab not then abstain in the Budget vote?

Pray tell us, what would be a reasonable comment on this method of politicking?
Posted by: carlung, Haddington on 9:38am Sun 23 Mar 08
Wendy said:

"We are firmly committed to the idea that it should be possible to leave school and go on the dole, and not be compelled to stay on in school.

This has been labour policy for decades, as generations of "benefit babies" will attest. By providing generous hand-outs, Scottish Labour will certainly be returned to power at the next election.

We pledge to increase all benefits over and above inflation.

We pledge to destroy private schools, private health, private enterprise.

All housing will be taken into public ownership.

Only labour Party members will be allowed to have cars.

And remember our hero Stalin's famous remark "the nail that sticks up will be hammered down".

Posted by: Duns Scotus, The Borders on 9:50am Sun 23 Mar 08
Dave @ 9:15 am
This from the SCOTTISH Labour Party website. The don't say how much a peerage costs.
Here are a few examples of how your money will make a real difference:

£15 – The cost of 1000 campaign leaflets
£50 – Phone calls to a street of voters in a key seat
£100 – Send 250 letters to undecided voters
£250 – The cost of 5000 membership forms
£500 – Send a personalised Birthday card to every 18 year-old in a key constituency
£1000 – Pay for a ward’s campaigning in vital elections, and entitles you to join the Labour Party’s Thousand Club

The Labour Party may contact you using the information you supply. If you do not wish to be contacted, please write to the Communications Unit at The Labour Party, Eldon House, Regent Centre, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE3 3PW. Privacy policy.


Change is what they do indeed! Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. This phrase was famously used by Charlie Gordon when he went begging for £1,000 donations. He thought it meant "Plus ye get change an ye kin choose whit name it goes under ."
Posted by: sceptic sid on 10:10am Sun 23 Mar 08
morning all : bit of a non story, because as we all know it doesn't matter what the labour party say they will do, they never deliver.the sad bit is how long it took everyone to wake up.ms alexander can moan all she likes about the state of her party but thats what happens when we finally crack the one party state. ps well done henry now that may be a story.
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 10:50am Sun 23 Mar 08
They should be done under the Trades Description Act, for ca;ling themselves "Scottish" and Labour".
Posted by: Oscar on 11:05am Sun 23 Mar 08
Shouldn't the pamphlet read "Resisting Change Is What We Do"?
Posted by: Peter Thomson, Atheists have more fun! on 11:11am Sun 23 Mar 08
The only way Wendy will help Labour in Scotland to recover is:

1. Drop all pretences that 'Labour in Scotland' have any say in their policies for Scotland
2. Resign
3. Ask for donations at a £1,000 a time to set up an organisation to help Labour MP's in Scotland understand their P45's after the next general election and what it means to be unemployable........
.
Posted by: John Leven on 11:14am Sun 23 Mar 08
Jimbo

A "modern apprenticeship" is where you sit in a classroom and are filled with theory.

A real apprenticeship is where you work alongside a competent tradesman and he passes on his skills, I know which one produces real tradesmen.

On another post I suggested scrapping Scottish lack of Enterprise. You could then give local business and councils say £3000 per year for the four year apprenticeship of each one they employ.

We could then produce our own trades men and not need to import so may people from abroad.

P.S. There has never been any guarantee of a permanent job at the end of an apprenticeship, the companies only keep the good ones, which is how it should be.
Posted by: JoeMcT, BlairsFantasyIsland on 11:44am Sun 23 Mar 08
Why not raise the leaving age to 65 and thereby cut Unemployment to Zero?
Posted by: JoeMcT, BlairsFantasyIsland on 11:48am Sun 23 Mar 08
Change Is What We Do

Yep, and EVERYTHING they attempt to change leads to DISASTER whether it is invading Iraq, de-classifying Cannabis, 24 hour drinking or letting in over 2 million Immigrants.

Oh, and strangely enough, none of the above ever got a mention in Labour's election manifestos?

Gee, can't think why.....
Posted by: a tradesman on 12:33pm Sun 23 Mar 08
A "modern apprenticeship" is where you sit in a classroom and are filled with theory.

A real apprenticeship is where you work alongside a competent tradesman and he passes on his skills, I know which one produces real tradesmen.

On another post I suggested scrapping Scottish lack of Enterprise. You could then give local business and councils say £3000 per year for the four year apprenticeship of each one they employ.

We could then produce our own trades men and not need to import so may people from abroad.

