Home
October 12, 2008 Est 1999 Scotland's award-winning independent newspaper
Alan Taylor's Diary
OH no! Just when you thought it was safe to venture into a bookshop again, up pops Jakey Rowling, below, author of Larry Stutter And The Mother Of All Hangovers and other moneyspinners, to announce that a book of fairy tales will be on sale in time for Christmas. All sales, says Ms Jakey, will go to a children’s charity. What she does not say is that this altruistic gesture will keep her name in the public eye for yet another year. What have we done that we must suffer so? Are we never to be relieved of our pain?

COMMONWEALTH COMMANDO training
AT last, something to cheer from China, where the Olympic Games are to be held shortly. Rightly worried what sports hacks might think critically of the way their citizens dress and behave, the authorities in Beijing have issued guidelines to four million households. Men, for instance, have been told they should not wear pyjamas in the street, bare their chests or wear white socks with black shoes. Women, meanwhile, must wear black socks to cover up their thick ankles, assuming they have them of course, eschew see-through garments and don short skirts only if their legs are up to it. Both sexes must go easy on the garlic, refrain from spitting in the street, and shave daily. I jest. The last applies only to men.

I do hope my dear friend Alexei Salmonella is paying heed, especially with the Commonwealth Games in the offing. For a start, he could tell men that if they do go commando when wearing a kilt, it is not necessary to advertise the fact or volunteer to show off their hairy hunkers to passers‑by. He could also hand out spot fines to gum-discarders, dug walkers who don't pick up Rover's deposits and those nyaffs who roam Glesca's streets in the wee sma' hours, bellowing like bulls in heat. Another problem is shorts. Global warming has made the wearing of these items universal. Sometimes one sees them in offices, even ours. With T-shirts and sandals. Ugh! They must go. Thus Mr Alexei must appoint a fashion czar as a matter of priority. May I humbly suggest he consider his fragrant wife Moira, Strichen's answer to Carla Bruni?

Statue-removing fools take the biscuit
AS you will see elsewhere in this throbbing organ, I have been promenading along Embra's George Street with my new dear friend Sandy Stoddart, a sculptor from Paisley. No, that does not mean he is handy with a Stanley knife. Mr Stoddart makes sculptures of famous men. As yet, wummin have not figured significantly in his oeuvre. His subjects have included Robert Louis Stevenson, David Hume and Adam Smith. In general, he is happier with deid folk than living.

His latest monument is to James Clerk Maxwell, the physicist, which is due to be unveiled in George Street in November. Not so long ago, said Mr Stoddart, there were philistines who wanted to clear the statues away in order to allow cars to flow more freely. Mercifully, wiser counsels prevailed. But one must be ever-vigilant. Destroying, defacing and sticking traffic cones on statues, said Mr Stoddart, is a very, very dangerous business, and addictive.

I can well imagine, therefore, what his response might be to the news that in Italy a movement is gathering pace that aims to remove statues of Garibaldi, whom previous generations championed for his efforts to unite Italy and who, generously, lent his name to a biscuit. In Sicily, which is full of nitwits, a mayor has torn down a sign bearing The Biscuit's name, and denounced him as "a ferocious murderer in the service of Freemasonry and the British."

This wanton act of municipal vandalism has spurred on similarly ignorant others - including numpties in the Northern League, which Silvio Barmysconi takes seriously - who would like to split Italy in two, thus divesting the prosperous north of the Mafia-riven crooks in the south. What to add? Nowt. Except to observe that among Garibaldi's foes were the Bourbons, which, were it a war between biscuits, I'd be inclined to prefer.

It's the drivers, not the roads
ANOTHER week, and more deaths on the roads. The latest were on the A9, on which four people died eight days ago. These are usually termed "road accidents". We do not yet know the full circumstances surrounding these deaths but I am often confused when "road accidents" are blamed on the roads themselves. Roads do not cause crashes and deaths: reckless, incompetent, criminal drivers do. This seems not to occur to the Powers That Be. After last weekend's deaths, Fergus Ewing EmSPee predicted his chums in the Gnats would upgrade the killer road, as if it were a serial murderer. He found an ally in Neil Greig, director of the IAM Motoring Trust, who said: "We need to do more, particularly, on the design of roads in rural areas, which are so unforgiving." What he really means is that where people drive like lunatics on country roads with blind bends, they are likely to come a cropper. I agree. What I do not agree with is the solution. You can tinker with roads until they're all dual carriageways or motorways, but you'll never stop bampots causing horrendous accidents. That, though, is not such an easy problem for our tribunes to solve.

Tracey, when I'm with you ...
TO the Gallery of Modern Art and "the first major UK retrospective" of work by Tracey Eminem. I know what you're thinking: why? There are, alas, some questions for which even I do not have an answer. As I arrive, a man is touching up Ms Eminem's bum, which is clad in black knickers. Before you, dear reader, get yours in a twist, may I hasten to add that this is not Ms Eminem's actual bum, merely a photo of it, albeit of a humungous size. It also appears on the front cover of the catalogue of the exhibition, which says it all, really.

For this exhibition is not so much of work by Ms Eminem but work about her. Across several rooms, she is omnipresent: legs spreadeagled, pubic triangle exposed, in a black bra, nude, dancing (embarrassingly badly) on a video, talking to her mum, stuffing banknotes up her Cheddar Gorge. Her drawings remind me not of Picasso, Hockney or Egon Schiele but of the graffiti in public lavvies.

