Platini scraps goal-line technology plans Michael Grant
PROPOSALS TO introduce goal-line technology to football were scrapped at a meeting of the game's powerbrokers in Gleneagles yesterday, but an experiment will
go ahead to add two more assistant referees who will be positioned behind either goal.
Sepp Blatter and Michel Platini, the presidents of Fifa and Uefa respectively, pushed through the rejection of goal-line technology at a meeting of the International Football Association Board (IFAB).
Both SFA chief executive Gordon Smith and his English counterpart Brian Barwick had both been in favour of technology to signify whether a ball had crossed the line, but in a surprise decision they were outvoted.
Instead Platini's idea of having two more assistant referees - meaning every game would be controlled by a referee, four assistants and a fourth (or will they become sixth?) official - will be given a trial at some Fifa or Uefa tournament, perhaps a youth competition, in the future.
The initiative was widely ridiculed when it was first proposed by Platini and,
if approved, it will put additional strain on national associations who are already struggling to recruit enough referees and assistants.
"The new experiment is presented by Michel Platini," said Fifa general-secretary Jerome Valcke. "He believes that technology will lead first to the goal line, then maybe to deciding offsides, then perhaps what is or is not a penalty. That's why there was a request to use these additional referees.
"It was decided that there will be an experiment done with that, with the assistants operating behind the goals," said Smith.
Barwick was disappointed goal-line technology was now "dead in the water". He said: "That's a disappointment to the FA but we absolutely respect the democracy of the international board. It has been decided that football is a human game, not necessarily a technical game.
"Like a lot of associations, recruiting referees and assistants is an issue for us and this would require two more for every game. We will see how this pans out."
The IFAB members did not uphold Smith's proposal that video evidence be retrospectively used throughout football to punish players for diving, although individual countries can act independently on the matter and the SFA will push ahead with a pilot scheme.
That means that from next season a player proven to have deliberately deceived a referee will be hit with a suspension, probably two games.
Meanwhile, Barwick admitted his disappointment that Scotland would not be at Wembley in May.
A match had been agreed between the two countries until new Scotland manager George Burley decided to decline it. "I think everyone had been excited about it. That suggests there is an appetite for this fixture. There certainly is at the FA."
|
|

Posted by: Sammy on 12:15am Sun 9 Mar 08
What is wrong with these dinasours, when are they going to move with the times and introduce the use of video replays or goal line technology. Football is a human game, correct, the human game comes in when players are willing to dive, pull their oppsitions about without the ref seeing it and claiming for decisions that clearly isnt theirs. Football is a game of skill and technical ability but there is that much money and pressure on teams that they will do anything to get that win. What has happenned to our beautiful game ?
What is wrong with these dinasours, when are they going to move with the times and introduce the use of video replays or goal line technology. Football is a human game, correct, the human game comes in when players are willing to dive, pull their oppsitions about without the ref seeing it and claiming for decisions that clearly isnt theirs. Football is a game of skill and technical ability but there is that much money and pressure on teams that they will do anything to get that win. What has happenned to our beautiful game ?
Posted by: sandy, Cyprus on 7:03am Sun 9 Mar 08
Sammy, there are two sides to that debate. Firstly the beauty of football is that whether it is played in a local park or a world cup final the teams have the same level of basic equipment (22 players, 1 ref and possibly 2 lino`s) Introduce technology and you disadvantage and penalise financially alot of clubs , think about Gretna! they couldn`t afford it (joke). Secondly football thrives on contoversy, what would we all talk about at night in the boozer if the game was made clinical, remember that goal in 66 that never was etc etc. Anyway just a thought.
Sammy, there are two sides to that debate. Firstly the beauty of football is that whether it is played in a local park or a world cup final the teams have the same level of basic equipment (22 players, 1 ref and possibly 2 lino`s) Introduce technology and you disadvantage and penalise financially alot of clubs , think about Gretna! they couldn`t afford it (joke). Secondly football thrives on contoversy, what would we all talk about at night in the boozer if the game was made clinical, remember that goal in 66 that never was etc etc. Anyway just a thought.