P.S. There has never been any guarantee of a permanent job at the end of an apprenticeship, the companies only keep the good ones, which is how it should be
.


Have a read of Park's bill that is pretty much what is suggests
Posted by: Curley Bill, the SW on 12:43pm Sun 23 Mar 08
This Wendy idiot has had more re-launches than the Space Shuttle!
Posted by: Jwil, Lanarkshire on 1:53pm Sun 23 Mar 08
"We think that the preferable way to go would be the guaranteed modern apprenticeship.

Sounds pretty er.. er... definate then!
Posted by: Jwil, Lanarkshire on 1:54pm Sun 23 Mar 08
Speeling! definite
Posted by: carlung, Haddington on 2:00pm Sun 23 Mar 08
McLeish says "Independence no bad thing"
The news is likely to overshadow this week’s Scottish Labour Party conference in Aviemore, where Scottish parliamentary leader Wendy Alexander will try to convince delegates to support the transfer of more powers from Westminster to Holyrood, while allowing other powers to be returned from Holyrood to Westminster.
Mair farce from he Slabs!
Posted by: DougtheDug on 2:06pm Sun 23 Mar 08
"The move comes as Alexander prepares to stabilise her leadership..."

I take it this is referring to her leadership of the Labour MSP's in the Scottish Parliament and is not a reference to the non-existent leader of the much quoted but mythical, "Scottish Labour Party".

"A chunk of this week's conference will focus on Alexander's plan to overhaul the organisation of Scottish Labour"

Ms. Alexander can plan all she wants, but to change the organisational structure of the British Labour party would need someone with much more power than the group leader of the Labour MSP's in Holyrood.

This article seems to assume that Ms. Alexander actually holds an important position in the British Labour party. Check out the Labour in Scotland website. Her only official position as far as that is concerned is as a member of the, "Scottish Parliamentary Labour Group", on the Scottish Executive Committee.
http://www.scottishl
abour.org.uk/sec

It's amusing to see that the endless media references to her as, "Leader", have made Ms. Alexander believe that she is someone of importance within the Labour organisation.

Ms. Alexander launched her "Constitutional Convention", with a great fanfare but at an important meeting on the 28th of January to discuss the way forward for the convention Labour failed to invite her along. Only Gordon Brown, Alastair Darling, Jack Straw, and Des Browne were there to discuss the Constitutional Convention for Scotland.

Ms. Alexander is not very important within the British Labour party and promoted well beyond her competence.
Posted by: Wardog, Buckie on 3:11pm Sun 23 Mar 08

Great, a scheme for 60,000 people costing £100 million, no compulsion on any employer to provide the apprenticeships and by Wendy's reckoning, it will be large scale public infrastructure projects (she includes Govan's Shipyards in this) that will make the places......

MORE STATE INTERVENTION AND CENTRALISATION

No thanks Wendy.... how about simply growing our economy you numpty to make apprenticeships available, something that you specifically and your party has had a dismal record at for over 10 years here in Scotland....

What else has your policy 'think tank' came up with?

Posted by: Wardog, Buckie on 4:10pm Sun 23 Mar 08
SCOTTISH LABOUR'S 'VISION'
http://news.bbc.co.u
k/1/shared/bsp/hi/pd
fs/21_03_08_wendy.pd
f

Here are the main points from her proposals, published in a major new policy document:

* Scottish Labour has no divine right to be elected and must work hard to win back support.

* Find a clear way to meet people's hopes and aspirations, without being deflected by false voices of opposition.

* Reach out to win backing from those who have never supported Labour.

* Scottish Labour still stands for the progressive values of justice, equality and community.

* Policies must be constantly renewed to stay in touch with changes in society.

* More personalised services from the NHS.

* Maintain pressure to ensure pupils are taught in modern buildings, but look beyond a bricks and mortar programme.

* Seek ways to guarantee all children leave primary school fully equipped for a secondary education.

* Move away from the fixation on school class sizes and look at quality teaching.

* More progress to help university entrants who genuinely cannot afford higher education.

* Engage seriously with the constitutional challenge thrown down by the SNP.

* Constitutional commission should consider both more powers for Holyrood and handing some back to Westminster.

* Consider devolving powers in areas such as welfare, work, transport and some aspects of VAT, while handing back powers, possibly in counter terrorism and contingency planning.

* It is wrong to present the Union as one in which Scotland has only benefited and not given.
Posted by: Lowperdowg, Norway on 5:10pm Sun 23 Mar 08
Wardog

The last one is a beezer!
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login