For instance, there, displayed in frames, like Fabergé eggs, are the shoes she wore as a wean. There are also pages what she wrote, detailing how she was refused admittance to a party because she didn't have an invitation. "Mum," she asked when she got home, "what's an invitation?"

In another room is an unmade bed, one of Ms Eminem's most famous works. It looks like something worthy of inspection by Rentokil. You may have one just like it. On a wall is a neon sign that says: "My c*** is wet with fear". Me! Me! Me! Me! That's what this exhibition shrieks.

I am ushered into a room full of reverential hacks, celebrity gawpers and my dear friend Ricardo Demarco. Ms Eminem has kindly agreed to answer a few questions. On the walls are blankets, decorated with words and other stuff, sewn crudely together like patchwork. One says: "Every time I feel love I think Christ I'm going to be crucified." Asked to explain this "wonderful" piece by Mr Ricardo, Ms Eminem says she doesn't want to offend anyone, but whenever she's "having sex or being f***** I feel like I'm being crucified."

She talks about her famous tent, in which she remembered everyone with whom she'd ever slept with. Is Scotland ready for Tracey Eminem?, asks the man from the Hootsmon. You bet, says Ms Eminem, citing the welcoming staff in the hotel where she's staying and an assistant in a shoe shop. She really must try to get out more.

The mark of an innocent man
SUCH, however, is modern art. Another typical example may be found at the Ingleby Gallery. At the Ingleby is a billboard, to be filled every three months by a different artist. First up is Turner Prize winner Mark Wallinger, who has come up with "Mark Wallinger is Innocent". This is debatable. It refers to a campaign to free an armed robber who was in fact guilty. Says Mr Wallaby: "Who could ever claim they were innocent? And when? It's like one of these signs on a shop: Back in five minutes'. I'm sorry, but five minutes from when? ... maybe I was innocent on May 25, 1959 his date of birth. But in most senses, it's not something I can boast about." One can see why.

Share this story on: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | NowPublic | Yahoo!
Posted by: Tam Glen, the but n ben on 9:59pm Sat 2 Aug 08
"Its the drivers not the roads"

Well I would say the exacte opposite.

Its the roads not the drivers.

More vehicles use the M8 than the A9, so why then does the A9 have a worse safety record?

Because it is a dangerous road.
Posted by: Paul Spencer, Glasgow on 12:50am Sun 3 Aug 08
Alan, you are so right for once Sandy Stoddart doesnt do wommen much, but his bust of Jane Richie is a wonderful classic piece of a modern woman with a homage to the Romans and Greeks. Then again could you not persuade Sandy to do a an al fresco cheddar gorge a la Emin it could make Rodin's thinker a mere David san les knackers!!! After all we do live in a metrosexual age
Posted by: Normal sized human on 1:27am Sun 3 Aug 08
Nothing from Hugh Kerr this week, I see.

Alan should write something about people with weird domestic arrangements.
Posted by: Alan, Languedoc on 9:44am Sun 3 Aug 08
Like most of this - always good to put 'celebrities' in their place...but your comment about JKR has to smell of sour grapes. As far as I know, she has only written for children and adolescents, we adults aren't supposed to read her stuff. Unfortunately, once you write best-sellers, others become jealous and think 'I could have written that...' And of course the modern tendency to make films out of everything (and make even more money)creates even more envy.
Posted by: Alan on 10:55am Sun 3 Aug 08
Taylor believes he's being waspish. He's a bitter wee fruit.
Posted by: Claudero, Edinburgh on 1:19pm Sun 3 Aug 08
Fruit is wrong about Taylor, I hadn't read his stuff for some time before I noticed the Rowling abuse. I can't think why the woman would need to be kept in the public eye by a gesture of any sort, and if she can manage currents of money so that they flow where they are needed nobody should make a cheap jibe about that. And anybody can make cheap jibes like that, like for instance noting the specks of rust on the offthepeg Taylorisms above and suggesting it's time for the machinery which generated them to be returned to the toyshop and reprogrammed.
I wouldn't of course say that, but it's the sort of thing Tailer goes infer, or Taylor goes in for, ho-bleedin-ho!
Posted by: Mark Boyle, Johnstone on 3:40pm Sun 3 Aug 08
Alan wrote:
Taylor believes he's being waspish. He's a bitter wee fruit.
Oooo, scratch his eyes out! :D

He was probably trying to get what he though would be easy attention. Rowling devotees tend to be highly protective of their idol - the Mugglenet in particular would put Mandelson to shame for its rapid reaction to any perceived slight in the media anywhere worldwide of their heroine: as anyone that has observed their distasteful turning against The Leaky Cauldron site (currently embroiled in a legal battle with Rowling over a 'Potter Dictionary') will testify.

That said, there IS a point to be made that its only months ago that a "never to be printed" copy of 'Beedle The Bard' was sold at hideous expense at auction...and now all of a sudden it is due to be mass marketed. Charity or not, it does seem that she is somewhat whose word is to be taken with a pinch of salt...something journalist Carol Sarler has long pointed out.

Interesting though to notice that none has taken the bait this time. Lack of interest, or are the Potter fans themselves giving a loud 'Hmmmm...' over this turn of events?
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login