Posted by: tonyboy on 7:15am Sun 9 Mar 08
Football (spectator variety) is all about incident and argument and debate about decisions. Was he offside? Did it cross the line?
Sanitize it with technology & ensure the referee is always right and you start to kill it.
Look closely and you will see that referees have cloven feet and are usually wrong!! Then rejoice for that is my kind of fitba.
You armchair pundits who want another version are a real threat to [bold]our[/bold] beautiful game.
Football (spectator variety) is all about incident and argument and debate about decisions. Was he offside? Did it cross the line?
Sanitize it with technology & ensure the referee is always right and you start to kill it.
Look closely and you will see that referees have cloven feet and are usually wrong!! Then rejoice for that is my kind of fitba.
You armchair pundits who want another version are a real threat to
our beautiful game.
Posted by: Danny, Dumbarton on 9:14am Sun 9 Mar 08
I think it`s unfeasible to introduce this technology.I can`t remember many occasions when this has been a matter of debate,apart from 66.It`s not as if it is a common occurrence,in fact it is very rare in the SPL.
I think it`s unfeasible to introduce this technology.I can`t remember many occasions when this has been a matter of debate,apart from 66.It`s not as if it is a common occurrence,in fact it is very rare in the SPL.
Posted by: sammy on 11:44am Sun 9 Mar 08
[quote][bold]tonyboy[/bold] wrote:
Football (spectator variety) is all about incident and argument and debate about decisions. Was he offside? Did it cross the line? Sanitize it with technology & ensure the referee is always right and you start to kill it. Look closely and you will see that referees have cloven feet and are usually wrong!! Then rejoice for that is my kind of fitba. You armchair pundits who want another version are a real threat to [bold]our[/bold] beautiful game. [/quote] I have been a season ticket holders for over five years so if that makes me an armchair so be it.
I dont want to sanitise the game I just want the cheating taken out and the correct decisions to be made. Can you honestly say that during the Scotland/Italy qualifyer you woudnt have wanted the video playback?
As for smaller teams not having the finance, it is about time that a small percentage of transfer signing on fees is put into a fund to finance these type of modernisation projects and to ensure the referee profession is an attractive career option.
The debate and the opinion is only a by product.
tonyboy wrote:
Football (spectator variety) is all about incident and argument and debate about decisions. Was he offside? Did it cross the line? Sanitize it with technology & ensure the referee is always right and you start to kill it. Look closely and you will see that referees have cloven feet and are usually wrong!! Then rejoice for that is my kind of fitba. You armchair pundits who want another version are a real threat to our beautiful game.
I have been a season ticket holders for over five years so if that makes me an armchair so be it.
I dont want to sanitise the game I just want the cheating taken out and the correct decisions to be made. Can you honestly say that during the Scotland/Italy qualifyer you woudnt have wanted the video playback?
As for smaller teams not having the finance, it is about time that a small percentage of transfer signing on fees is put into a fund to finance these type of modernisation projects and to ensure the referee profession is an attractive career option.
The debate and the opinion is only a by product.
Posted by: trueblue on 11:53am Sun 9 Mar 08
it has its good point to introduce this for one we wouldnt have to listen to the celtic whinging week after week about refs being against them but then again they problay say someone has altered the video lol
it has its good point to introduce this for one we wouldnt have to listen to the celtic whinging week after week about refs being against them but then again they problay say someone has altered the video lol
Posted by: MM on 11:59am Sun 9 Mar 08
[quote][bold]trueblue[/bold] wrote:
it has its good point to introduce this for one we wouldnt have to listen to the celtic whinging week after week about refs being against them but then again they problay say someone has altered the video lol[/quote] True, i can remember celtic and their fans denying that hartson was singing IRA chants which was caught on mobile footage, its a culture thing.
trueblue wrote:
it has its good point to introduce this for one we wouldnt have to listen to the celtic whinging week after week about refs being against them but then again they problay say someone has altered the video lol
True, i can remember celtic and their fans denying that hartson was singing IRA chants which was caught on mobile footage, its a culture thing.
