REBUTTAL Maureen Watt on Scots SCOTS VALUE their badges of national identity. Landscape, literature, history - all are part of what makes us Scottish. When the rest of the world joins us in bringing in the New Year singing a Scots song, shouldn't we be proud and speak Scots?
Until recently, it was only the oral tradition which kept Scots alive but today it's everywhere: in novels, children's books, in advertising and on websites, as a spoken and written language of the 21st century - and speakers are starting young. ItchyCoo, an imprint which specialises in Scots-language books for youngsters, won an award last year for its illustrated tale Katie's Moose. A success for older readers was the graphic novel Kidnappit, published as part of the Unesco City of Literature's One Book, One Edinburgh reading campaign.
The Scots presence on the internet is considerable, too, whether it's home-grown recordings of Burns's songs on YouTube or debates on Maw Broon's Cookbook.
Children and young people enjoy and learn from the diversity of language used in their homes, their communities, in the media and by their peers. When taught well, children in Scottish schools are learning about what constitutes good English. Likewise they should be guided on the value of Scots language and its use.
Spoken media is also having a profound effect on Scots language, with increasing pressure from dialects from across the UK. Teenagers are also using words from other styles heard on television, such as American English. And with different languages heard on our streets, perhaps Polish and Mandarin will enrich our daily speech. No language stands still, and Scots can benefit from these new influences, but it would be wrong to allow it to be replaced by them.
There has been a gradual erosion of Scots from the modern landscape, too. In our new housing estates, we no longer seem to live in "braes", "straths" or "wynds" but in avenues and crescents. While this may seem a minor point, it is worth remembering that the languages, dialects and literature of Scotland provide a sense of identity and are a valuable resource for young people.
This week, Learning and Teaching Scotland will release the draft outcomes for literacy under the new Curriculum for Excellence, which puts new emphasis on literacy and all aspects of communication in the teaching of three to 15-year-olds.
But in defining literacy for the 21st century, we must consider the forms of language young people experience and use in daily life. Consider that in a 24-hour period they encounter Scots, dialects of English, text messaging, computer language, numerical formulae, and foreign languages and the task is brought into focus.
It is important that Scots is considered no less valuable than other languages. Through the Curriculum for Excellence, we want to ensure pupils are exposed to the literature and languages of Scotland by teachers using relevant, real-life and enjoyable resources.
By engaging them through different media, from prose to the spoken word to songs, our young people can develop their appreciation of Scotland's indigenous languages and their teachers can value the languages the children bring to school.
Across the EU, languages such as Breton and Cornish are attracting more interest. Under Part II of the European Charter for Minority or Regional Languages, the Scottish government is committed to promoting and developing the use of the Scots language - where better to start than in our schools?
Now is the time for the children of Scotland to rediscover Scots.
Maureen Watt MSP is the minister for schools and skills
|
|

Posted by: Scunnert, Travelling in Nihlon on 10:18pm Sat 16 Feb 08
Well said Maureen.
Posted by: JC on 12:26am Sun 17 Feb 08
No, you should be ensuring that children can read, write and understand English and be able to communicate with other English speakers, not wasting our taxes on pointless nationalistic political gimmicks such as this, not least because there is no such language as 'Scots'.
No, you should be ensuring that children can read, write and understand English and be able to communicate with other English speakers, not wasting our taxes on pointless nationalistic political gimmicks such as this, not least because there is no such language as 'Scots'.
Posted by: Frances on 12:55am Sun 17 Feb 08
JC, if it's not a language, how come it's officially recognised as a language at the European level? Typical prejudice, people who dare to speak Scots are just "speaking English badly". I suppose you think everyone in Norway should forget about their own daft non-existent language and get on with being able to read, write and understand Danish properly.
JC, if it's not a language, how come it's officially recognised as a language at the European level? Typical prejudice, people who dare to speak Scots are just "speaking English badly". I suppose you think everyone in Norway should forget about their own daft non-existent language and get on with being able to read, write and understand Danish properly.
Posted by: Jwil, Lanarkshire on 1:05am Sun 17 Feb 08
Even the Landed Gentry spoke Scots at one time!
Even the Landed Gentry spoke Scots at one time!
Posted by: Stuart Black, Dubai on 5:20am Sun 17 Feb 08
JC, so Dutch is just a b@stard variant of German, Flemish is Dutch by another name, etc?
