It’s time to relocalise our lives Joanna Blythman
on life without oil FACED WITH panic at the pumps, Alex Salmond was absolutely right to urge people to behave sensibly and responsibly, by cutting out non-essential trips, and using public transport. But he should have added: "Get used to it", because we urgently need to realise that this isn't just a one-off.
While we fret about filling the tank to visit family this weekend, or get to work this coming week, an infinitely more serious, long-term fuel problem is creeping up on us.
This dispute is simply a taster of more shortages in the pipeline, and the sooner we make permanent, structural changes to the way we live to take account of it, the better.
Not so long ago, those who predicted that we would inevitably run out of oil were condemned as gloom-mongers and hysterics.
The prevailing wisdom was that we could afford to use oil and all its derivatives with abandon because for every oil reserve we drained, there would be another bunch ready to come on tap. But now there is a growing consensus among oil economists that we have already, or are about to pass the "peak" of world oil output, the point after which supply will start to decline.
BP's 2006 Statistical Review of World Energy reported that more than half of oil-producing nations were seeing reduced output. ExxonMobil says that global discovery rates of new oilfields have been declining since 1964. It's scary really.
There we are, motoring along in the fast lane, unaware that we are plunging headlong into a post-oil world, while level-headed, rational geologists, physicists, bankers and corporate think tanks are all busy calculating when, exactly, oil will run out, and what it will mean.
Oil is as essential to the economies of rich nations as water is to the human body. Without oil, the world as we know it seizes up. While there is agreement that we are slowly running out of oil, opinions differ about when it will happen. One authoritative report by the German Energy Watch Group says that 2006 was the peak; another, that by 2030, oil output will drop to 1980s' levels.
But by then the world's population will have doubled and rapidly developing countries such as India will be aspiring to first-world lifestyles, complete with a car in every doorway. We're heading for what the International Energy Agency refers to as a "supply crunch" when oil-reliant economies crumble, bloody wars over access to scant reserves erupt and prices
skyrocket.
Last year, the price of oil broke through the psychological barrier of $100 a barrel. Week on week it climbs, now hovering around $118. Globally, it isn't going to get any better, and in Scotland - even supposing the government clawed back North Sea oil revenues from Westminster on the "It's Scotland's oil" principle - it would be folly to become complacent, or base our economy on what is, at the end of the day, a finite resource.
One little fuel strike and the country is debilitated? This is the nudge we need to remind us that it's time to start adjusting our lives and building skills for the post-oil age. If we ignore this, then peak oil is the slap on the face that should bring us to our senses.
Instead of driving miles to the supermarket to load up on food just in case the shelves are cleared, or whingeing about strikers' ability to cripple the country, we would be better advised to start looking at alternative ways of doing things, based on human energy, ingenuity and appropriate technology. Put simply, our default programmes need to be reset. We need to relocalise our lives.
It means more adjustment than merely declining the offer of yet another oil-derived plastic bag. Affluent middle classes in urban areas have to get over their hang-ups and use public transport, not just during the dispute, but thereafter.
Unless we want an ever more monstrous chunk of our budgets to be
gobbled up in spiralling fuel bills, then it's time to think about selling the
second, even your only car.
If we can't walk, bus or train it to work, then employers must start developing schemes that liberate us from environmentally-ruinous commutes, and allow more people to work from home, exploiting all the benefits of email and telephone conferencing.
Businesses need to understand that it is no longer acceptable to fly staff up and down the UK to attend meetings when they could perfectly well take the train.
Domestic flights ought to be a no-no, unless you are elderly or infirm. And when our globalised food supply, retailing and distribution system is so reliant on oil for everything from fertilisers and pesticides to transportation and storage, growing some food of your own and nurturing local food producers, stops looking less like a marginal hobby and more like self-serving common sense.