Posted by: bob mckay, glasgow on 1:09pm Sun 9 Mar 08
[quote][bold]MM[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]trueblue[/bold] wrote: it has its good point to introduce this for one we wouldnt have to listen to the celtic whinging week after week about refs being against them but then again they problay say someone has altered the video lol[/quote] True, i can remember celtic and their fans denying that hartson was singing IRA chants which was caught on mobile footage, its a culture thing. [/quote] Drat you two beat me to it. Personally i love football worldwide in all its myriad controversies and debates and would not want technology BUT for the endless bleating of one club who in recent weeks have gained 9 points from errors in their favour yet their manager and holy goalie have this week stated referees are against them. Again. So i think we need every bit of technology possible just to shut them up even if temporarily.
MM wrote:
trueblue wrote: it has its good point to introduce this for one we wouldnt have to listen to the celtic whinging week after week about refs being against them but then again they problay say someone has altered the video lol
True, i can remember celtic and their fans denying that hartson was singing IRA chants which was caught on mobile footage, its a culture thing.
Drat you two beat me to it. Personally i love football worldwide in all its myriad controversies and debates and would not want technology BUT for the endless bleating of one club who in recent weeks have gained 9 points from errors in their favour yet their manager and holy goalie have this week stated referees are against them. Again. So i think we need every bit of technology possible just to shut them up even if temporarily.
Posted by: Danny, Dumbarton on 4:04pm Sun 9 Mar 08
Yet another football debate hijacked by sectarian ramblings from the follow followers of Dignity F.C.
You highlight decisions allegedly going in Celtic`s favour,while all the while being looked after by Brither McCurry,Brither Dougal,and the rest of Lodge Park Gardens.
The only sectarian/racist behaviour caught on film was bigots in Pamplona,Nazis in Israel,and in the San Siro.
As well as bringing in foreign referees,I suggest also bringing in the Guarda Civilia,they know how to deal with sectarian bigoted thugs.
Hard Spanish wood applied liberally to the head is more effective than wee blue books,as most of these barbarians probably lack the basics in English.Maybe its an education issue.
For proof ,decipher trueblue`s scrawl.The interweb`s version of scrawling with a blunt crayon.
Blame Catholic Schools,for making me more intellegent than these rednecks.
Yet another football debate hijacked by sectarian ramblings from the follow followers of Dignity F.C.
You highlight decisions allegedly going in Celtic`s favour,while all the while being looked after by Brither McCurry,Brither Dougal,and the rest of Lodge Park Gardens.
The only sectarian/racist behaviour caught on film was bigots in Pamplona,Nazis in Israel,and in the San Siro.
As well as bringing in foreign referees,I suggest also bringing in the Guarda Civilia,they know how to deal with sectarian bigoted thugs.
Hard Spanish wood applied liberally to the head is more effective than wee blue books,as most of these barbarians probably lack the basics in English.Maybe its an education issue.
For proof ,decipher trueblue`s scrawl.The interweb`s version of scrawling with a blunt crayon.
Blame Catholic Schools,for making me more intellegent than these rednecks.
Posted by: sammy on 5:43pm Sun 9 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Danny[/bold] wrote:
Yet another football debate hijacked by sectarian ramblings from the follow followers of Dignity F.C. You highlight decisions allegedly going in Celtic`s favour,while all the while being looked after by Brither McCurry,Brither Dougal,and the rest of Lodge Park Gardens. The only sectarian/racist behaviour caught on film was bigots in Pamplona,Nazis in Israel,and in the San Siro. As well as bringing in foreign referees,I suggest also bringing in the Guarda Civilia,they know how to deal with sectarian bigoted thugs. Hard Spanish wood applied liberally to the head is more effective than wee blue books,as most of these barbarians probably lack the basics in English.Maybe its an education issue. For proof ,decipher trueblue`s scrawl.The interweb`s version of scrawling with a blunt crayon. Blame Catholic Schools,for making me more intellegent than these rednecks.[/quote] During your own ramblings you are also [bold]guilty[/bold] of missing the topic which was the use of goal line technolgy. Try stick to the topic Sherlock.