However, I do agree that children should be able to read, writew and understand whatever language they use, sadly seems to be a dying art.
JC, so Dutch is just a b@stard variant of German, Flemish is Dutch by another name, etc?
However, I do agree that children should be able to read, writew and understand whatever language they use, sadly seems to be a dying art.
Posted by: Stuart Black, Dubai on 5:23am Sun 17 Feb 08
OOps!
[quote]writew[/quote]
I obviously need more practice!
OOps!
writew
I obviously need more practice!
Posted by: Edwin, Glasgow on 11:02am Sun 17 Feb 08
Um yes well said but why was it not said in Scots?
Um yes well said but why was it not said in Scots?
Posted by: tony on 11:18am Sun 17 Feb 08
So now we are to have all the headbangers teaching West of Scotland children they are using bad Scots as well as bad English. The "scots" lobby is run by a bunch of linguistic racists who think "the" language was "corrupted" by the Irish coming over in the nineteenth century. Their Lallans letters to the editor etc are grotesque and obscene in their inauthenticity. I have yet to hear a single speaker on radio or anywhere else actually speak the language they are advocating when they are advocating Scots. Yes, let children be aware of Dunbar, Henryson etc up to Soutar; but they should know that the sounds they use in Castlemilk and other working class schemes go back to these poets: the middle class mob who dominate the "Scots" lobby would see their language as "slang" etc, and think that by stocking up with obsolete archaisms this would be going back to a "real" Scots. When for goodness sake are teachers going to just listen to what their children speak and ACCEPT it as good language, rather than all this status-driven rubbish about Scots.
So now we are to have all the headbangers teaching West of Scotland children they are using bad Scots as well as bad English. The "scots" lobby is run by a bunch of linguistic racists who think "the" language was "corrupted" by the Irish coming over in the nineteenth century. Their Lallans letters to the editor etc are grotesque and obscene in their inauthenticity. I have yet to hear a single speaker on radio or anywhere else actually speak the language they are advocating when they are advocating Scots. Yes, let children be aware of Dunbar, Henryson etc up to Soutar; but they should know that the sounds they use in Castlemilk and other working class schemes go back to these poets: the middle class mob who dominate the "Scots" lobby would see their language as "slang" etc, and think that by stocking up with obsolete archaisms this would be going back to a "real" Scots. When for goodness sake are teachers going to just listen to what their children speak and ACCEPT it as good language, rather than all this status-driven rubbish about Scots.
Posted by: tony on 11:18am Sun 17 Feb 08
So now we are to have all the headbangers teaching West of Scotland children they are using bad Scots as well as bad English. The "scots" lobby is run by a bunch of linguistic racists who think "the" language was "corrupted" by the Irish coming over in the nineteenth century. Their Lallans letters to the editor etc are grotesque and obscene in their inauthenticity. I have yet to hear a single speaker on radio or anywhere else actually speak the language they are advocating when they are advocating Scots. Yes, let children be aware of Dunbar, Henryson etc up to Soutar; but they should know that the sounds they use in Castlemilk and other working class schemes go back to these poets: the middle class mob who dominate the "Scots" lobby would see their language as "slang" etc, and think that by stocking up with obsolete archaisms this would be going back to a "real" Scots. When for goodness sake are teachers going to just listen to what their children speak and ACCEPT it as good language, rather than all this status-driven rubbish about Scots.
So now we are to have all the headbangers teaching West of Scotland children they are using bad Scots as well as bad English. The "scots" lobby is run by a bunch of linguistic racists who think "the" language was "corrupted" by the Irish coming over in the nineteenth century. Their Lallans letters to the editor etc are grotesque and obscene in their inauthenticity. I have yet to hear a single speaker on radio or anywhere else actually speak the language they are advocating when they are advocating Scots. Yes, let children be aware of Dunbar, Henryson etc up to Soutar; but they should know that the sounds they use in Castlemilk and other working class schemes go back to these poets: the middle class mob who dominate the "Scots" lobby would see their language as "slang" etc, and think that by stocking up with obsolete archaisms this would be going back to a "real" Scots. When for goodness sake are teachers going to just listen to what their children speak and ACCEPT it as good language, rather than all this status-driven rubbish about Scots.