Fat on oil, we have developed ludicrously unsustainable habits and the planet can't be expected to cope with the now obscenely large carbon
footprint we leave behind us. Declining oil is a threat, but also an opportunity to rethink the way we live.
|
|

Posted by: Scunnert, Travelling in Nihlon on 11:14pm Sat 26 Apr 08
No more cheap gadgets? No more plastic bags? No more Sunday drives? How will we get oot tae Tescos? Will they have anything to sell? No more synthetic fabrics? What are we going to wear? What are we going to eat? Mass starvation?
Nae worries - Gordon Brown and his rich corporate buddies will get it sorted. Won't they?
No more cheap gadgets? No more plastic bags? No more Sunday drives? How will we get oot tae Tescos? Will they have anything to sell? No more synthetic fabrics? What are we going to wear? What are we going to eat? Mass starvation?
Nae worries - Gordon Brown and his rich corporate buddies will get it sorted. Won't they?
Posted by: The Ghost of Sir William Arrol, The Forthy Bridge on 11:41pm Sat 26 Apr 08
It's not all bad news. The silly EARL project was stopped. This means that in 20 years time we'll have an abandoned airport but won't have to abandon £1bn of railway to it. The money saved is being used to electrify the existing railways instead, and these by and large will go to where people want to travel - much more sensible and enlightened use of resources.
Not sure about the £4bn Forth crossing. It will only be of use if it can carry trains, likely to be the only vehicles using it in 20 year's time. If they build it for road vehicles, they had better build the sides high so that it can cope with horse traffic.
There is an argument, that the two existing bridges (even the road bridge in its weakened state) will be more than capable of handling the declining volume of traffic as oil supplies run out.
It's not all bad news. The silly EARL project was stopped. This means that in 20 years time we'll have an abandoned airport but won't have to abandon £1bn of railway to it. The money saved is being used to electrify the existing railways instead, and these by and large will go to where people want to travel - much more sensible and enlightened use of resources.
Not sure about the £4bn Forth crossing. It will only be of use if it can carry trains, likely to be the only vehicles using it in 20 year's time. If they build it for road vehicles, they had better build the sides high so that it can cope with horse traffic.
There is an argument, that the two existing bridges (even the road bridge in its weakened state) will be more than capable of handling the declining volume of traffic as oil supplies run out.
Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 6:48am Sun 27 Apr 08
Show's how dependent we are on England's oil and everything else that they own in Scotlandshire
Show's how dependent we are on England's oil and everything else that they own in Scotlandshire
Posted by: Bill on 8:54am Sun 27 Apr 08
I agree with every thing Joanna says about society sleepwalking into a peak oil crisis. I hope Joanna is now following her own prescription to reduce travelling. I was struck not so long ago reading one of her restaurant reviews about eating at a place off the motorway in Gretna. She had evidently stopped to eat whilst motoring between London and Glasgow and I got the impression this is how she habitually travels. Knowing nothing about Joanna's home life or lifestyle I like her Sunday columns but reading between the lines often get the impression she virtually commutes between London and Scotland, presumably has two expensive homes, eats all the time in posh restaurants all reflecting a massive oil-dependent carbon footprint. Relocalise? This has to mean staying at home within walking or cycling distance of work and recognising that the grotesque energy profligacy which has developed over the last 150 years has been a brief interlude in the history of the world. The home truth for everyone is the economy has to be contracted ''affluence'' forsaken, life simplified. When will Joanna stay at home -wherever that is -sell her car and get a bike for her everyday transport, learn to live as everyone will have to sooner rather than later live carfree and energy- poor.
