Home
October 08, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
My warning to Britain: your democracy is under attack from Putin's KGB infiltrators
EXCLUSIVE: A former Soviet spymaster writes for the Sunday Herald

THE LATE ALEXANDER LITVINENKO once spoke to me about Putin's strategic plan for damaging Western democracy and reducing it to the level of what passes for democracy in Russia. I believe that this plan is already being successfully accomplished. For proof, just look at how all Western leaders are today happy to close their eyes on Russia's deviation from democracy - by doing so they are taking the first steps toward ruining democracy in their own countries.

Russian agents have a stranglehold on the UK because Putin has modernised the Russian concept of intelligence. Now they are putting emphasis on the use of Russian emigrants and not on the use of leftist or liberal Western intellectuals, whom Lenin once cynically described as his "useful idiots". Though a lot of KGB officers still hark fondly back to the days of Stalinism, they would never dare to recruit a British intellectual today because they know that your intellectuals would believe that Russia has finished with Communism. That is not the case at all.

MI5 says that the number of Russian spies in the embassy and affiliated institutions is about 30, around the same number as it was in the Soviet times. In fact, it is much larger. In the Soviet period the number of vacancies for KGB and GRU agents in the Soviet embassies was strictly restricted by the Central Committee of the Communist Party. Today though, Russian intelligence does not suffer restrictions. The KGB's privileged position in Russia gives it unrestricted freedom to operate all over the world. British intelligence is deprived of such a privilege.

The number of Russian intelligence officers in the UK exceeds 30 people many times over. Litvinenko described to me a new KGB recruitment method in the UK. The Russian businessman is approached in the street with the suggestion that he become a spy. He, of course, declines. Then the agent says to him, with a sly smile: "Well then, we will put out a search for you on Interpol. We'll lie to them about you being a member of the Russian mafia. We'll see what happens to your business then!" The unfortunate businessman gives in. He already knows how pitilessly his colleagues are treated in Russia, and that Putin does, indeed, use Interpol in his fight with his political enemies.

Also, a lot of Russian spies are coming to the UK as clergymen after "the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia" was merged with the Kremlin-controlled Moscow Patriarchate in May 2007.

What should the UK do about all this? Increase their spy missions in Russia? I am afraid it is too late for that. People are already afraid to contact Britons or British institutions for fear of being accused of espionage. As the FSB (the successor to the KGB) now doesn't need to hamper itself with the search for proof, it is possible to declare anybody a British spy. Once that happens the person will go to prison for 15 years, as has already happened to Igor Sutyagin and many other Russian intellectuals. On the other hand, North Korean intelligence is allowed to work in Russia openly. They are friends. You, the British, are not.

It is better for the UK to get realistic, and rid itself of its illusions about Russian democracy. The UK must treat Russia as a non-democratic state; it must require the expulsion of Russia from the G8, with which Russia does not share any common values. The UK must also start expelling diplomats just as you did in Soviet times because Russia is now harking back to that era as well.

MI5 has complained of swarms of spies from Russia and China roaming around Britain. I suspect the two countries may be working together. As a former adviser on China to General Zaitsev, head of the KGB Scientific and Technical Intelligence, I have a strong feeling that the intelligence services of Russia and China have resumed their co-operation in spying on the West. The heads of Chinese intelligence and counter-intelligence visit Moscow every month. What for, I wonder?

In our long phone conversations, Litvinenko told me, with a smile in his voice, that Putin wanted to kill him. He knew that Putin was vindictive and did not forgive insults or those who gave away personal revelations about him. Litvinenko said he still had his sources and informants in Moscow. It was a claim that was to turn out fatal for him.

When I spoke on CNN a few days after Litvinenko's murder, the interviewer wondered: "Why are you sure it was Putin? Why not anybody else?"

It was a question put by a man who had been brought up in a democratic society, where the state's intelligence apparatus are civil bodies in which officers are allowed a degree of freedom in their political views. The KGB is a military body. It is a part of Russia's military bloc, and it is subordinate to the Supreme Commander of the Russian Army - former Comrade President Vladimir Putin. As such any uninvited intruder into the sphere of Putin's personal power can expect to be severely punished.