Posted by: Tony on 11:19am Sun 17 Feb 08
So now we are to have all the headbangers teaching West of Scotland children they are using bad Scots as well as bad English. The "scots" lobby is run by a bunch of linguistic racists who think "the" language was "corrupted" by the Irish coming over in the nineteenth century. Their Lallans letters to the editor etc are grotesque and obscene in their inauthenticity. I have yet to hear a single speaker on radio or anywhere else actually speak the language they are advocating when they are advocating Scots. Yes, let children be aware of Dunbar, Henryson etc up to Soutar; but they should know that the sounds they use in Castlemilk and other working class schemes go back to these poets: the middle class mob who dominate the "Scots" lobby would see their language as "slang" etc, and think that by stocking up with obsolete archaisms this would be going back to a "real" Scots. When for goodness sake are teachers going to just listen to what their children speak and ACCEPT it as good language, rather than all this status-driven rubbish about Scots.
So now we are to have all the headbangers teaching West of Scotland children they are using bad Scots as well as bad English. The "scots" lobby is run by a bunch of linguistic racists who think "the" language was "corrupted" by the Irish coming over in the nineteenth century. Their Lallans letters to the editor etc are grotesque and obscene in their inauthenticity. I have yet to hear a single speaker on radio or anywhere else actually speak the language they are advocating when they are advocating Scots. Yes, let children be aware of Dunbar, Henryson etc up to Soutar; but they should know that the sounds they use in Castlemilk and other working class schemes go back to these poets: the middle class mob who dominate the "Scots" lobby would see their language as "slang" etc, and think that by stocking up with obsolete archaisms this would be going back to a "real" Scots. When for goodness sake are teachers going to just listen to what their children speak and ACCEPT it as good language, rather than all this status-driven rubbish about Scots.
Posted by: Shiltrum, Republic of Alba on 5:27pm Sun 17 Feb 08
[quote][bold]JC[/bold] wrote:
No, you should be ensuring that children can read, write and understand English and be able to communicate with other English speakers, not wasting our taxes on pointless nationalistic political gimmicks such as this, not least because there is no such language as 'Scots'. [/quote] JC
You Idiot.
"No such language as Scots"
Total DRIVEL.......indeed Scots was the language of literature, church and Royalty,... as well as the man in the street(or Wynd) ....before the union and the butcher's apron.
Ye've neither knowledge or respect for your culture or for your country(if indeed you are a Scot..which ye dinna deserve tae be Sir !!)
JC wrote:
No, you should be ensuring that children can read, write and understand English and be able to communicate with other English speakers, not wasting our taxes on pointless nationalistic political gimmicks such as this, not least because there is no such language as 'Scots'.
JC
You Idiot.
"No such language as Scots"
Total DRIVEL.......indeed Scots was the language of literature, church and Royalty,... as well as the man in the street(or Wynd) ....before the union and the butcher's apron.
Ye've neither knowledge or respect for your culture or for your country(if indeed you are a Scot..which ye dinna deserve tae be Sir !!)
Posted by: ZenBroon on 11:03pm Wed 20 Feb 08
Very good article. Sorry to disappoint the earlier poster but the mythical middle-class Lallans-spouting “Scots lobby” just doesn’t exist. If it did, maybe our unique tongue would get better funding and support.
Very good article. Sorry to disappoint the earlier poster but the mythical middle-class Lallans-spouting “Scots lobby” just doesn’t exist. If it did, maybe our unique tongue would get better funding and support.
Posted by: Tulloch Gorum, Embra on 12:06pm Thu 28 Feb 08
Guid tae see this frae the new govrement. Aiblins we can nou be luikin a better future fer wir leid, ane whaur govrenments an schuils gie it mair nor a token nod on Burns' Nicht!
An JC, dinna be sic a gowk: Scots is a language richt enou, hauldin tae the contrar is aye based mair on prejudice nor on onie kind o linguistic evidents.
Guid tae see this frae the new govrement. Aiblins we can nou be luikin a better future fer wir leid, ane whaur govrenments an schuils gie it mair nor a token nod on Burns' Nicht!
An JC, dinna be sic a gowk: Scots is a language richt enou, hauldin tae the contrar is aye based mair on prejudice nor on onie kind o linguistic evidents.