I agree with every thing Joanna says about society sleepwalking into a peak oil crisis. I hope Joanna is now following her own prescription to reduce travelling. I was struck not so long ago reading one of her restaurant reviews about eating at a place off the motorway in Gretna. She had evidently stopped to eat whilst motoring between London and Glasgow and I got the impression this is how she habitually travels. Knowing nothing about Joanna's home life or lifestyle I like her Sunday columns but reading between the lines often get the impression she virtually commutes between London and Scotland, presumably has two expensive homes, eats all the time in posh restaurants all reflecting a massive oil-dependent carbon footprint. Relocalise? This has to mean staying at home within walking or cycling distance of work and recognising that the grotesque energy profligacy which has developed over the last 150 years has been a brief interlude in the history of the world. The home truth for everyone is the economy has to be contracted ''affluence'' forsaken, life simplified. When will Joanna stay at home -wherever that is -sell her car and get a bike for her everyday transport, learn to live as everyone will have to sooner rather than later live carfree and energy- poor.
Posted by: Khaled Ibn Walid, saudi Arabia on 8:54am Sun 27 Apr 08
This is what happens when idiots like Tony Blair are given carte blanche to send the British military on misadventures engineered by the Bush regime and the israeli warmongers.
I feel sorry for the taxed to death British taxpayers who will , as you rightly point out, face enduring and increasing difficulties because of obscene militarism and the media glorification of what really ammounts to crimes against humanity.
The British people have the capacity to contribute much to humanity's advance.Imitating Israeli and Bush regime hooliganism , is counterproductive.
This is what happens when idiots like Tony Blair are given carte blanche to send the British military on misadventures engineered by the Bush regime and the israeli warmongers.
I feel sorry for the taxed to death British taxpayers who will , as you rightly point out, face enduring and increasing difficulties because of obscene militarism and the media glorification of what really ammounts to crimes against humanity.
The British people have the capacity to contribute much to humanity's advance.Imitating Israeli and Bush regime hooliganism , is counterproductive.
Posted by: oily, glasgow on 9:26am Sun 27 Apr 08
this article by joanna is fully expanded in 'the last oil shock' by david strahan. i've not read a better book that covers all areas of the impending oil crisis that lurks around the next corner.
Bill, Peak Oil passed by in the 70's for america, 90's for OPEC countries...you might have missed it, for it was drowned out by oil company celebrations over record profits...hmmm
this article by joanna is fully expanded in 'the last oil shock' by david strahan. i've not read a better book that covers all areas of the impending oil crisis that lurks around the next corner.
Bill, Peak Oil passed by in the 70's for america, 90's for OPEC countries...you might have missed it, for it was drowned out by oil company celebrations over record profits...hmmm
Posted by: SC on 9:34am Sun 27 Apr 08
Oh, my god. The Luddites are out in force today.
I think you all need to get a sense of perspective. Oil will never run out. Increasing prices will see to that as we switch to alternative sources that become economic.
Luckily, our growing economy is providing the wealth that will enable us to afford the more expensive power sources, whilst maintain the richness of our globalised lives.
But it will take change. Are you luddites up for it?
Oh, my god. The Luddites are out in force today.
I think you all need to get a sense of perspective. Oil will never run out. Increasing prices will see to that as we switch to alternative sources that become economic.
Luckily, our growing economy is providing the wealth that will enable us to afford the more expensive power sources, whilst maintain the richness of our globalised lives.
But it will take change. Are you luddites up for it?
Posted by: oily, glasgow on 9:44am Sun 27 Apr 08
[bold]'Oil will never run out'[/bold] stunning quote.
oops my dodo powered generator seems to be running low - can a n y o n e . .
'Oil will never run out' stunning quote.
oops my dodo powered generator seems to be running low - can a n y o n e . .
Posted by: McSomeone, Scotland on 10:05am Sun 27 Apr 08
[quote]Oil will never run out. Increasing prices will see to that as we switch to alternative sources that become economic.[/quote]
The trouble with that argument SC is that none of the alternative fuels are in sufficient supply or cheap enough to produce to provide every family with a car, let alone two or three cars. As far as biofuels go we have a choice, food or fuel, also it's going to cost a lot more than oil to produce and be just as damaging to the enviornment.
Ultimately our choice is simple, keep going as we are like lemmings or change our lifestyles and step back from the abyss.
