Home
October 12, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Sturgeon to end privatisation of GP practices
Policy change after Sunday Herald breaks story
By Paul Hutcheon, Scottish Political Editor

HEALTH MINISTER Nicola Sturgeon is planning to close a legal loophole that allows private companies to run GP practices.

The Glasgow MSP is looking for an early legislative opportunity to ensure that only traditional providers can run local health services.

She is also unlikely to provide more public funding next year for an independent treatment centre in Strathcaro, Tayside, a further sign of the minister's hostility to private sector involvement in the NHS.

Legislation introduced by the last Labour-Liberal Democrat Scottish Executive made it possible for companies to take over vacant GP practices.

Jack McConnell's administration was criticised in 2006 after it emerged that Serco, a global services firm, was bidding to run a GP practice in Harthill, North Lanarkshire.

The pitch was unsuccessful, but the tender alarmed NHS campaigners, who claimed the health service was wide open to privatisation.

Another GP practice, this time in East Kilbride, was dissolved recently and could result in a private operator moving into the area.

The developments, revealed by the Sunday Herald in March, prompted 20 GPs to write an open letter earlier this year to Sturgeon, as new health minister, calling for action: "We oppose privatisation because it has no good evidence of providing high-quality care for whole populations as opposed to selected profitable patients.

"We ask you to make the necessary changes to the relevant legislation to underwrite your guarantee of no privatisation' of GP services in Scotland."

Sturgeon is now committed to plugging the legal gap, and will look for a slot in the legislative programme this autumn.

A source close to the deputy first minister said: "We are sympathetic to closing the loophole, and we are hopeful of finding a legislative vehicle for it."

The Sunday Herald also understands Sturgeon is not likely to give any further taxpayers' money to the independent treatment centre in Strathcaro, Tayside.

The private centre provides services for NHS patients, but the health minister believes future funding should be kept inside the health service, as opposed to diverting it to the independent sector.

In a speech last year, she said: "I am going to very specifically reject any more taxpayer-funded expansion of the private sector, which is obviously taking a very different view to what is happening south of the border.

"Our approach will be to build NHS capacity. I do not see the stimulation of private-sector competition as being in the interests of the health service."

A spokesman for the Scottish government said: "We have made clear our commitment to an NHS rooted firmly in the public sector. Our strategy for health, Better Health Better Care, sets out to pursue an investment strategy that builds public sector services supported by the use of the voluntary sector and the social economy."

A spokesman for trade union Unison said: "We would welcome any plan to stop private firms cashing in on GP surgeries, something Unison argued against when the legislation was first introduced. "We urge the cabinet secretary to plug this gap as soon as possible."

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: fifer on 7:33am Sun 8 Jun 08
maybe I could get an appointment quicker than 2 weeks away if it was private.
Posted by: Mike MacKinnon on 7:36am Sun 8 Jun 08
A gap created by the right wing, Thatcherite NL! And still people vote for these scum?

C'mon PtbS and all the other unionist hee haw merchants. Tell us why this was a good idea!
Posted by: robert, Scotland on 7:52am Sun 8 Jun 08
Another great move by the SNP.
Wee joke Mcdonnell hang your thick labour head is shame.
Posted by: Wattie, Renrew on 11:29am Sun 8 Jun 08
Hope you do close this loophole Nicola. It will give me greater reason to vote SNP at the next election.
Posted by: JC on 6:26pm Sun 8 Jun 08
There was never much enthusiasm for corporate businesses running hospitals and GP practices amongst the previous administration.
As for the proposed closing of a loophole- let's wait and see what the nats do as oppose what they say they are 'sympathetic' to do. If they were that committed to closing the loophole, they would give a clear and unambiguous statement, not have 'sources' only making the right noises
Posted by: CJ on 10:28pm Sun 8 Jun 08
It is great to hear Nicola saying this. England and certain parts of Scotland are more keen than others on getting the private sector involved in running health services. If private companies run GP practices it will lead to the break up of the NHS. It may not be perfect now, but it will get a lot worse under private companies and once the NHS has gone we will never get it back. I guarantee that anyone moaning about the NHS now will eat their words once the private companies take over, unless they can afford to top up their private health insurance. The SNP must be applauded for this and encouraged to turn their sympathy for closing the loophole into action.
Posted by: Digory, Narnia Scotland on 12:06am Mon 9 Jun 08

What is superior about forcing people into Social/Voluntary Care so that State Employees have total control of their lives?

They buy in private care why should they have the right to interfere with other people's Operations etc?

Why should NHS Doctors and other organisations be able to claim Charitable Status for supplying Services which Families pay Tax on?






Posted by: Digory, Narnia Scotland on 12:18am Mon 9 Jun 08

They do not have to demonstrate a Public

Benefit their Status is guaranteed and

automatic irrespective of the outcome.

Posted by: CentreScot, West Lothian on 10:43pm Sat 14 Jun 08
Batter to mix private and state. Send NHS patients to private sector when in their interest and treat private patients in currently NHS premises when that is in their interest. Income generator for NHS and likely to kick standards up all round.
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login