Home
October 10, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Majority of Scots values Scotland’s wild places and wants action to protect them
Agency delighted by positive public response
By Rob Edwards, Environment Editor

IT'S WILD, it's out there and it matters to almost everybody, even if they hardly ever see it. Scotland's remote and untamed mountains, moors and glens have been given overwhelming backing in a major new poll for the conservation agency, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH).

Over 90% of people interviewed said they thought it important for Scotland to have wild places. Of the 1304 who were questioned, only six suggested wild land was not important.

More than 60% of Scottish residents said that action was needed to protect wild areas from being damaged by modern buildings, bulldozed tracks, mobile phone masts, electricity pylons or wind turbines. About 50% thought that wild places were under threat.

The strength of support for wild land has surprised SNH, and delighted campaigners. "In the past people who were interested in wild land have been called elitist, and it has been seen as a specialist interest of a minority of people," said James Fenton, SNH's landscape policy officer.

But that idea had now been firmly knocked on the head because the survey showed that wild land was vital to the vast majority of people, including those living in the central belt. "It's part of the cultural identity of Scotland," argued Fenton.

However, there was a danger that it was being lost by attrition. "A bulldozed track here, a mast there, a building there and a wind turbine there - there are little things eating away at the edge," he said.

Those questioned said that wild land was important for wildlife, for tourism and for the local economy. People also suggested that it "contributed to their own health and wellbeing, enabling them, when visiting, to be relaxed, calm, content and at peace."

According to SNH, up to a fifth of the Highlands and Islands could be regarded as wild land, though this depends on how it is defined (see map above). The presence of footpaths, forestry plantations and old stone buildings don't necessarily prevent land from being perceived as wild.

For Davie Black, the wild land campaign officer with Ramblers' Association Scotland, the survey confirmed what he had long believed.

"Whether people have actually been there or not, the fact that there are areas of land that have been only lightly touched by human hand resonates strongly in the Scottish psyche," he said.

"The challenge is how to develop policies which value not just the remote aspect of wild land, but our perceptions of it. Just turning a hillside corner with a wide, open view, or a secluded stretch of coastline, can give one that elemental feel of wildness."

Wild land was a "scarce and diminishing resource" which needed better protection, Black argued. "The current public inquiry for a wind farm at Eisgen in Lewis, which is wild land and a National Scenic Area, will be a test of how these landscape qualities are valued."

The survey was conducted by Market Research Partners in August and September 2007, and a report on it is due to be published by SNH in the next few weeks. It involved face-to-face interviews with 1004 people across Scotland plus 300 residents in the Cairngorms National Park.

The park authority, which commissioned the research alongside SNH, was similarly pleased with the outcome. "We often refer to the Cairngorms National Park as a living and working landscape with wild land at its heart," said Will Boyd-Wallis, the authority's senior land management officer.

"The public perceptions survey confirms the fact that many, many people enjoy and value the wildness that can be found in our beautiful native forests, moors and mountains. Our job now is to ensure that all agencies, non-governmental organisations, land managers and the public work together to ensure this great asset is protected and enhanced for future generations."

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Lobeydosser, Woodlands Road on 5:38am Sun 18 May 08
Scotlnd is a fantasticaly beautiful place; just do some hill walking now and you will see.

Please keep the wild places wild, although some more subtle and sympathetic car parking areas could be build with some reasonable facilities (toilet, rubbish collections, etc.) Examples of this are at Rowardennan (not bad but could be updated) or Glen Affric (car parking but nothing else)Access could also be improved with better public transport.

Another thing we should be considering is tree planting; a reason many ares are so desolate is that all the trees were cut down for making iron or for wooden ships and not replaced.
Posted by: WestHighlander, West Highalnds on 8:28am Sun 18 May 08
Should anyone be surprised at this result? I would have thought it was stating the obvious. And of course SNH are delighted, it's just more ammo with which they and all the rest of the conservation body parasites continue to justify their increasingly bloated existences.
Posted by: McSomeone, Scotland on 9:18am Sun 18 May 08
Absolutely right, stop it now before it starts otherwise we will lose vast amounts of country to urban development and or second homes just as they are/have in many parts of England.
Posted by: wullie on 6:00pm Sun 18 May 08
Ah time for another bloated Public Sector Quango to manage and improve our quality of life.

Filled with Labour placemen and women these organisations have tradionally provided sinecures for many.

Indeed, take a train or drive to Balloch and look over the new multi million pound National Park Headquarters.

This employs nearly 150 administrators who are needed to manage the park.

Take a further walk down to the new slipway and further administration building on the shore of the loch at Drumkinnon bay and marvel at the number of new ranger vans and vehicles parked up in the car park on a daily basis.

Boats, yes, the park Authority have these too but they do a good job.

Now, can we put a guess on how much this National Park Authority cost to run per year?
Posted by: Iain MacKinnon, from Skye on 12:41am Mon 19 May 08
The key to this press release is the SNH spokesman claiming that their survey shows they have the support of the majority of people in the Central Belt in their efforts to protect wild land. Yet where do SNH choose to focus their attentions in protecting wild land? On "the Highlands and Islands", of which "up to a fifth could be regarded as wild land".

My suspicion is that this is SNH striking back after being hauled over the coals for its intransigence last year in stubbornly opposing a three turbine community owned wind farm on North Harris. This was because it was to be near a National Scenic Area. The wind turbines will transform the fortunes of the North Harris community where lack of economic opportunities has led to massive ongoing depopulation. Such was the anger in the Highlands and Islands that Heriot Watt University were asked to look at SNH's record in planning matters and their conclusion was that they should become involved in a lot fewer cases.

That should have been that. However, control of SNH is partially in the hands of environmental lobby organisations based in the central belt whose members don't want, as the SNH spokesman put it, "A bulldozed track here, a mast there, a building there and a wind turbine there" when they come to visit the Highlands and Islands for a day or two. The result of their aesthetic discrimination (a word chosen with care - the actions of SNH have been described as environmental colonialism) has been to hinder the fragile human community of places like North Harris, Assynt and Inverasdale, where community development workers (often volunteers) can be forced to deal with their obstructionism.

By all means oppose the Eisgen windfarm if the community there are with you, SNH - but no more of your nonsense in stubbornly opposing smallscale community led developments.



Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login