We don't all need family cars, let alone three family cars. Also we don't need our cheap overseas holidays, nor to fly to NY or Tokyo for business meetings when they can be carried out via Internet conferencing.
What oil is left needs to be conserved for more important use, agriculture, distribution, medicine and vital production
Oil will never run out. Increasing prices will see to that as we switch to alternative sources that become economic.
The trouble with that argument SC is that none of the alternative fuels are in sufficient supply or cheap enough to produce to provide every family with a car, let alone two or three cars. As far as biofuels go we have a choice, food or fuel, also it's going to cost a lot more than oil to produce and be just as damaging to the enviornment.
Ultimately our choice is simple, keep going as we are like lemmings or change our lifestyles and step back from the abyss.
We don't all need family cars, let alone three family cars. Also we don't need our cheap overseas holidays, nor to fly to NY or Tokyo for business meetings when they can be carried out via Internet conferencing.
What oil is left needs to be conserved for more important use, agriculture, distribution, medicine and vital production
Posted by: dave, london on 10:32am Sun 27 Apr 08
another middle class muppet who has never lived in a remote area where public transport doesn't exist. try taking a family on public transport in london, apart from the cost and the time taken there is the sheer numbers. would that we could all stay in blyth land with a shop on the corner and clean public transport
another middle class muppet who has never lived in a remote area where public transport doesn't exist. try taking a family on public transport in london, apart from the cost and the time taken there is the sheer numbers. would that we could all stay in blyth land with a shop on the corner and clean public transport
Posted by: Rhisiart Gwilym, Cymry, Britain on 10:51am Sun 27 Apr 08
SC is taking the ssip of course. If s/he/it can read and write, then by now s/he/it must at least be getting just an inkling that the famous limits to growth which the Club of Rome started talking about thirty-odd years back -- to universal rubbishing from the growth-for-ever crowd -- our now here, close and deadly, and reaching out to get us all as we speak.
SC is a naive troll, or a sith-stirrer. LOL, and pass.
SC is taking the ssip of course. If s/he/it can read and write, then by now s/he/it must at least be getting just an inkling that the famous limits to growth which the Club of Rome started talking about thirty-odd years back -- to universal rubbishing from the growth-for-ever crowd -- our now here, close and deadly, and reaching out to get us all as we speak.
SC is a naive troll, or a sith-stirrer. LOL, and pass.
Posted by: Hatty, Portobello on 1:50pm Sun 27 Apr 08
[quote][bold]dave[/bold] wrote:
another middle class muppet who has never lived in a remote area where public transport doesn't exist. try taking a family on public transport in london, apart from the cost and the time taken there is the sheer numbers. would that we could all stay in blyth land with a shop on the corner and clean public transport[/quote] Don’t think you quite follow the message of Peak Oil, Dave. It will happen no matter how inconvenient or impossible it is to folks in remote areas or for Londoners. In fact it is difficult to believe London and other mega-cities are sustainable at all. At some point demand for oil (and other resources) is going to exceed the earth’s capacity to supply. If it is 20+ years away and we act now it is probably possible to make the necessary adjustments – but our lifestyles will have to change. If Peak Oil is on us now though, or even hits us over the next 5 years then life is about to get very painful.
dave wrote:
another middle class muppet who has never lived in a remote area where public transport doesn't exist. try taking a family on public transport in london, apart from the cost and the time taken there is the sheer numbers. would that we could all stay in blyth land with a shop on the corner and clean public transport
Don’t think you quite follow the message of Peak Oil, Dave. It will happen no matter how inconvenient or impossible it is to folks in remote areas or for Londoners. In fact it is difficult to believe London and other mega-cities are sustainable at all. At some point demand for oil (and other resources) is going to exceed the earth’s capacity to supply. If it is 20+ years away and we act now it is probably possible to make the necessary adjustments – but our lifestyles will have to change. If Peak Oil is on us now though, or even hits us over the next 5 years then life is about to get very painful.
Posted by: Morag McKinlay, Scotland on 5:30pm Sun 27 Apr 08
I have the answer----get poor,like me----very little carbon footprint!