Danny wrote:
Yet another football debate hijacked by sectarian ramblings from the follow followers of Dignity F.C. You highlight decisions allegedly going in Celtic`s favour,while all the while being looked after by Brither McCurry,Brither Dougal,and the rest of Lodge Park Gardens. The only sectarian/racist behaviour caught on film was bigots in Pamplona,Nazis in Israel,and in the San Siro. As well as bringing in foreign referees,I suggest also bringing in the Guarda Civilia,they know how to deal with sectarian bigoted thugs. Hard Spanish wood applied liberally to the head is more effective than wee blue books,as most of these barbarians probably lack the basics in English.Maybe its an education issue. For proof ,decipher trueblue`s scrawl.The interweb`s version of scrawling with a blunt crayon. Blame Catholic Schools,for making me more intellegent than these rednecks.
During your own ramblings you are also
guilty of missing the topic which was the use of goal line technolgy. Try stick to the topic Sherlock.
Posted by: Danny, Dumbarton on 5:55pm Sun 9 Mar 08
Samuel,
I did stick to the topic,I was only responding to the bigots.Why aren`t you having a go at them as well?
Anyway,my point was some way proven today with the acts of sheer thuggery by both player and manager of Dignity F.C.,where`s the Spanish Police when you need them?
Samuel,
I did stick to the topic,I was only responding to the bigots.Why aren`t you having a go at them as well?
Anyway,my point was some way proven today with the acts of sheer thuggery by both player and manager of Dignity F.C.,where`s the Spanish Police when you need them?
Posted by: bob mckay, glasgow on 8:27pm Sun 9 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Danny[/bold] wrote:
Samuel, I did stick to the topic,I was only responding to the bigots.Why aren`t you having a go at them as well? Anyway,my point was some way proven today with the acts of sheer thuggery by both player and manager of Dignity F.C.,where`s the Spanish Police when you need them?[/quote] Oh Danny bhoy, the police, the police are calling...the only police involvement should be after goaline technology is trained on your holy goalie; his antics ( backed up by his cabbage patch doll manager) are a public nuisance. A wee camera catching his hand gestures would persuade me of the need for the technology. PS Your catalan brothers in arms would be sorely hurt by your support of the use of the spanish police. And if you are looking for a bigot, have a look in the mirror- or maybe not your self-esteem seeems very low as it is!
Danny wrote:
Samuel, I did stick to the topic,I was only responding to the bigots.Why aren`t you having a go at them as well? Anyway,my point was some way proven today with the acts of sheer thuggery by both player and manager of Dignity F.C.,where`s the Spanish Police when you need them?
Oh Danny bhoy, the police, the police are calling...the only police involvement should be after goaline technology is trained on your holy goalie; his antics ( backed up by his cabbage patch doll manager) are a public nuisance. A wee camera catching his hand gestures would persuade me of the need for the technology. PS Your catalan brothers in arms would be sorely hurt by your support of the use of the spanish police. And if you are looking for a bigot, have a look in the mirror- or maybe not your self-esteem seeems very low as it is!
Posted by: Danny, Dumbarton on 10:02pm Sun 9 Mar 08
bob,
Artur Boruc blesses himself,is that a crime in your eyes?Certainly it annoys the rank and file at certain football grounds,why I don`t know.
bob,
Artur Boruc blesses himself,is that a crime in your eyes?Certainly it annoys the rank and file at certain football grounds,why I don`t know.