We should also note that Andrei Lugovoy, Litvinenko's alleged murderer, was promoted to the Russian parliament. What other proof of Putin's involvement does one need?

P utin is not afraid of the West anymore. More importantly, the West is afraid of him. All the Western leaders want to be Putin's friends. They are all in his pocket. Making Lugovoy a parliament member is not only an insult to the UK, it is the beginning of his cruel revenge towards Britain. His revenge may well continue to damage British interests all over the world. Putin is not afraid of the consequences; he is sure that the West will forgive him everything because of Russia's oil supply.

Can Putin order his agents among Islamic terrorist cells to create acts of sabotage in the UK? He's already probably ordered them to do the same thing in certain Russian cities. It's strange that the West still considers Russia its ally in fighting world terrorism when terrorism as a concept was initially invented in the KGB's headquarters as a tool of world Communist revolution. Terrorism is a part of Communist ideology. That is why, as Litvinenko used to tell me, that terrorism in Northern Ireland faded as soon as the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991: the paramilitaries stopped getting support from Moscow.

The very problem of world terrorism had also faded until the KGB regained power in Russia in the mid-1990s. That is why, according to Litvinenko, all the leading world terrorists have been KGB agents, like Carlos the Jackal. Even al-Qaeda's two leading figures, Ayman Al-Zawahiri and Juma Namangani, are KGB agents. In 1996, Litvinenko secured the secret arrival of Al-Zawahiri in Dagestan in the Northern Caucasus in Russia to be trained by FSB instructors. Namangani was once a student of the Saboteur Training Centre of the KGB's First Chief Directorate in 1989-91. Litvinenko's friend saw him there.

Russian intelligence is using Islamic terrorism all over the world. Now it is trying to prevent any easing of tension in the Middle East in order to keep the price of oil high for the Kremlin's coffers.

Konstantin Preobrazensky's latest book is The KGB's New Trojan Horse: Americans of Russian Descent.

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Volk, Unknown on 3:37am Sun 13 Jul 08
This is the stupidest article i have come across. Wonderful piece of Anti-Russia Propaganda.
Posted by: donald, glasgow on 6:30am Sun 13 Jul 08
Nothing compared to the damage done to Scotland by British spies.
Posted by: Tommy's Friend, USA on 6:48am Sun 13 Jul 08
Russia is not a democracy, and it should not be treated as an ally because it is not a friend of the western democracies and does not share our values. Inviting the Russians to become a member of the G-8 was a strategic mistake. However, I doubt that the Russians are supporting Islamic terrorism. If they are, they are playing with fire. Our policy toward Russia should be much as it was during the later part of the Cold War, coexistence. The best way to protect our democratic societies is to become less energy dependent on Russia, and to protect our democratic values at home. The perceived threat of Islamic terrorism has already produced an erosion of individual freedom in the United States and in European Countries.
Posted by: tch, Greece on 8:40am Sun 13 Jul 08
Greek PM is making all the same mistakes, sucking up to Putin imagining that the horrible
Russian runt is honest broker.
Most European "leaders" are equally stupid and
corrupt.
God help us all!!!
Posted by: McSomeone, Scotland on 8:45am Sun 13 Jul 08
It ain't our democracy they're interested in but our technology and financial sectors. Most of the FSA agents in the UK are doing industrial and financial espionage rather than military or political.

Our military is broken and couldn't invade the Duchy of Grand Fenwick without NATO Assistance and Parliament is already bought and paid for.
Posted by: McSomeone, Scotland on 8:53am Sun 13 Jul 08
As for our democracy being under threat? What democracy, since when has centralised, top down authoritarianism been democracy?
Posted by: gmac, Germany on 9:41am Sun 13 Jul 08
The fact is that 30% of Eurpoe's gas is sourced from Russia. Russian Siberia is the last great wilderness where massive oil and gas resources have yet to be found. 400Bcf gas reservoirs for 300 million GBP. No where else can this size of resource be found at such bargain prices. British oil interests (Shell, TNK-BP) might not be evicted from Russia, if the British government does not upset Russan sensitivities. Russia might be intersted in Scottish subsea EP sector technology. Russia is cash and hydrocarbon rich. Regards democracy, look at Zimbabwe. Britain is impotent.