I have the answer----get poor,like me----very little carbon footprint!
Posted by: Scunnert, Travelling in Nihlon on 8:11pm Sun 27 Apr 08
[quote][bold]Morag McKinlay[/bold] wrote:
I have the answer----get poor,like me----very little carbon footprint![/quote] Already there Morag.
Morag McKinlay wrote:
I have the answer----get poor,like me----very little carbon footprint!
Already there Morag.
Posted by: Rene, The Dying Dinosaur (Slobasaurus-Rex) called U.S.A. on 8:53pm Sun 27 Apr 08
I grew up in a small woodsey hamlet on a river. It had its own small scale stores and a local filling station(Shell). There was a barber, a theatre, a dentist, a doctor, a tiny cafe' eatery, a bar/pub, a library, a sporting goods store, a grocer, a hardware, a tiny sized used car lot, a family fashion shop + tailor, with a dozen 1920's-1930's era apartments over the stores. We had three churches within a half mile of the other. There is two schools there from K-6/7-12, within easy walking distance. There was boat rentals, fishing, small water air craft, and an old side paddle wheel ship that gave tours.It was a bucolic, friendly, beautiful environment to grow up. Everyone walked to the stores, kids rode bicyles from snow 1st melt to 1st snow fall. The schools had tennis courts, playgrounds, base ball diamonds, football fields, with enough extra land a kid could easily fly kites or model airplanes and during the winter there were ice skating areas. We had four inland lakes nearby for swiming as well. This is all the local kids and teens hung out to meet up, and look at each other.
Today; all the stores are out of business, the gas station shut down, the lakes closed to the public because of private condos there now,Two churches closed and moved to bigger new buildings much further away, The air craft are gone, no boats for rent, fishing is no good, the paddle boat bought and taken away, no more ice skating arenas, the tennis courts are now parking lots, The fields are now covered with other buildings, the 7-12 school was turned into a special ed school, and they now bus the middle to high school teens to a school several miles away. The hamlet is now surrounded by two major express ways with one that cut right through the middle of it, so now there is lots of noise and vehicle stink in the air. The trees are dying from pollution, and property values haven't kept pace with the times.
Very few kids play outside any longer, with even fewer riding bicycles.
This had always been a middle working class area. No one had lots of money. It was common for two kids to split a 8oz. bottle of Coke-Cola. Or to break a Popsicle in two and each have a half. No one was chubby or fat! Now they are mostly walking porkers.
Now every thing has been taken over by big box outlets, supermarkets, mega car dealers, and require that you drive many miles to each one. This is progress? Who ever thought that this MODERN life style was better, was INSANE! I want my old style little town back...I want an economic crash so severe that it makes AMERIKA rethink what it has done to it self.
Bunch of stupid-assed, lazy, hedonistic, greedy, war mongers...
I grew up in a small woodsey hamlet on a river. It had its own small scale stores and a local filling station(Shell). There was a barber, a theatre, a dentist, a doctor, a tiny cafe' eatery, a bar/pub, a library, a sporting goods store, a grocer, a hardware, a tiny sized used car lot, a family fashion shop + tailor, with a dozen 1920's-1930's era apartments over the stores. We had three churches within a half mile of the other. There is two schools there from K-6/7-12, within easy walking distance. There was boat rentals, fishing, small water air craft, and an old side paddle wheel ship that gave tours.It was a bucolic, friendly, beautiful environment to grow up. Everyone walked to the stores, kids rode bicyles from snow 1st melt to 1st snow fall. The schools had tennis courts, playgrounds, base ball diamonds, football fields, with enough extra land a kid could easily fly kites or model airplanes and during the winter there were ice skating areas. We had four inland lakes nearby for swiming as well. This is all the local kids and teens hung out to meet up, and look at each other.
Today; all the stores are out of business, the gas station shut down, the lakes closed to the public because of private condos there now,Two churches closed and moved to bigger new buildings much further away, The air craft are gone, no boats for rent, fishing is no good, the paddle boat bought and taken away, no more ice skating arenas, the tennis courts are now parking lots, The fields are now covered with other buildings, the 7-12 school was turned into a special ed school, and they now bus the middle to high school teens to a school several miles away. The hamlet is now surrounded by two major express ways with one that cut right through the middle of it, so now there is lots of noise and vehicle stink in the air. The trees are dying from pollution, and property values haven't kept pace with the times.
Very few kids play outside any longer, with even fewer riding bicycles.
This had always been a middle working class area. No one had lots of money. It was common for two kids to split a 8oz. bottle of Coke-Cola. Or to break a Popsicle in two and each have a half. No one was chubby or fat! Now they are mostly walking porkers.
Now every thing has been taken over by big box outlets, supermarkets, mega car dealers, and require that you drive many miles to each one. This is progress? Who ever thought that this MODERN life style was better, was INSANE! I want my old style little town back...I want an economic crash so severe that it makes AMERIKA rethink what it has done to it self.
Bunch of stupid-assed, lazy, hedonistic, greedy, war mongers...
Posted by: Scunnert, Travelling in Nihlon on 10:52pm Sun 27 Apr 08
Rene, The Dying Dinosaur (Slobasaurus-Rex) called U.S.A. on 8:53pm today
I'm with you Rene. I'm old enough to have seen the same catastrophic errors in our society. But who has the power? The developers have the ear of the politicians and no one listens to old farts like me. I feel like Edward G. Robertson in Soylent Green watching the movie of a beautiful pastoral landscape as he is euthanized saying to Charleton Heston, see - I told you so!
Rene, The Dying Dinosaur (Slobasaurus-Rex) called U.S.A. on 8:53pm today
I'm with you Rene. I'm old enough to have seen the same catastrophic errors in our society. But who has the power? The developers have the ear of the politicians and no one listens to old farts like me. I feel like Edward G. Robertson in Soylent Green watching the movie of a beautiful pastoral landscape as he is euthanized saying to Charleton Heston, see - I told you so!
Posted by: Deacon, Grants Pass, OR on 4:18pm Mon 28 Apr 08
#######
#######
Current crises in oil and food have been
conspiratorially generated. Read and learn:
What we are facing in 2008 is a Third-Way (socialist/
communist/capitalist
) conspiracy to equalize the world's
economies, as preface to installing one-world government;
a plan hatched during the 1940s GATT formulations.
Keep in mind that there is no PEAK
OIL crisis—only a decades-long,
purposeful cap on searching and
drilling and refining for oil, in
order to put the world in crisis
mode.
Using food to produce fuel is part
of the conspiracy to generate food
riots, in order to destabilize
governments; and this so-called
"war on terror" is also part of
the secret plan, although its
primary beneficially is Israel
in the exchange of blood and
treasury for oil--as payoff for
protecting Israel from an ever-
threatening, encircling Islamic
Arabism.
“Because many nations’ agricultural
production will decline under NAFTA
and GATT, in becoming dependent on
the more productive nations’ capacity
to export cheaper product to them,
they’ll become gravely vulnerable to
any of the exporting nations’ food-
production declines, possibly resulting
from bad weather conditions or bad
economies. ‘Free trade’ in food sets up
a looming catastrophe (read my essay,
GATT: Ubiquitous Treason)…Wouldn’t such
worldwide economic interdependence
necessarily set the stage for a worldwide
economic collapse should any one nation
seriously falter? Such a worldwide collapse
would make America’s Great Depression
appear like good times. Why aren’t the
NAFTA and GATT crafters arguing for more
economic independence for nations - for
rugged individualism among nations – rather
than building this One World interdependency
that their brand of ‘free trade’ necessarily
engenders?”