Posted by: Joe, London on 10:18am Sun 13 Jul 08
What an idiotic article.
Posted by: laohu, California on 3:14pm Sun 13 Jul 08
The author is transparently promoting the sale of his next book.
Posted by: david fine, u.s. on 7:27pm Sun 13 Jul 08
I have to agree this goes too far...ayman zawahiri a kgb agent? Give me a break.
Posted by: allymax, upvinesass, scotland. on 7:36pm Sun 13 Jul 08
McSomeone wrote:
As for our democracy being under threat? What democracy, since when has centralised, top down authoritarianism been democracy?
Yep!
Posted by: Jim, Irvine on 8:18pm Sun 13 Jul 08
The nicest thing in International news was that the 'Red' and 'Yellow' peoples have agreed
to be 'Chinas' and give a helping hand to the
'Blacks', who were being squeezed till they were 'Blue'in the face by nasty 'White'bankers.
Posted by: Big Boy Did It, And Ran Away on 10:40pm Sun 13 Jul 08
Was that poet wifie Jane Ayres a spy, or is that just another urban myth like Bob Holness doing the Sax on Baker street?
Posted by: Marco, London, United Kingdom on 11:50am Mon 14 Jul 08
Was this man really a "Soviet spymaster"? I thought they were supposed to be intelligent and well-educated and experts at propaganda. Russian KGB masquerading as clergymen? Zawahiri as a KGB agent? Is this article meant to be taken seriously? What the...?

There is also the assumption that "spies" control and generate the wealth of a country. Not so. In Russia about a dozen non-Russian Russians, who called themselves oligarchs, basically stole Russia's assets, bribed everyone on sight, reduced that great country to poverty and almost broke it up. They also controlled the country's media which is real power indeed, in many ways greater than controlling the country's police force and the military. One of them even gave lots of money to parliamentarians when it was proposed to tax income from oil exports when the price of oil reached a certain level. (This audacious bribery was described as "encouraging democratic opposition" by western journalists who put their snouts in the trough) They were also in the process of selling the Russian oil reserves, which they had stolen, to the big American companies resulting in a win-win position for the oligarchs and the Americans and a lose-lose situation for all the Russians. Putin stopped this and his people are greatful.

As for democracy and corruption, it should be pointed out that both Britain and the United States are governed by people who the majority of their countrymen actively dislike, whereas Russians approve OVERWHELMINGLY of Putin as everyone knows. What is democracy supposed to mean, then?

Everyone knows about Saudi oil money and its corruptive influence in Europe and the States. Europe is undergoing a tsunami of Islamic invaders and the corrupt politicians aren't doing anything about it. Indeed they do the opposite of what is required. In Britain, the head of the Church of England and senior judge want the despicable Islamic Law. A poster aimed at recruiting Pakistanis to the police force was removed because it showed a puppy and it seems dogs are considered "unclean" by Moslems. A Swedish senior minister suggested that the Swedes should treat the unwanted "immigrants" if the Swedes wanted to be treated well when the Moslems "become the majority".

As a Western European, I consider Russians to be fellow Europeans (and very good-looking ones at that). We also need Russia as a huge market endowed with amazing resources which we need and which are irreplaceable. But ultimately because they are a great people and fellow Europeans.

As for removing Russia from "the Eight", surely this is another joke. First of all it wouldn't matter all that much. BRIC is where the action is, not in "the Seven". It also requires unanimous agreement by the governments. Can you see Germany, France, Italy voting for it? And then what if Russia then joins OPEC? Even more to the point two weeks ago the American Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson went to Russia to induce them to "invest" in American Treasury Bills. Russia has a massive Sovereign Wealth Fund and Paulson was in fact asking for Russian help to save the American banking system. America is in position to warn, caution or threaten anyone.

Which begs the question. Who caused this article to be written? My bet is that it is the oligarch wanted by the police of 2 BRIC countries, who now amazingly appears on BBC programmes talking about "democracy".

Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login