The NAFTA Debacle (1995)
http://naftadebacle1
.blogspot.com/
Planned Destruction of America
http://planneddestru
ctionofamerica.blogs
pot.com/
#######
#######
#######
#######
Current crises in oil and food have been
conspiratorially generated. Read and learn:
What we are facing in 2008 is a Third-Way (socialist/
communist/capitalist
) conspiracy to equalize the world's
economies, as preface to installing one-world government;
a plan hatched during the 1940s GATT formulations.
Keep in mind that there is no PEAK
OIL crisis—only a decades-long,
purposeful cap on searching and
drilling and refining for oil, in
order to put the world in crisis
mode.
Using food to produce fuel is part
of the conspiracy to generate food
riots, in order to destabilize
governments; and this so-called
"war on terror" is also part of
the secret plan, although its
primary beneficially is Israel
in the exchange of blood and
treasury for oil--as payoff for
protecting Israel from an ever-
threatening, encircling Islamic
Arabism.
“Because many nations’ agricultural
production will decline under NAFTA
and GATT, in becoming dependent on
the more productive nations’ capacity
to export cheaper product to them,
they’ll become gravely vulnerable to
any of the exporting nations’ food-
production declines, possibly resulting
from bad weather conditions or bad
economies. ‘Free trade’ in food sets up
a looming catastrophe (read my essay,
GATT: Ubiquitous Treason)…Wouldn’t such
worldwide economic interdependence
necessarily set the stage for a worldwide
economic collapse should any one nation
seriously falter? Such a worldwide collapse
would make America’s Great Depression
appear like good times. Why aren’t the
NAFTA and GATT crafters arguing for more
economic independence for nations - for
rugged individualism among nations – rather
than building this One World interdependency
that their brand of ‘free trade’ necessarily
engenders?”
The NAFTA Debacle (1995)
http://naftadebacle1
.blogspot.com/
Planned Destruction of America
http://planneddestru
ctionofamerica.blogs
pot.com/
#######
#######
Posted by: Samantha, Washington, DC on 4:28pm Tue 29 Apr 08
[quote]Oil will never run out. Increasing prices will see to that as we switch to alternative sources that become economic.
[/quote]
There is some truth to this statement, but alternative energy soures will not become cost-competitive without focused, sustained attention and effort on the part of policymakers and investors. The more proactive we are, the easier the transition will be. Even oil companies, such as BP, have begun to notice this, and have devoted extensive resources towards the promotion of renewable energy.
If you're interested and would like to know more about what BP and other companies are doing in this sector, the CEO of BP Alternative Energy, Vivienne Cox, will be a keynote speaker at the Renewable Energy Finance Forum, held June 18-19 in New York City.
The Renewable Energy Finance Forum-Wall Street brings together financiers, investors, and renewable energy project developers to network, strike deals, and learn how money is made in the industry. In addition to BP Alternative Energy's CEO, over 40 of the highest profile industry leaders will be speaking at the event. In short, it is a "must attend" event for anyone involved in the renewable energy sector.
For more information, visit http://www.REFFWallS
treet.com.
Oil will never run out. Increasing prices will see to that as we switch to alternative sources that become economic.
There is some truth to this statement, but alternative energy soures will not become cost-competitive without focused, sustained attention and effort on the part of policymakers and investors. The more proactive we are, the easier the transition will be. Even oil companies, such as BP, have begun to notice this, and have devoted extensive resources towards the promotion of renewable energy.
If you're interested and would like to know more about what BP and other companies are doing in this sector, the CEO of BP Alternative Energy, Vivienne Cox, will be a keynote speaker at the Renewable Energy Finance Forum, held June 18-19 in New York City.
The Renewable Energy Finance Forum-Wall Street brings together financiers, investors, and renewable energy project developers to network, strike deals, and learn how money is made in the industry. In addition to BP Alternative Energy's CEO, over 40 of the highest profile industry leaders will be speaking at the event. In short, it is a "must attend" event for anyone involved in the renewable energy sector.
For more information, visit http://www.REFFWallS
treet.com.